As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 13, 2009
Securities Act File No. 333-151930
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form N-2
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Pre-Effective Amendment
No.
Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1
TRIANGLE CAPITAL
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Charter)
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(919) 719-4770
Garland S. Tucker III
President and Chief Executive Officer
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
(Name and Address of Agent For
Service)
Copies to:
John A. Good, Esq.
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
100 Peabody Place, Suite 900
Memphis, Tennessee
38103-3672
Tel:
(901) 543-5901
Fax:
(888) 543-4644
Approximate Date of Proposed Public
Offering: From time to time after the effective
date of the Registration Statement.
If any securities being registered on this form will be offered
on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415
under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered
in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the
following
box. þ
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check
appropriate
box): o
when declared effective pursuant to section 8(c).
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Aggregate
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Securities being Registered
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
|
$
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,790(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
APRIL 13, 2009
PROSPECTUS
$300,000,000
Common Stock
We may offer, from time to time, up to $300,000,000 worth of our
common stock, $0.001 par value per share in one or more
offerings. Our common stock may be offered at prices and on
terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this
prospectus.
We may offer shares of common stock at a discount to net asset
value per share in certain circumstances. On May 7, 2008,
our common stockholders voted to allow us to issue common stock
at a price below net asset value per share for a period of one
year ending May 6, 2009. Sales of common stock at prices
below net asset value per share dilute the interests of existing
stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset value
per share and may reduce our market price per share.
Our stockholders did not specify a maximum discount below net
asset value at which we are able to issue our common stock;
however, we do not intend to issue shares of our common stock
below net asset value unless our board of directors determines
that it would be in our stockholders best interests to do
so. Shares of closed-end investment companies such as us
frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value. This
risk is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset
value per share may decline. We cannot predict whether our
common stock will trade above, at or below net asset value. You
should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus
supplement carefully before you invest in our common stock.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers through agents designated from time to time by us, or
to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement
relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock, and will
disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters
or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount
may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may
not sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of such common stock.
We are a specialty finance company that provides customized
financing solutions to lower middle market companies located
throughout the United States, with an emphasis on the Southeast.
Our investment objective is to seek attractive returns by
generating current income from our debt investments and capital
appreciation from our equity related investments. We are an
internally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol TCAP. On April 9, 2009, the last
reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Market was $10.40 per share.
Investing in our common stock is speculative and involves
numerous risks, and you could lose your entire investment if any
of the risks occurs. Among these risks is the risk associated
with the use of leverage. For more information regarding these
risks, please see Risk Factors beginning on
page 13.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Please read this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus
supplement, if any, before investing, and keep it for future
reference. It concisely sets forth important information about
us that a prospective investor ought to know before investing in
our common stock. We file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information about us with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. This information is
available free of charge by contacting us at 3700 Glenwood
Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, or by
telephone at
(919) 719-4770
or on our website at www.tcap.com. The Securities and
Exchange Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov
that contains such information.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2009.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, using
the shelf registration process. Under the shelf
registration process, we may offer, from time to time, up to
$300,000,000 worth of our common stock on terms to be determined
at the time of the offering. This prospectus provides you with a
general description of the common stock that we may offer. Each
time we use this prospectus to offer common stock, we will
provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific
information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus
supplement may also add, update or change information contained
in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and
any accompanying prospectus supplement together with the
additional information described under Available
Information and Risk Factors before you make
an investment decision.
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any
information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus or any accompanying supplement to this prospectus.
You must not rely on any unauthorized information or
representations not contained in this prospectus or any
accompanying prospectus supplement as if we had authorized it.
This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement do
not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer
to buy any security other than the registered securities to
which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such
an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. The information
contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement is accurate as of the dates on their covers.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this
prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the
information that you may want to consider. You should read the
entire prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully,
including Risk Factors, Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the financial statements contained
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Triangle Capital Corporation is a Maryland corporation
incorporated on October 10, 2006, for the purpose of
acquiring Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP, or Triangle SBIC,
and its general partner, Triangle Mezzanine LLC, or TML, raising
capital in its Initial Public Offering, or IPO, which closed on
February 21, 2007 and, thereafter, operating as an
internally managed business development company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act.
Triangle SBIC is licensed as a small business investment
company, or SBIC, by the United States Small Business
Administration, or SBA. Simultaneously with the consummation of
our IPO, we acquired all of the equity interests in Triangle
SBIC and TML as described elsewhere in this prospectus under
Formation Transactions, whereby Triangle SBIC became
our wholly owned subsidiary. Unless otherwise noted in this
prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement, the terms
we, us, our and
Triangle refer to Triangle SBIC prior to the IPO and
to Triangle Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries currently
existing.
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Triangle Capital Corporation is a specialty finance company that
provides customized financing solutions to lower middle market
companies located throughout the United States. We define lower
middle market companies as those having annual revenues between
$10.0 and $100.0 million. Our investment objective is to
seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments. Our investment philosophy is to partner
with business owners, management teams and financial sponsors to
provide flexible financing solutions to fund growth, changes of
control, or other corporate events. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt securities secured by first and
second lien security interests in portfolio company assets,
coupled with equity interests.
We focus on investments in companies with a history of
generating revenues and positive cash flows, an established
market position and a proven management team with a strong
operating discipline. Our target portfolio company has annual
revenues between $20.0 and $75.0 million and annual
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) between $2.0 and $20.0 million. We
believe that these companies have less access to capital and
that the market for such capital is underserved relative to
larger companies. Companies of this size are generally privately
held and are less well known to traditional capital sources such
as commercial and investment banks.
Our investments generally range from $5.0 to $15.0 million
per portfolio company. In certain situations, we have partnered
with other funds to provide larger financing commitments. We are
continuing to operate Triangle SBIC as an SBIC and to utilize
the proceeds of the sale of SBA guaranteed debentures, referred
to herein as SBA leverage, to enhance returns to our
stockholders. As of December 31, 2008, we had investments
in 34 portfolio companies, with an aggregate cost of
$180.2 million.
Our principal executive offices are located at 3700 Glenwood
Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, and our
telephone number is
919-719-4770.
We maintain a website on the Internet at www.tcap.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, and
you should not consider that information to be part of this
prospectus.
Our
Business Strategy
We seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments by:
|
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Underserved Markets. We believe
that broad-based consolidation in the financial services
industry coupled with operating margin and growth pressures have
caused financial institutions to
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
de-emphasize
services to lower middle market companies in favor of larger
corporate clients and capital market transactions. We believe
these dynamics have resulted in the financing market for lower
middle market companies to be underserved, providing us with
greater investment opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Providing Customized Financing Solutions. We
offer a variety of financing structures and have the flexibility
to structure our investments to meet the needs of our portfolio
companies. Typically we invest in senior and subordinated debt
securities, coupled with equity interests. We believe our
ability to customize financing arrangements makes us an
attractive partner to lower middle market companies.
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Experience of Our Management
Team. Our senior management team has more than
100 years of combined experience advising, investing in,
lending to and operating companies across changing market
cycles. The members of our management team have diverse
investment backgrounds, with prior experience at investment
banks, specialty finance companies, commercial banks, and
privately and publicly held companies in the capacity of
executive officers. We believe this diverse experience provides
us with an in depth understanding of the strategic, financial
and operational opportunities associated with lower middle
market companies. We believe this understanding allows us to
select and structure better investments and to efficiently
monitor and provide managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies.
|
|
|
|
Applying Rigorous Underwriting Policies and Active Portfolio
Management. Our senior management team has
implemented rigorous underwriting policies that are followed in
each transaction. These policies include a thorough analysis of
each potential portfolio companys competitive position,
financial performance, management team operating discipline,
growth potential and industry attractiveness, allowing us to
better assess the companys prospects. After investing in a
company, we monitor the investment closely, typically receiving
monthly, quarterly and annual financial statements. We analyze
and discuss in detail the companys financial performance
with management in addition to attending regular board of
directors meetings. We believe that our initial and ongoing
portfolio review process allows us to monitor effectively the
performance and prospects of our portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
Taking Advantage of Low Cost Debentures Guaranteed by the
SBA. Our license to do business as an SBIC allows
us to issue fixed-rate, low interest debentures which are
guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the capital markets,
potentially allowing us to increase our net interest income
beyond the levels achievable by other BDCs utilizing traditional
leverage.
|
|
|
|
Investing Across Multiple Industries. While we
focus our investments in lower middle market companies, we seek
to invest across various industries. We monitor our investment
portfolio to ensure we have acceptable industry balance, using
industry and market metrics as key indicators. By monitoring our
investment portfolio for industry balance we seek to reduce the
effects of economic downturns associated with any particular
industry or market sector. However, we may from time to time
hold securities of a single portfolio company that comprise more
than 5.0% of our total assets
and/or more
than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio
company. For that reason, we are classified as a non-diversified
management investment company under the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
Utilizing Long-Standing Relationships to Source
Deals. Our senior management team maintains
extensive relationships with entrepreneurs, financial sponsors,
attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, commercial bankers
and other non-bank providers of capital who refer prospective
portfolio companies to us. These relationships historically have
generated significant investment opportunities. We believe that
our network of relationships will continue to produce attractive
investment opportunities.
|
Our
Investment Criteria
We utilize the following criteria and guidelines in evaluating
investment opportunities. However, not all of these criteria and
guidelines have been, or will be, met in connection with each of
our investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Established Companies With Positive Cash
Flow. We seek to invest in established companies
with a history of generating revenues and positive cash flows.
We typically focus on companies with a history
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
of profitability and minimum trailing twelve month EBITDA of
$2.0 million. We do not invest in
start-up
companies, distressed situations, turn-around
situations or companies that we believe have unproven business
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Teams With Meaningful Equity
Ownership. Based on our prior investment
experience, we believe that a management team with significant
experience with a portfolio company or relevant industry
experience and meaningful equity ownership is more committed to
a portfolio company. We believe management teams with these
attributes are more likely to manage the companies in a manner
that protects our debt investment and enhances the value of our
equity investment.
|
|
|
|
Strong Competitive Position. We seek to invest
in companies that have developed strong positions within their
respective markets, are well positioned to capitalize on growth
opportunities and compete in industries with barriers to entry.
We also seek to invest in companies that exhibit a competitive
advantage, which may help to protect their market position and
profitability.
|
|
|
|
Varied Customer and Supplier Base. We prefer
to invest in companies that have a varied customer and supplier
base. Companies with a varied customer and supplier base are
generally better able to endure economic downturns, industry
consolidation and shifting customer preferences.
|
|
|
|
Significant Invested Capital. We believe the
existence of significant underlying equity value provides
important support to investments. We will look for portfolio
companies that we believe have sufficient value beyond the layer
of the capital structure in which we invest.
|
Our
Investment Portfolio
As of December 31, 2008, we had investments in 34 portfolio
companies with an aggregate cost of approximately
$180.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, we had no
investments that represented more than 10% of the total fair
value of our investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2008,
the weighted average yield on all of our outstanding debt
investments (including
payment-in-kind,
or PIK, interest) was approximately 14.4%. The weighted average
yield on all of our outstanding investments (including equity
and equity-linked investments) was approximately 13.2% as of
December 31, 2008. There is no assurance that the portfolio
yields will remain at these levels after the offering. The
following table sets forth certain audited information as of
December 31, 2008 for each portfolio company in which we
had a debt or equity investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Non-Control / Non-Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambient Air Corporation (AAC) and Peaden-Hobbs
Mechanical, LLC (PHM) (6%)*
620 West Baldwin Road
Panama City, FL 32405
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Note-AAC
(14%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
3,182,231
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Note-AAC
(18%, Due 03/11)
|
|
|
1,917,045
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock-PHM
(126,634 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants-AAC (455 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,361
|
|
|
|
600,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099,276
|
|
|
|
5,231,971
|
|
|
|
5,689,710
|
|
American De-Rosa Lamparts, LLC
|
|
Wholesale and
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Hallmark Lighting (8%)*
|
|
Distribution
|
|
(15.25%, Due 10/13)
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
1945 S. Tubeway Ave.
Commerce, CA 90040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC (4%)
|
|
Direct Marketing
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 Chesterfield Center, Suite 500
|
|
Services
|
|
(15%, Due 03/15)
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
Chesterfield, MO 63017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
APO Newco, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3080 Bartlett Corporate Drive
|
|
Consumer
|
|
(14%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
Bartlett, TN 38133
|
|
Marketing Products
|
|
Unit purchase warrant
(87,302 Class C units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
1,033,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,932,864
|
|
|
|
2,941,064
|
|
ARC Industries, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Remediation
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 Dalton Avenue
|
|
Services
|
|
(19%, Due 11/10)
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
Charlotte, NC 28225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Art Headquarters, LLC (3%)*
11885
44th Street
Clearwater, FL 33762
|
|
Retail, Wholesale
and Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/10)
|
|
$
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
$
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
$
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
|
|
Membership unit warrants
(15% of units (150 units))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
|
2,350,751
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
Assurance Operations Corp. (4%)*
|
|
Auto Components /
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9341 Highway 43
|
|
Metal Fabrication
|
|
(17%, Due 03/12)
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
3,985,742
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
Killen, AL 35645
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (57 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
4,242,885
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
CV Holdings, LLC (12%)*
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1030 Riverfront Center
|
|
Healthcare Products
|
|
(16%, Due 09/13)
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
Amsterdam, NY 12010
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
Cyrus Networks, LLC (8%)*
4201 Southwest Freeway
|
|
Data Center
Services Provider
|
|
Senior Note
(6%, Due 07/13)
|
|
|
5,539,867
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
Houston, TX 77027
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(9%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of
Credit (6%)
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,989,820
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
DataPath, Inc. (0%)*
350 Technology Pkwy., Suite 400
Norcross, GA 30092
|
|
Satellite
Communication
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(210,263 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Systems Protection, Inc. (5%)*
517 North Industrial Drive
Zebulon, NC 27577
|
|
Power Protection
Systems
Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 12/15)
|
|
|
3,059,267
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Note
(6%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(500 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989,902
|
|
|
|
4,248,168
|
|
|
|
4,248,168
|
|
Energy Hardware Holdings, LLC (0%)*
2730 E. Phillips Road
Greer, SC 29650
|
|
Machined Parts
Distribution
|
|
Voting Units
(4,833 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCL Graphics, Inc. (8%)*
4600 N. Olcott Ave.
|
|
Commercial Printing
Services
|
|
Senior Note
(8%, Due 5/12)
|
|
|
1,669,200
|
|
|
|
1,663,083
|
|
|
|
1,663,083
|
|
Harwood Heights, IL 60706
|
|
|
|
Senior Note
(12%, Due 5/13)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(18%, Due 11/13)
|
|
|
3,393,186
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062,386
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. (1%)*
705 E. Harrison Street, Suite 200
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Notes
(12%, Due 04/11)
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,356,781
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Corona, CA 92879
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(283 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,905
|
|
|
|
11,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,639,686
|
|
|
|
1,011,719
|
|
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (4%)*
15822 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, CA 92127
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(11%, Due 12/11)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(5,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
583,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,583,600
|
|
Gerli & Company (2%)*
75 Stark Street
|
|
Specialty Woven
Fabrics
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 08/11)
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,092,786
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
Plains, PA 18705
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock Warrants
(56,559 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,176,200
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
Holding Company, LLC (10%)*
|
|
Cleaning and Repair
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
350 N. Old Woodward, Ste. 100
Birmingham, MI 48009
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant (2.5)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,300
|
|
|
|
1,407,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,985,565
|
|
|
|
8,829,565
|
|
Jenkins Services, LLC (10%)*
45681 Oakbrook Ct., Ste. 113
|
|
Restoration
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(17.5%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
8,411,172
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
Sterling, VA 20166
|
|
|
|
Convertible Note
(10%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,786,172
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Library Systems & Services, LLC (3%)*
12850 Middlebrook Road
|
|
Municipal Business
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,948,573
|
|
|
$
|
1,948,573
|
|
Germantown, MD 20874
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (112 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,995
|
|
|
|
802,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,007,568
|
|
|
|
2,751,073
|
|
Novolyte Technologies, Inc. (8%)*
111 West Irene Road Zachory, LA 70791
|
|
Specialty
Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16%, Due 04/15)
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
(600 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(22,960 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
Syrgis Holdings, Inc. (6%)*
1025 Mary Laidley Drive
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note
(7%, Due 08/12-02/14)
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
Covington, KY 41017
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(2,114 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
5,602,773
|
|
|
|
5,135,473
|
|
TrustHouse Services Group, Inc. (5%)*
21 Armory Drive
|
|
Food Management
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 09/15)
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
Wheeling, WV 26003
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(1,495 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Units
(79 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,686,542
|
|
|
|
4,394,042
|
|
Twin-Star International, Inc. (6%)*
115 S.E. 4th Avenue
|
|
Consumer Home
Furnishings
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
Delray Beach, FL 33483
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note
(8%, Due 04/13)
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,801,921
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
Waste Recyclers Holdings, LLC (13%)
261 Highway 20 East
|
|
Environmental and
Facilities Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15.5%, Due 01/13)
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
Suite A, B & D
Freeport, FL 32439
|
|
|
|
Class A Preferred Units
(300 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Purchase
Warrant (1,170,083 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(153,219 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
Wholesale Floors, Inc. (4%)*
8855 N. Black Canyon Highway
|
|
Commercial
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 06/14)
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
Phoenix, AZ 85021
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant (4.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,474,747
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
Yellowstone Landscape Group, Inc. (14%)*
|
|
Landscaping
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 Elm Street
|
|
Services
|
|
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
New Canaan, CT 06840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control / Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,090,259
|
|
|
|
138,413,589
|
|
|
|
135,712,877
|
|
Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Point, LLC (6%)*
770 Pelham Road, Suite 200
|
|
Asset Management
Software Provider
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
|
5,035,428
|
|
|
|
5,035,428
|
|
Greenville, SC 29615
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(10 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
371,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
|
5,535,428
|
|
|
|
5,406,828
|
|
Axxiom Manufacturing, Inc (3%)*
11927 South Highway 6
|
|
Industrial
Equipment
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/11)
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
Fresno, TX 77545
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(34,100 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
408,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,303,277
|
|
|
|
2,522,777
|
|
Brantley Transportation, LLC
(Brantley Transportation) and
Pine Street Holdings, LLC
(Pine Street)(4) (4%)*
808 N. Ruth Street
Monahans, TX 79756
|
|
Oil and Gas
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
Brantley Transportation
(14%, Due 12/12)
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Warrants
Brantley Transportation
(4,560 common units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
41,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
Pine Street (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
139,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pine Street (2,220 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,924,125
|
|
|
|
3,871,525
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Dyson Corporation (12%)*
53 Freedom Road
Painesville, OH 44077
|
|
Custom Forging and
Fastener Supplies
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 12/13)
|
|
$
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
$
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
$
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(1,000,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
964,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
|
11,123,339
|
|
|
|
11,088,039
|
|
Equisales, LLC (9%)*
13811 Cullen Blvd.
|
|
Energy Products
and Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/12)
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
Houston, TX 77047
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(500,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,322,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,726,387
|
|
|
|
8,548,787
|
|
Flint Acquisition Corporation (2%)*
115 Todd Court
Thomasville, NC 27360
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Preferred Stock
(9,875 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genapure Corporation (1%)*
1205 Industrial Blvd. 18966
Southampton, PA
|
|
Lab Testing
Services
|
|
Common Stock
5,594 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,686,027
|
|
|
|
30,484,491
|
|
|
|
33,894,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischbein, LLC (14%)*
151 Walker Road
|
|
Packaging and
Materials Handling
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16.5%, Due 05/13)
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
7,053,458
|
|
|
|
7,053,458
|
|
Statesville, NC 28625
|
|
Equipment
Manufacturer
|
|
Membership Units
(4,200,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
|
5,444,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments, December 31, 2008 (199%)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,960,352
|
|
|
$
|
180,151,538
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Value as a percent of net assets |
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Common stock,
preferred stock and all warrants are non-income producing. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest rates on subordinated debt include cash interest rate
and, where applicable,
paid-in-kind
interest rate. |
|
(3) |
|
All investments are restricted as to resale and were valued at
fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. |
|
(4) |
|
Pine Street Holdings, LLC is the majority owner of Brantley
Transportation, LLC, and its sole business purpose is its
ownership of Brantley Transportation, LLC. |
Formation
Triangle Capital Corporation is a Maryland corporation formed on
October 10, 2006, for the purpose of acquiring 100% of the
equity interests in Triangle SBIC and TML, raising capital in
our IPO and thereafter operating as an internally managed BDC
under the 1940 Act. Triangle SBIC is our wholly owned subsidiary
and is licensed to do business as an SBIC.
We are a closed-end, non-diversified management investment
company that has elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940
Act. In addition, Triangle SBIC has elected to be treated as a
BDC. We are internally managed by our executive officers under
the supervision of our board of directors. As a result, we do
not pay any external investment advisory fees, but instead we
incur the operating costs associated with employing investment
and portfolio management professionals.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with numerous regulatory
requirements. We are permitted to, and expect to, finance our
investments using debt and equity. However, our ability to use
debt is limited in certain significant respects. See
Regulations. As we qualified for RIC tax treatment
in 2007, we elected to be treated as a RIC for federal income
tax purposes with the filing of our 2007 corporate income tax
return, which will be effective as of January 1, 2007.
Accordingly, we generally will not pay corporate-level federal
income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we
distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC
tax treatment, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset
diversification
6
requirements and distribute annually at least 90.0% of our net
ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in
excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. See
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
The
Offering
We may offer, from time to time, up to $300,000,000 worth of our
common stock, on terms to be determined at the time of the
offering. Our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms
to be disclosed in one or more prospectus supplements.
We may offer shares of common stock at a discount to net asset
value per share at prices approximating market value less
selling expenses upon approval of our directors, including a
majority of our independent directors, in certain circumstances.
On May 7, 2008, our common stockholders voted to allow us
to issue common stock at a price below net asset value per share
for a period of one year ending on May 6, 2009. See
Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value in this
prospectus and in the prospectus supplement, if applicable.
Sales of common stock at prices below net asset value per share
dilute the interests of existing stockholders, have the effect
of reducing our net asset value per share and may reduce our
market price per share.
Our stockholders did not specify a maximum discount below net
asset value at which we are able to issue or common stock;
however, we do not intend to issue shares of our common stock
below net asset value unless our board of directors determines
that it would be in our stockholders best interests to do
so.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers by us or through agents designated from time to time
by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of
the offering, including the name or names of any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock by us, the
purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement
between us and our agents or underwriters or among our
underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not
sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of our common stock.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering
of our common stock:
|
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market symbol |
|
TCAP |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from selling our common stock
to make investments in lower middle market companies in
accordance with our investment objective and strategies and for
working capital and general corporate purposes. |
|
Dividends and distributions |
|
We pay quarterly dividends to our stockholders out of assets
legally available for distribution. Our dividends, if any, will
be determined by our board of directors. |
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
We have elected to be treated as a RIC. Accordingly, we
generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on
any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to
our stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC tax
treatment, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements and distribute annually at least
90.0% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. |
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. The
dividend reinvestment plan is an opt out dividend
reinvestment plan. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then
stockholders cash dividends will be automatically
reinvested in additional shares of |
7
|
|
|
|
|
our common stock, unless they specifically opt out
of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash
dividends. Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of
stock will be subject to the same federal, state and local tax
consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their
distributions in cash. See Dividend Reinvestment
Plan. |
|
Trading at a discount |
|
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a
discount to their net asset value. This risk is separate and
distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may
decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock will trade
above, at or below net asset value. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 13 and the
other information included in this prospectus, or any prospectus
supplement, for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider before deciding to invest in our common stock. |
|
Available information |
|
We are required to file periodic reports, current reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. This information
is available at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. and on the SECs Internet website at
www.sec.gov. We intend to provide much of the same information
on our website at www.tcap.com. Information contained on our
website is not part of this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement and should not be relied upon as such. |
8
FEES AND
EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
our and Triangle SBICs consolidated costs and expenses
that an investor in this offering will bear directly or
indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages
indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except
where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus
contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by
you, us or Triangle, or that
we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will
indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Transaction Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Offering expenses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
6.61
|
%(5)
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
11.35
|
%(6)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event that our common stock is sold to or through
underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will
disclose the applicable sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
In the event that we conduct an offering of our common stock, a
corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated
offering expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are
included in operating expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses may include sales load
and will be disclosed in a future prospectus supplement, if any. |
|
(5) |
|
Other expenses represent our estimated annual operating
expenses, excluding interest payments on borrowed funds. We do
not have an investment adviser and are internally managed by our
executive officers under the supervision of our board of
directors. As a result, we do not pay investment advisory fees,
but instead we pay the operating costs associated with employing
investment management professionals. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The total annual expenses are the sum of interest payments on
borrowed funds and other expenses. Total annual
expenses as a percentage of average net assets
attributable to common stock are higher than the total annual
expenses percentage would be for a company that is not
leveraged. The SEC requires that the Total annual
expenses percentage be calculated as a percentage of
average net assets, rather than average total assets, which
includes assets that have been funded with borrowed money. If
the Total annual expenses percentage were calculated
instead as a percentage of average total assets, we estimate
that our Total annual expenses would be
approximately 6.11% of average total assets. |
Example
The following example is required by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total
cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods
with respect to a hypothetical investment in us. In calculating
the following expense amounts, we assumed we would have no
additional leverage and that our operating expenses would remain
at the levels set forth in the table above. In the event that
shares to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through
underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will restate
this example to reflect the applicable sales load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
3 Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5.0% annual return
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses, and
actual expenses may be greater or lesser than those shown.
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5.0%
annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a
return greater or less than 5.0%. The table above does not
reflect additional SBA leverage that we intend to employ in the
future. Other expenses are based on estimated
amounts for the current fiscal year. In addition, while the
example assumes reinvestment of all dividends at net asset
value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will
receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by
dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a
participant by the market price per share of our common stock at
the close of trading on the dividend payment date, which may be
at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan for additional information regarding our
dividend reinvestment plan.
9
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The selected historical financial and other data below reflects
the consolidated operations of Triangle Capital Corporation and
Triangle SBIC. The selected financial data at and for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
have been derived from our financial statements that have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm. Financial information prior
to our initial public offering in 2007 is that of Triangle SBIC,
which is Triangle Capital Corporations predecessor. You
should read this selected financial and other data in
conjunction with our Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the financial statements and notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income statement data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest, fee and dividend income
|
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
5,855
|
|
|
$
|
6,443
|
|
|
$
|
10,912
|
|
|
$
|
21,056
|
|
Interest income from cash and cash equivalent investments
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
|
|
21,359
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
4,228
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
|
|
6,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on
investments non-control/non-affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
(1,393
|
)
|
Net realized gain on investments affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
|
|
(4,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
5,612
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
$
|
8,813
|
|
|
$
|
7,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per
share basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
19,415
|
|
|
$
|
36,617
|
|
|
$
|
54,247
|
|
|
$
|
113,037
|
|
|
$
|
182,105
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
21,788
|
|
|
|
27,193
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
3,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
23,185
|
|
|
$
|
43,819
|
|
|
$
|
58,944
|
|
|
$
|
136,210
|
|
|
$
|
213,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital/net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,609
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
Distribution/dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
SBA-guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
37,010
|
|
|
|
115,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,181
|
|
|
|
32,454
|
|
|
|
33,788
|
|
|
|
42,737
|
|
|
|
122,242
|
|
Total partners capital/shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
11,365
|
|
|
|
25,156
|
|
|
|
93,473
|
|
|
|
91,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital/net assets
|
|
$
|
23,185
|
|
|
$
|
43,819
|
|
|
$
|
58,944
|
|
|
$
|
136,210
|
|
|
$
|
213,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on investments
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Number of portfolio companies
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Expense ratios (annualized, as percentage of average net
assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Interest expense and deferred financing fees
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
SELECTED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth certain quarterly financial
information for each of the eight quarters ended with the
quarter ended December 31, 2008. This information was
derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of
results for the past fiscal year or for any future quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
3,863,984
|
|
|
$
|
5,020,091
|
|
|
$
|
5,869,637
|
|
|
$
|
6,605,786
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1,913,695
|
|
|
|
2,542,442
|
|
|
|
3,211,706
|
|
|
|
2,954,435
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
765,391
|
|
|
|
2,848,507
|
|
|
|
2,476,346
|
|
|
|
1,548,257
|
|
Net investment income per share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
2,112,116
|
|
|
$
|
3,287,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,594,287
|
|
|
$
|
3,742,216
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
804,730
|
|
|
|
1,643,998
|
|
|
|
1,992,001
|
|
|
|
1,982,480
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
1,065,835
|
|
|
|
2,230,084
|
|
|
|
3,366,681
|
|
|
|
2,150,498
|
|
Net investment income per share
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
12
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a number of
significant risks. In addition to the other information
contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement, you should consider carefully the following
information before making an investment in our common stock. The
risks set out below are not the only risks we face. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or not
presently deemed material by us might also impair our operations
and performance. If any of the following events occur, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. In such case, our net asset
value and the trading price of our common stock could decline,
and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business and Structure
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage and deploy capital effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on
our ability to effectively manage and deploy our capital, which
will depend, in turn, on our management teams ability to
identify, evaluate and monitor, and our ability to finance and
invest in, companies that meet our investment criteria. We
cannot assure you that we will achieve our investment objective.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis will be
largely a function of our management teams handling of the
investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive
and efficient services and our access to investments offering
acceptable terms. In addition to monitoring the performance of
our existing investments, members of our management team and our
investment professionals may also be called upon to provide
managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands
on their time may distract them or slow the rate of investment.
Even if we are able to grow and build upon our investment
operations in a manner commensurate with the increased capital
available to us as a result of an offering, any failure to
manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects. The results of our operations will
depend on many factors, including the availability of
opportunities for investment, readily accessible short and
long-term funding alternatives in the financial markets and
economic conditions. Furthermore, if we cannot successfully
operate our business or implement our investment policies and
strategies as described in this prospectus, or any prospectus
supplement, it could negatively impact our ability to pay
dividends and cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
Our
investment portfolio is and will continue to be recorded at fair
value as determined in good faith by our board of directors and,
as a result, there is and will continue to be uncertainty as to
the value of our portfolio investments.
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio
investments at market value or, if there is no readily available
market value, at fair value as determined by our board of
directors. Typically there is not a public market for the
securities of the privately held companies in which we have
invested and will generally continue to invest. As a result, we
value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in
good faith by our board of directors based on input from
management, a third party independent valuation firm and our
audit committee.
The determination of fair value and consequently, the amount of
unrealized gains and losses in our portfolio, is to a certain
degree subjective and dependent on the judgment of our board.
Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair
value of our investments include the nature and realizable value
of any collateral, the portfolio companys earnings and its
ability to make payments on its indebtedness, the markets in
which the portfolio company does business, comparison to
comparable publicly-traded companies, discounted cash flows and
other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and
particularly valuations of private securities and private
companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short
periods of time and may be based on estimates, our
determinations of fair value may differ materially from the
values that would
13
have been used if a ready market for these securities existed.
Due to this uncertainty, our fair value determinations may cause
our net asset value on a given date to materially understate or
overstate the value that we may ultimately realize upon one or
more of our investments. As a result, investors purchasing our
common stock based on an overstated net asset value would pay a
higher price than the value of our investments might warrant.
Conversely, investors selling shares during a period in which
the net asset value understates the value of our investments
will receive a lower price for their shares than the value of
our investments might warrant.
The
current state of the economy and the capital markets increases
the possibility of adverse effects on our financial position and
results of operations. Further economic downturns or recessions
could impair our portfolio companies financial position
and operating results and disproportionately affect the
industries in which we invest, which could, in turn, harm our
operating results and reduce our volume of new
investments.
During 2007 and 2008, the capital markets in the United States
and abroad appear to have entered into an economic downturn and
recession. Disruptions in the capital markets have increased the
spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk
securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the debt
capital markets. The longer this economic downturn persists, the
greater the probability that these risks could have an adverse
effect on our operations and financial results.
Many of the companies in which we have made or will make
investments may be susceptible to economic downturns or
recessions. An economic downturn or recession may affect the
ability of a company to repay our loans or engage in a liquidity
event, such as a sale, recapitalization or initial public
offering. An economic downturn could also disproportionately
impact the industries in which we invest, causing us to be more
vulnerable to losses in our portfolio. Therefore, our
non-performing assets are likely to increase and the value of
our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods.
Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of
collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our
equity investments. Economic downturns or recessions could lead
to financial losses in our portfolio and decreases in revenue,
net income and assets.
Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding
costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a
decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events
could prevent us from increasing our investment originations and
negatively impact our operating results.
We may
face increasing competition for investment
opportunities.
We compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds
(including private equity funds and mezzanine funds), as well as
traditional financial services companies such as commercial
banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative
investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, have begun to invest
in areas they have not traditionally invested in, including
making investments in lower middle market companies. As a result
of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities
in lower middle market companies may intensify. Many of our
competitors are substantially larger and have considerably
greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.
For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital
and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In
addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk
tolerances or different risk assessments than we have. These
characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider
variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer
better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to
do. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our
competitors pricing, terms and structure. If we are forced
to match our competitors pricing, terms and structure, we
may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments
or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant part
of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market
for investments in lower middle market companies is underserved
by traditional commercial banks and other financing sources. A
significant increase in the number
and/or the
size of our competitors in this target market could force us to
accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many of
our competitors have greater experience operating under, or are
not subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act
imposes on us as a BDC.
14
We are
dependent upon our key investment personnel for our future
success.
We depend on the members of our senior management team,
particularly Garland S. Tucker III, Brent P.W. Burgess and
Steven C. Lilly, for the identification, final selection,
structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. These
employees have critical industry experience and relationships
that we rely on to implement our business plan. If we lose the
services of these individuals, we may not be able to operate our
business as we expect, and our ability to compete could be
harmed, which could cause our operating results to suffer. We
entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Tucker,
Burgess and Lilly upon consummation of our initial public
offering.
Our
success depends on attracting and retaining qualified personnel
in a competitive environment.
We have recently experienced increased competition in attracting
and retaining qualified personnel, particularly investment
professionals, and we may be unable to maintain or grow our
business if we cannot attract and retain such personnel. Our
ability to attract and retain personnel with the requisite
credentials, experience and skills depends on several factors
including, but not limited to, our ability to offer competitive
wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. Many of
the entities, including investment funds (such as private equity
funds and mezzanine funds) and traditional financial services
companies, with which we compete for experienced personnel have
greater resources than we have.
The competitive environment for qualified personnel may require
us to take certain measures to ensure that we are able to
attract and retain experienced personnel. Such measures may
include increasing the attractiveness of our overall
compensation packages, altering the structure of our
compensation packages through the use of additional forms of
compensation, or other steps. The inability to attract and
retain experienced personnel could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our
business model depends to a significant extent upon strong
referral relationships, and our inability to maintain or develop
these relationships, as well as the failure of these
relationships to generate investment opportunities, could
adversely affect our business.
We expect that members of our management team will maintain
their relationships with financial institutions, private equity
and other non-bank investors, investment bankers, commercial
bankers, attorneys, accountants and consultants, and we will
rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide
us with potential investment opportunities. If our management
team fails to maintain its existing relationships or develop new
relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment
opportunities, we will not be able to grow our investment
portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom members of our
management team have relationships are not obligated to provide
us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no
assurance that such relationships will generate investment
opportunities for us.
We
have limited operating history as a business development company
and as a regulated investment company, which may impair your
ability to assess our prospects.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
BDCs. Prior to the consummation of our initial public offering
in February 2007, we had not operated, and our management team
had no experience operating, as a BDC under the 1940 Act or as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a result, we have limited
operating results under these regulatory frameworks that can
demonstrate to you either their effect on our business or our
ability to manage our business under these frameworks. Our
management teams limited experience in managing a
portfolio of assets under such constraints may hinder our
ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities
and, as a result, achieve our investment objective. Furthermore,
any failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by
the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action
against us. If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as
a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would
further decrease our operating flexibility.
15
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company will
affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional
capital.
Our business will require capital to operate and grow. We may
acquire such additional capital from the following sources:
Senior Securities. Currently we, through
Triangle SBIC, issue debt securities guaranteed by the SBA. In
the future, we may issue debt securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which
we refer collectively as senior securities. As a result of
issuing senior securities, we will be exposed to additional
risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a
BDC, to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our
asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200%
after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our
assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that
happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments
and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of
our debt at a time when such sales
and/or
repayments may be disadvantageous.
|
|
|
|
Any amounts that we use to service our debt or make payments on
preferred stock will not be available for dividends to our
common stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any senior securities or other indebtedness we
issue will be governed by an indenture or other instrument
containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility.
Additionally, some of these securities or other indebtedness may
be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such
securities and other indebtedness, we may be required to abide
by operating and investment guidelines that further restrict
operating and financial flexibility.
|
|
|
|
We and, indirectly, our stockholders will bear the cost of
issuing and servicing such securities and other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock or any convertible or exchangeable securities
that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and
privileges more favorable than those of our common stock,
including separate voting rights and could delay or prevent a
transaction or a change in control to the detriment of the
holders of our common stock.
|
Additional Common Stock. We are not generally
able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net
asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock,
warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a
price below the current net asset value of the common stock if
our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best
interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such
sale. At our Annual Stockholders Meeting on May 7, 2008,
our stockholders voted to allow us to issue common stock at a
price below net asset value per share for a period of one year
ending May 6, 2009. Our stockholders did not specify a
maximum discount below net asset value at which we are able to
issue our common stock; however, we do not intend to issue
shares of our common stock below net asset value unless our
board of directors determines that it would be in our
stockholders best interests to do so. In any such case,
however, the price at which our common stock are to be issued
and sold may not be less than a price which, in the
determination of our board of directors, closely approximates
the market value of such securities (less any distributing
commission or discount). We may also make rights offerings to
our stockholders (though not in conjunction with this
prospectus) at prices per share less than the net asset value
per share, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or
senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our
common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at
that time would decrease, and they may experience dilution.
Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to
issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on
favorable terms or at all.
16
Our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Triangle SBIC, is licensed by the SBA,
and therefore subject to SBA regulations.
Triangle SBIC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, is licensed to act
as a small business investment company and is regulated by the
SBA. Under current SBA regulations, a licensed SBIC can provide
capital to those entities that have a tangible net worth not
exceeding $18.0 million and an average annual net income
after federal income taxes not exceeding $6.0 million for
the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, a licensed SBIC
must devote 20.0% of its investment activity to those entities
that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million
and an average annual net income after federal income taxes not
exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal
years. The SBA also places certain limitations on the financing
terms of investments by SBICs in portfolio companies and
prohibits SBICs from providing funds for certain purposes or to
businesses in a few prohibited industries. Compliance with SBA
requirements may cause Triangle SBIC to forego attractive
investment opportunities that are not permitted under SBA
regulations.
Further, the SBA regulations require that a licensed SBIC be
periodically examined and audited by the SBA to determine its
compliance with the relevant SBA regulations. The SBA prohibits,
without prior SBA approval, a change of control of
an SBIC or transfers that would result in any person (or a group
of persons acting in concert) owning 10.0% or more of a class of
capital stock of a licensed SBIC. If Triangle SBIC fails to
comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending
on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit Triangle
SBICs use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures
immediately due and payable,
and/or limit
Triangle SBIC from making new investments. In addition, the SBA
can revoke or suspend a license for willful or repeated
violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any
provision of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or any
rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. Such actions by the
SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because Triangle SBIC
is our wholly owned subsidiary.
Because
we borrow money, the potential for gain or loss on amounts
invested in us is magnified and may increase the risk of
investing in us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for
gain or loss on invested equity capital. As we intend to use
leverage to partially finance our investments, you will
experience increased risks of investing in our common stock. We,
through Triangle SBIC, issue debt securities guaranteed by the
SBA and sold in the capital markets. As a result of its
guarantee of the debt securities, the SBA has fixed dollar
claims on Triangle SBICs assets that are superior to the
claims of our common stockholders. We may also borrow from banks
and other lenders in the future. If the value of our assets
increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value
attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than
it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of
our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to
decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not
leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of
interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net
investment income to increase more than it would without the
leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net
investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had
we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our
ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is
generally considered a speculative investment technique.
As a BDC, we are generally required to meet a coverage ratio of
total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities,
which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we
may issue in the future, of at least 200%. If this ratio
declines below 200%, we may not be able to incur additional debt
and may need to sell a portion of our investments to repay some
debt when it is disadvantageous to do so, and we may not be able
to make distributions.
On December 31, 2008, we, through Triangle SBIC, had
$115.1 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed by
the SBA, which had a weighted average annualized interest cost
of approximately 5.81%. The calculation of this weighted average
interest rate includes the interim rates charged on SBA
guaranteed debentures that have not yet been pooled.
17
Illustration. The following table illustrates
the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our
common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses.
The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual
returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Return on our Portfolio
|
|
|
(Net of Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corresponding net return to stockholder(1)
|
|
|
(30.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes $213.7 million in total assets, $115.1 million
in debt outstanding, $91.4 million in net assets and an
average cost of funds of 5.8%, which was the weighted average
borrowing cost on our borrowings at December 31, 2008. |
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives may depend in
part on our ability to achieve additional leverage on favorable
terms by issuing debentures guaranteed by the SBA or by
borrowing from banks, or insurance companies, and there can be
no assurance that such additional leverage can in fact be
achieved.
SBA
regulations limit the outstanding dollar amount of SBA
guaranteed debentures that may be issued by an SBIC or group of
SBICs under common control.
The SBA regulations currently limit the dollar amount of SBA
guaranteed debentures that can be issued by any one SBIC or
group of SBICs under common control to $150.0 million (such
amount being subject to an annual inflation adjustment).
Moreover, an SBIC may not borrow an amount in excess of two
times its regulatory capital. As of December 31, 2008,
Triangle SBIC had issued $115.1 million in debentures
guaranteed by the SBA. With $65.3 million of regulatory
capital as of December 31, 2008, Triangle SBIC has the
current capacity to issue up to a total of $130.6 million
of SBA guaranteed debentures. While we cannot presently predict
whether or not we will borrow the maximum permitted amount, if
we reach the maximum dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures
permitted, and thereafter require additional capital, our cost
of capital may increase, and there is no assurance that we will
be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.
Moreover, Triangle SBICs current status as an SBIC does
not automatically assure that Triangle SBIC will continue to
receive SBA guaranteed debenture funding. Receipt of SBA
leverage funding is dependent upon Triangle SBIC continuing to
be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies and there
being funding available. The amount of SBA leverage funding
available to SBICs is dependent upon annual Congressional
authorizations and in the future may be subject to annual
Congressional appropriations. There can be no assurance that
there will be sufficient debenture funding available at the
times desired by Triangle SBIC.
The debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a maturity of ten
years and require semi-annual payments of interest. Triangle
SBIC will need to generate sufficient cash flow to make required
interest payments on the debentures. If Triangle SBIC is unable
to meet its financial obligations under the debentures, the SBA,
as a creditor, will have a superior claim to Triangle
SBICs assets over our stockholders in the event we
liquidate Triangle SBIC or the SBA exercises its remedies under
such debentures as the result of a default by us. In addition,
the SBA must approve our independent directors before Triangle
SBIC will be permitted to issue additional debentures guaranteed
by the SBA.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including our ability or
inability to make investments in companies that meet our
investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt
securities we acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in
and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized
gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in
our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of
these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon
as being indicative of performance in future periods.
18
Our
ability to enter into and exit investment transactions with our
affiliates is restricted.
Except in those instances where we have received prior exemptive
relief from the SEC, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from
knowingly participating in certain transactions with our
affiliates without the prior approval of our independent
directors. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5.0% or
more of our outstanding voting securities is deemed our
affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we are generally
prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such
affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent
directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits joint
transactions with an affiliate, which could include investments
in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different
times), without prior approval of our independent directors. If
a person acquires more than 25.0% of our voting securities, we
will be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or
to such person, or entering into joint transactions with such
person, absent the prior approval of the SEC. These restrictions
could limit or prohibit us from making certain attractive
investments that we might otherwise make absent such
restrictions.
Our
board of directors may change our operating policies and
strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, the
effects of which may be adverse.
Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive our
current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies
without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot
predict the effect any changes to our current operating
policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our
business, net asset value, operating results and value of our
stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could
negatively impact our ability to pay you dividends and cause you
to lose all or part of your investment. Moreover, we will have
significant flexibility in investing the net proceeds of the
offering and may use the net proceeds from an offering in ways
with which investors may not agree or for purposes other than
those contemplated at the time of the offering.
We
will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable
to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M
of the Code, which will adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
To obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must
meet the following annual distribution, income source and asset
diversification requirements.
We have elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code, which
generally will allow us to avoid being subject to an entity
level tax. To obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the
Code, we must meet the following annual distribution, income
source and asset diversification requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
The annual distribution requirement for a RIC will be satisfied
if we distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least
90.0% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. We will be subject to a 4.0% nondeductible
federal excise tax, however, to the extent that we do not
satisfy certain additional minimum distribution requirements on
a calendar year basis. We qualified for RIC tax treatment in
2007. For more information regarding tax treatment, see
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations. Because we use debt financing, we are
subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the
1940 Act and may in the future become subject to certain
financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could,
under certain circumstances, restrict us from making
distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement.
If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we could
fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to
corporate-level income tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at
least 90.0% of our income for each year from distributions,
interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar
sources.
|
|
|
|
The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we
meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of
each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement,
at least 50.0% of the value of our assets must consist of cash,
cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other acceptable securities; and no more than
25.0% of the value of our assets can
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
be invested in the securities, other than U.S. government
securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or
more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable
Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or
related trades or businesses or of certain qualified
publicly traded partnerships. Failure to meet these
requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain
investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status.
Because most of our investments will be in private companies,
and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions
could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in
substantial losses.
|
If we fail to qualify for or maintain RIC tax treatment for any
reason and are subject to corporate income tax, the resulting
corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the
amount of income available for distribution and the amount of
our distributions.
We may
not be able to pay you dividends, our dividends may not grow
over time, and a portion of dividends paid to you may be a
return of capital.
We intend to pay quarterly dividends to our stockholders out of
assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you
that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to
make a specified level of cash dividends or year-to-year
increases in cash dividends. Our ability to pay dividends might
be harmed by, among other things, the risk factors described in
this prospectus. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset
coverage test applicable to us as a BDC can limit our ability to
pay dividends. All dividends will be paid at the discretion of
our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our
financial condition, maintenance of our RIC status, compliance
with applicable BDC regulations, Triangle SBICs compliance
with applicable SBIC regulations and such other factors as our
board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We
cannot assure you that we will pay dividends to our stockholders
in the future.
When we make quarterly distributions, we will be required to
determine the extent to which such distributions are paid out of
current or accumulated earnings, recognized capital gains or
capital. To the extent there is a return of capital, investors
will be required to reduce their basis in our stock for federal
tax purposes.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income
certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as
original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants
in connection with the origination of a loan or possibly in
other circumstances, or contractual PIK interest, which
represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and
due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discounts
or increases in loan balances as a result of contractual PIK
arrangements will be included in income before we receive any
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement necessary
to obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code.
Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at
times and/or
at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional
debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations for
this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. For additional
discussion regarding the tax implications of a RIC, please see
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations Taxation as a RIC.
Triangle
SBIC, as an SBIC, may be unable to make distributions to us that
will enable us to meet regulated investment company
requirements, which could result in the imposition of an
entity-level tax.
In order for us to continue to qualify as a RIC, we will be
required to distribute on an annual basis substantially all of
our taxable income, including income from our subsidiaries,
including Triangle SBIC. As all of our investments will
initially be made by Triangle SBIC, we will be substantially
dependent on Triangle
20
SBIC for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC
distribution requirements. Triangle SBIC may be limited by the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations
governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that
may be necessary to enable us to qualify as a RIC. We may have
to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for Triangle
SBIC to make certain distributions to maintain our status as a
RIC. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver
and if Triangle SBIC is unable to obtain a waiver, compliance
with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC status and a
consequent imposition of an entity-level tax on us.
Because
we intend to distribute substantially all of our income to our
stockholders to maintain our status as a regulated investment
company, we will continue to need additional capital to finance
our growth and regulations governing our operation as a business
development company will affect our ability to, and the way in
which we, raise additional capital.
In order to satisfy the requirements applicable to a RIC and to
avoid payment of excise taxes, we intend to distribute to our
stockholders substantially all of our net ordinary income and
net capital gain income except for certain net long-term capital
gains recognized after we become a RIC, some or all of which we
may retain, pay applicable income taxes with respect thereto,
and elect to treat as deemed distributions to our stockholders.
As a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of
total assets to total senior securities, which includes all of
our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the
future, of at least 200.0%. This requirement limits the amount
that we may borrow. If the value of our assets declines, we may
be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be
required to sell a portion of our investments or sell additional
common stock and, depending on the nature of our leverage, to
repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales
may be disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of additional
securities could dilute the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders in us.
While we expect to be able to borrow and to issue additional
debt and equity securities, we cannot assure you that debt and
equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or
at all. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be
forced to curtail or cease new investment activities, and our
net asset value could decline. In addition, as a BDC, we
generally are not permitted to issue equity securities priced
below net asset value without stockholder approval. At our
Annual Stockholders Meeting on May 7, 2008, our
stockholders voted to allow us to issue common stock at a price
below net asset value per share for a period of one year ending
May 6, 2009. Our stockholders did not specify a maximum
discount below net asset value at which we are able to issue our
common stock; however, we do not intend to issue shares of our
common stock below net asset value unless our board of directors
determines that it would be in our stockholders best
interests to do so. For an illustration on the potential
dilutive effect of an offering of our common stock at a price
below net asset value, please see the illustration below.
Illustration: Examples of Dilutive Effect of the Issuance of
Shares Below Net Asset Value. The following table
illustrates the level of net asset value dilution that would be
experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in three different
hypothetical offerings of different sizes and levels of discount
from net asset value per share, although it is not possible to
predict the level of market price decline that may occur. Actual
sales prices and discounts may differ from the presentation
below.
Assume that Company XYZ has 1,000,000 common shares outstanding,
$15,000,000 in total assets and $5,000,000 in total liabilities.
The current net asset value and net asset value per share are
thus $10,000,000 and $10.00. The table illustrates the dilutive
effect on nonparticipating Stockholder A of (1) an offering
of 50,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.50
per share after offering expenses and commission (a 5% discount
from net asset value), (2) an offering of
100,000 shares (10% of the outstanding shares) at $9.00 per
share after offering expenses and commissions (a 10% discount
from net asset value) and (3) an offering of
200,000 shares (20% of the outstanding shares) at $8.00 per
share after offering expenses and commissions (a 20% discount
from net asset value). The acronym NAV stands for
net asset value.
In any offering of common stock, we will present the actual
dilution to stockholders in table form in the prospectus
supplement that is specific to that offering.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution to Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
|
(4.76
|
)%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
(9.09
|
)%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
(16.67
|
)%
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
99,762
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
99,091
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
96,667
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.00 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00
per Share)
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes that Stockholder A does not purchase additional shares
in equity offering of shares below NAV. |
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business or cause us to alter our business
strategy.
We, Triangle SBIC, and our portfolio companies will be subject
to regulation at the local, state and federal level. New
legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or
regulations could be adopted, including those governing the
types of investments we are permitted to make, any of which
could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive
effect. In addition, any change to the SBAs current
debenture program could have a significant impact on our ability
to obtain lower-cost leverage and, therefore, our competitive
advantage over other finance companies.
Additionally, any changes to the laws and regulations governing
our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to
alter our investment strategy in order to avail ourselves of new
or different opportunities. Such changes could result in
material differences to the strategies and plans set forth in
this prospectus and may result in our investment focus shifting
from the areas of expertise of our management team to other
types of investments in which our management team may have less
expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such changes, if
they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and the value of your investment.
Efforts
to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will involve significant
expenditures, and non-compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may
adversely affect us.
We are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the
related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Among
other requirements, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, our
management is required to report on our internal controls over
financial reporting. We are required to review on an annual
basis our internal controls over financial reporting, and on a
quarterly and annual basis to evaluate and disclose significant
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting. We
have and expect to continue to incur significant expenses
related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
22
Act, which will negatively impact our financial performance and
our ability to make distributions. In addition, this process
results in a diversion of managements time and attention.
Since we have a limited operating history as a company subject
to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we cannot assure you that our
internal controls over financial reporting will continue to be
effective. In the event that we are unable to maintain
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we may
be adversely affected.
Risks
Related to Our Investments
Our
investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could
lose all or part of our investment.
Investing in lower middle market companies involves a number of
significant risks. Among other things, these companies:
|
|
|
|
|
may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet
their obligations under their debt instruments that we hold,
which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any
collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any
guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio
companies that we may have obtained in connection with our
investment, as well as a corresponding decrease in the value of
the equity components of our investments;
|
|
|
|
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines,
smaller market shares
and/or
significant customer concentrations than larger businesses,
which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors
actions and market conditions, as well as general economic
downturns;
|
|
|
|
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts
of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability,
resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could
have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in
turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
generally have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly
changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk
of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital
to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position; and
|
|
|
|
generally have less publicly available information about their
businesses, operations and financial condition. We are required
to rely on the ability of our management team and investment
professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the
potential returns from investing in these companies. If we are
unable to uncover all material information about these
companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision,
and may lose all or part of our investment.
|
In addition, in the course of providing significant managerial
assistance to certain of our portfolio companies, certain of our
officers and directors may serve as directors on the boards of
such companies. To the extent that litigation arises out of our
investments in these companies, our officers and directors may
be named as defendants in such litigation, which could result in
an expenditure of funds (through our indemnification of such
officers and directors) and the diversion of management time and
resources.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We invest, and will continue to invest in companies whose
securities are not publicly traded, and whose securities will be
subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will
otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The
illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult for us to
sell these investments when desired. In addition, if we are
required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly,
we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had
previously recorded these investments. As a result, we do not
expect to achieve liquidity in our investments in the near-term.
Our investments are usually subject to contractual or legal
restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there
is usually no established trading market for such investments.
The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult
for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a
result, we may suffer losses.
23
We are
a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the
1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a
single issuer.
We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within
the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited
by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets
that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. To the
extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a
small number of issuers, our net asset value may fluctuate to a
greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as
a result of changes in the financial condition or the
markets assessment of the issuer. We may also be more
susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than
a diversified investment company. Beyond our regulated
investment company asset diversification requirements and
certain SBA diversification requirements for our investments
held by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Triangle Mezzanine
Fund LLLP, we do not have fixed guidelines for
diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in
relatively few portfolio companies.
We may
not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in
our portfolio companies.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional
investments in our portfolio companies. After our initial
investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from
time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have
the opportunity to increase our investment through the exercise
of a warrant to purchase common stock. There is no assurance
that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make,
follow-on investments. Any decisions not to make a follow-on
investment or any inability on our part to make such an
investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in
need of such an investment, may result in a missed opportunity
for us to increase our participation in a successful operation
or may reduce the expected yield on the investment.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or
senior to, our investments in such companies.
We invest primarily in senior subordinated debt as well as
equity issued by lower middle market companies. Our portfolio
companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt
that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we
invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the
holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with
respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the
event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments
ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors,
such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use
for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking
equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have
to share on an equal basis any distributions with other
creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency,
liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the
relevant portfolio company.
There
may be circumstances where our debt investments could be
subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject
to lender liability claims.
Even though we may have structured certain of our investments as
senior loans, if one of our portfolio companies were to go
bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances and based
upon principles of equitable subordination as defined by
existing case law, a bankruptcy court could subordinate all or a
portion of our claim to that of other creditors and transfer any
lien securing such subordinated claim to the bankruptcy estate.
The principles of equitable subordination defined by case law
have generally indicated that a claim may be subordinated only
if its holder is guilty of misconduct or where the senior loan
is re-characterized as an equity investment and the senior
lender has actually provided significant managerial assistance
to the bankrupt debtor. We may also be subject to lender
liability claims for actions taken by us with respect to a
borrowers business or instances where we exercise control
over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject
to a lenders liability claim, including as a result of
actions taken in rendering significant
24
managerial assistance or actions to compel and collect payments
from the borrower outside the ordinary course of business.
Second
priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our
portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior
creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the
value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full
both the first priority creditors and us.
Certain loans that we make are secured by a second priority
security interest in the same collateral pledged by a portfolio
company to secure senior debt owed by the portfolio company to
commercial banks or other traditional lenders. Often the senior
lender has procured covenants from the portfolio company
prohibiting the incurrence of additional secured debt without
the senior lenders consent. Prior to and as a condition of
permitting the portfolio company to borrow money from us secured
by the same collateral pledged to the senior lender, the senior
lender will require assurances that it will control the
disposition of any collateral in the event of bankruptcy or
other default. In many such cases, the senior lender will
require us to enter into an intercreditor agreement
prior to permitting the portfolio company to borrow from us.
Typically the intercreditor agreements we are requested to
execute expressly subordinate our debt instruments to those held
by the senior lender and further provide that the senior lender
shall control: (1) the commencement of foreclosure or other
proceedings to liquidate and collect on the collateral;
(2) the nature, timing and conduct of foreclosure or other
collection proceedings; (3) the amendment of any collateral
document; (4) the release of the security interests in
respect of any collateral; and (5) the waiver of defaults
under any security agreement. Because of the control we may cede
to senior lenders under intercreditor agreements we may enter,
we may be unable to realize the proceeds of any collateral
securing some of our loans.
Finally, the value of the collateral securing our debt
investment will ultimately depend on market and economic
conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors.
Therefore, there can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any,
from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be
sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by our second
priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured
by the senior lenders first priority liens on the
collateral. There is also a risk that such collateral securing
our investments may decrease in value over time, may be
difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to
appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of
the portfolio company and market conditions. If such proceeds
are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan
obligations secured by our second priority liens, then we, to
the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the
collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the
companys remaining assets, if any.
If we
do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying
assets, we could fail to qualify as a business development
company or be precluded from investing according to our current
business strategy.
As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than
qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after
giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70.0% of our total
assets are qualifying assets. For further detail, see
Regulation.
We believe that substantially all of our investments will
constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from
investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such
investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940
Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in
qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules
could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing
portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our
position).
We are
a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the
1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a
single issuer.
We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within
the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited
by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets
that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. To the
extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a
small number
25
of issuers, our net asset value may fluctuate to a greater
extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result
of changes in the financial condition or the markets
assessment of the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any
single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified
investment company. Beyond our RIC asset diversification
requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for
diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in
relatively few portfolio companies.
We
generally will not control our portfolio
companies.
We do not, and do not expect to, control most of our portfolio
companies, even though we may have board representation or board
observation rights, and our debt agreements may contain certain
restrictive covenants. As a result, we are subject to the risk
that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business
decisions with which we disagree and the management of such
company, as representatives of the holders of their common
equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not
serve our interests as debt investors. Due to the lack of
liquidity for our investments in non-traded companies, we may
not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio
companies as readily as we would like or at an appropriate
valuation. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions
that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
Our
financial results may be affected adversely if one or more of
our portfolio investments defaults on its loans or fails to
perform as we expect.
Our portfolio consists primarily of debt and equity investments
in privately owned middle-market businesses. Compared to larger
publicly owned companies, these middle-market companies may be
in a weaker financial position and experience wider variations
in their operating results, which may make them more vulnerable
to economic downturns. Typically, these companies need more
capital to compete; however, their access to capital is limited
and their cost of capital is often higher than that of their
competitors. Our portfolio companies face intense competition
from larger companies with greater financial, technical and
marketing resources and their success typically depends on the
management talents and efforts of an individual or a small group
of persons. The loss of any of their key employees could affect
their ability to compete effectively and harm their financial
condition. Further, some of these companies conduct business in
regulated industries that are susceptible to regulatory changes.
These factors could impair the cash flow of our portfolio
companies and result in other events, such as bankruptcy. These
events could limit a portfolio companys ability to repay
their obligations to us, which may have an adverse affect on the
return on, or the recovery of, our investment in these
businesses. Deterioration in a borrowers financial
condition and prospects may be accompanied by deterioration in
the value of the loans collateral.
Some of these companies cannot obtain financing from public
capital markets or from traditional credit sources, such as
commercial banks. Accordingly, loans made to these types of
companies pose a higher default risk, than loans made to
companies who have access to traditional credit sources.
Generally, little, if any, public information is available about
such companies. Therefore, we must rely on our employees
diligence to obtain the information needed to make well-informed
investment decisions. If we do not uncover material information
about these companies, we may not make a fully informed
investment decision, which could, in turn cause us to lose money
on our investments.
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic
slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt
investments during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing
assets are likely to increase, and the value of our portfolio is
likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic
conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing
some of our debt investments and the value of our equity
investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to
financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in investment
income, net investment income and assets. Unfavorable economic
conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our
access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders
not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from
increasing investments and harm our operating results.
26
An economic downturn could disproportionately impact the
industries in which we invest, causing us to be more vulnerable
to losses in our portfolio, which could negatively impact our
financial results. Unfavorable economic conditions also could
increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital
markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit
to us. These events could prevent us from increasing our loan
originations and investments and negatively impact our financial
results.
Defaults
by our portfolio companies will harm our operating
results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.
Any
unrealized losses we experience on our loan portfolio may be an
indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our
income available for distribution.
As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market
value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at the fair value
as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. Decreases
in the market values or fair values of our investments will be
recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in
our loan portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio
companys inability to meet its repayment obligations to us
with respect to the affected loans. This could result in
realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of
our income available for distribution in future periods.
Prepayments
of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could
adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return
on equity.
We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our
portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this
occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in temporary
investments, pending their future investment in new portfolio
companies. These temporary investments will typically have
substantially lower yields than the debt being prepaid and we
could experience significant delays in reinvesting these
amounts. Any future investment in a new portfolio company may
also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a
result, our results of operations could be materially adversely
affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elect to
prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments could
negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a
decline in the market price of our common stock.
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
Most of our debt investments will bear interest at fixed rates,
and the value of these investments could be negatively affected
by increases in market interest rates. In addition, an increase
in interest rates would make it more expensive to use debt to
finance our investments. As a result, a significant increase in
market interest rates could both reduce the value of our
portfolio investments and increase our cost of capital, which
would reduce our net investment income. Also, an increase in
interest rates available to investors could make an investment
in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to
increase our dividend rate, a situation which could reduce the
value of our common stock. Conversely, a decrease in interest
rates may have an adverse impact on our returns by requiring us
to seek lower yields on our debt investments and by increasing
the risk that our portfolio companies will prepay our debt
investments, resulting in the need to redeploy capital at
potentially lower rates.
We may
not realize gains from our equity investments.
Certain investments that we have made in the past and may make
in the future include warrants or other equity securities.
Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant
risks, including the risk of
27
further dilution as a result of additional issuances, inability
to access additional capital and failure to pay current
distributions. Investments in preferred securities involve
special risks, such as the risk of deferred distributions,
credit risk, illiquidity and limited voting rights. In addition,
we may from time to time make non-control, equity co-investments
in companies in conjunction with private equity sponsors. Our
goal is ultimately to realize gains upon our disposition of such
equity interests. However, the equity interests we receive may
not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value.
Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity
interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition
of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any
other losses we experience. We also may be unable to realize any
value if a portfolio company does not have a liquidity event,
such as a sale of the business, recapitalization or public
offering, which would allow us to sell the underlying equity
interests. We often seek puts or similar rights to give us the
right to sell our equity securities back to the portfolio
company issuer. We may be unable to exercise these puts rights
for the consideration provided in our investment documents if
the issuer is in financial distress.
Risks
Relating to an Offering of Our Common Stock
We may
be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds
raised from an offering on acceptable terms, which would harm
our financial condition and operating results.
Delays in investing the net proceeds raised in an offering may
cause our performance to be worse than that of other fully
invested business development companies or other lenders or
investors pursuing comparable investment strategies. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to identify any investments that
meet our investment objective or that any investment that we
make will produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest
the net proceeds of any offering on acceptable terms within the
time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our
financial condition and operating results.
We anticipate that, depending on market conditions and the
amount of any particular offering, it may take a substantial
period of time to invest substantially all of the net proceeds
of any offering in securities meeting our investment objective.
During this period, we will invest the net proceeds of any
offering primarily in cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements and
high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from
the time of investment, which may produce returns that are
significantly lower than the returns which we expect to achieve
when our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our
investment objective. As a result, any dividends that we pay
during such period may be substantially lower than the dividends
that we may be able to pay when our portfolio is fully invested
in securities meeting our investment objective. In addition,
until such time as the net proceeds of any offering are invested
in securities meeting our investment objective, the market price
for our common stock may decline. Thus, the initial return on
your investment may be lower than when, if ever, our portfolio
is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective.
Shares
of closed-end investment companies, including business
development companies, frequently trade at a discount to their
net asset value.
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including BDCs,
frequently trade at a discount from net asset value. This
characteristic of closed-end investment companies and BDCs is
separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per
share may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock
will trade at, above or below net asset value. In addition, if
our common stock trades below net asset value, we will generally
not be able to issue additional common stock at the market price
without first obtaining the approval of our stockholders and our
independent directors. At our Annual Stockholders Meeting on
May 7, 2008, our stockholders voted to allow us to issue
common stock at a price below net asset value per share for a
period of one year ending May 6, 2009. Our stockholders did
not specify a maximum discount below net asset value at which we
are able to issue our common stock; however, we do not intend to
issue shares of our common stock below net asset value unless
our board of directors determines that it would be in our
stockholders best interests to do so.
28
If we
sell common stock at a discount to our net asset value per
share, stockholders who do not participate in such sale will
experience immediate dilution in an amount that may be
material.
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2008,
our stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited
number of shares of our common stock at any level of discount
from net asset value per share during the one year period
following such approval. The issuance or sale by us of shares of
our common stock at a discount to net asset value poses a risk
of dilution to our stockholders. In particular, stockholders who
do not purchase additional shares at or below the discounted
price in proportion to their current ownership will experience
an immediate decrease in net asset value per share (as well as
in the aggregate net asset value of their shares if they do not
participate at all). These stockholders will also experience a
disproportionately greater decrease in their participation on
our earnings and assets and their voting power than the increase
we experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting
interests from such issuances or sale. They also may experience
a reduction in the market price of our common stock. For
additional information and hypothetical examples of these risks,
see Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value, and
for actual dilution illustrations specific to an offering, see
the prospectus supplement pursuant to which such sale is made.
Investing
in our common stock may involve an above average degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of
principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly
speculative, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
The
market price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate
significantly.
Fluctuations in the trading prices of our shares may adversely
affect the liquidity of the trading market for our shares and,
if we seek to raise capital through future equity financings,
our ability to raise such equity capital. The market price and
liquidity of the market for our common stock may be
significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are
beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of BDCs or other companies in our sector, which are
not necessarily related to the operating performance of these
companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs, BDCs or SBICs;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain certain exemptive relief from the SEC;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC status or Triangle SBICs status as an SBIC;
|
|
|
|
changes in our earnings or variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in investment income or net investment income or
any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or
securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
the operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
departure of our key personnel;
|
|
|
|
global or national credit market changes; and
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors.
|
As illustrated by recent events in the market for subprime
loans, and mortgage securities generally, the market for any
security is subject to volatility. The loans and securities
purchased by us and issued by us are no exception to this
fundamental investment truism that prices will fluctuate,
although we lack any material exposure to the subprime and
mortgage markets.
29
If a
substantial number of shares become available for sale and are
sold in a short period of time, the market price of our common
stock could decline.
As of December 31, 2008, we had 6,917,363 shares of
common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our
common stock, or the availability of shares for sale, including
those offered hereby, could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of our common stock. If this occurs and continues,
it could impair our ability to raise additional capital through
the sale of equity securities should we desire to do so.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of
incorporation and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have
an adverse impact on the price of our common
stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of
incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may have the
effect of discouraging, delaying or making difficult a change in
control of our Company or the removal of our incumbent
directors. Specifically, our board of directors may adopt
resolutions to classify our board of directors so that
stockholders do not elect every director on an annual basis.
Also, our articles of incorporation provide that a director may
be removed only for cause by the vote of at least two-thirds of
the votes entitled to be cast for the election of directors
generally. In addition, our bylaws provide that a special
meeting of stockholders may be called by the stockholders only
upon the written request of the stockholders entitled to cast at
least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the
meeting.
In addition, subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act, our
articles of incorporation permit our board of directors, without
stockholder action, to authorize the issuance of shares of stock
in one or more classes or series, including preferred stock. See
Description of Our Securities. Subject to compliance
with the 1940 Act, our board of directors may, without
stockholder action, amend our articles of incorporation to
increase the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that we have authority to issue. The existence of these
provisions, among others, may have a negative impact on the
price of our common stock and may discourage third party bids
for ownership of our company. These provisions may prevent any
premiums being offered to you for our common stock.
Terrorist
attacks, acts of war or national disasters may affect any market
for our common stock, impact the businesses in which we invest
and harm our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Terrorist acts, acts of war or national disasters may disrupt
our operations, as well as the operations of the businesses in
which we invest. Such acts have created, and continue to create,
economic and political uncertainties and have contributed to
global economic instability. Future terrorist activities,
military or security operations, or natural disasters could
further weaken the domestic/global economies and create
additional uncertainties, which may negatively impact the
businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly and, in
turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business,
operating results and financial condition. Losses from terrorist
attacks and natural disasters are generally uninsurable.
We
could face losses and potential liability if intrusion, viruses
or similar disruptions to our technology jeopardize our
confidential information or that of users of our
technology.
Although we have implemented, and will continue to implement,
security measures, our technology platform is and will continue
to be vulnerable to intrusion, computer viruses or similar
disruptive problems caused by transmission from unauthorized
users. The misappropriation of proprietary information could
expose us to a risk of loss or litigation.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this prospectus and the accompanying
prospectus supplement, if any, constitute forward-looking
statements because they relate to future events or our future
performance or financial condition. The forward-looking
statements contained in this prospectus may include statements
as to:
|
|
|
|
|
our future operating results;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies;
|
|
|
|
the impact of the investments that we expect to make;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives;
|
|
|
|
our expected financings and investments;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our
portfolio companies.
|
In addition, words such as anticipate,
believe, expect and intend
indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all
forward-looking statements include these words. The
forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from those implied or expressed in the
forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors
set forth in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement, if any.
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or
the economy generally due to terrorism; and
|
|
|
|
future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our
operating areas.
|
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus
or the accompanying prospectus supplement, if any. Although we
undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional
disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports
that we file with the SEC, including annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K.
FORMATION
TRANSACTIONS
Triangle Capital Corporation is a recently organized Maryland
corporation, formed on October 10, 2006, for the purposes
of acquiring 100% of the equity interests in Triangle SBIC and
its general partner, TML, raising capital in our IPO, which was
completed in February 2007 and thereafter operating as an
internally managed business development company under the 1940
Act.
On February 21, 2007, concurrently with the closing of our
IPO, we consummated the following formation transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Triangle Capital Corporation acquired 100% of the limited
partnership interests in Triangle SBIC in exchange for
approximately 1.4 million shares of Triangles common
stock, having an aggregate value of $21,250,000 based on the IPO
price. Triangle SBIC became our wholly owned subsidiary,
retained its SBIC license, continues to hold its existing
investments and will make new investments with the proceeds from
our IPO.
|
|
|
|
Triangle Capital Corporation acquired 100% of the equity
interests in TML, the general partner of Triangle SBIC, in
exchange for 500,000 shares of Triangles common
stock, having an aggregate value of $7,500,000 based on the IPO
price.
|
The IPO consisted of the sale of 4,770,000 shares of our
common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, resulting in net
proceeds to us of approximately $64.7 million after
deducting offering costs. Triangle contributed approximately
$44.0 million of the net proceeds of the IPO (after the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option) to
Triangle SBIC, and Triangle SBIC has made and will continue to
make new investments with the net proceeds of the IPO and
proceeds from SBA guaranteed debentures issued from time to time
by Triangle SBIC.
31
The following diagram depicts our ownership structure
immediately after the IPO and consummation of the formation
transactions:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on 6,686,760 shares of common stock outstanding
immediately after the IPO and consummation of the Formation
Transactions. |
BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANY
ELECTIONS
As a result of the IPO and the formation transactions described
above, we and Triangle SBIC are closed-end, non-diversified
management investment companies that have elected to be treated
as BDCs under the 1940 Act. In addition, we have elected to be
treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Our election to
be regulated as a BDC and our election to be treated as a RIC
will have a significant impact on our future operations. Some of
the most important effects on our future operations of our
election to be regulated as a BDC and our election to be treated
as a RIC are outlined below.
We
report our investments at market value or fair value with
changes in value reported through our statement of
operations.
We report all of our investments, including debt investments, at
market value or, for investments that do not have a readily
available market value, at their fair value as
determined in good faith by our board of directors. Changes in
these values will be reported through our statement of
operations under the caption of net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) of investments. See
Business Valuation Process and Determination
of Net Asset Value.
We
intend to distribute substantially all of our income to our
stockholders. We generally will be required to pay income taxes
only on the portion of our taxable income we do not distribute
to stockholders (actually or constructively).
We have elected to be treated as a RIC. As a RIC, we intend to
distribute to our stockholders substantially all of our net
taxable income and the excess of realized net short-term capital
gains over realized net long-term capital losses. In addition,
we may retain certain net long-term capital gains and elect to
treat such net capital gains as deemed distributed to our
stockholders. If this happens, you will be treated as if you
received an actual distribution of the capital gains and
reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in us. You also may be
eligible to claim a tax credit against your federal income tax
liability (or, in certain circumstances, a tax refund) equal to
your allocable share of the tax we pay on the deemed
distribution. See Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations.
32
Provided we continue to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, we
generally are required to pay U.S. federal income taxes
only on the portion of our net taxable income and gains that we
do not distribute (actually or constructively). We may in the
future form direct or indirect wholly-owned taxable
subsidiaries. Some of the wholly-owned subsidiaries may be
treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, and as a result, such subsidiaries will be subject to
tax at regular corporate rates. Although, as a RIC, dividends
and distributions of capital received by us from any taxable
subsidiary and distributed to our stockholders would not be
subject to federal income taxes, the taxable subsidiary would
generally be subject to federal and state income taxes on its
income. As a result, the net return to us on such investments
held by such subsidiaries would be reduced to the extent that
the subsidiaries are subject to income taxes.
Our
ability to use leverage as a means of financing our portfolio of
investments will be limited.
As a BDC, we are required to meet a coverage ratio of total
assets to total senior securities of at least 200.0%. For this
purpose, senior securities include all borrowings and any
preferred stock we may issue in the future. Additionally, our
ability to continue to utilize leverage as a means of financing
our portfolio of investments is limited by this asset coverage
test.
We are
required to comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act
applicable to business development companies.
As a BDC, we are required to have a majority of directors who
are not interested persons under the 1940 Act. In
addition, we are required to comply with other applicable
provisions of the 1940 Act, including those requiring the
adoption of a code of ethics, fidelity bond and custody
arrangements. See also Regulation.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise specified in any prospectus supplement
accompanying this prospectus, we intend to use the net proceeds
from the sale of our common stock for investment and general
corporate purposes. We intend to invest the net proceeds in
lower middle market companies in accordance with our investment
objective and strategies and for working capital and general
corporate purposes. We plan to raise new equity when we have
attractive investment opportunities available. Pending such use,
we will invest the net proceeds of any offering primarily in
short-term securities consistent with our BDC election and our
election to be taxed as a RIC. See Regulation
Temporary Investments.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited
to the extent that the net proceeds from an offering, pending
full investment, are held in interest-bearing deposits or other
short-term instruments. The supplement to this prospectus
relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of
proceeds from such an offering.
33
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol TCAP. The following table sets forth, for
each fiscal quarter since our initial public offering, the range
of high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on
the Nasdaq Global Market, the sales price as a percentage of our
net asset value (NAV) and the dividends declared by us for each
fiscal quarter. The stock quotations are inter-dealer quotations
and do not include
mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions and as such do not necessarily
represent actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium/Discount
|
|
|
Premium/Discount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
of High Sales
|
|
|
of Low Sales Price
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Price to NAV(2)
|
|
|
to NAV(2)
|
|
|
per Share(3)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 15, 2007 to March 31, 2007(4)
|
|
$
|
13.57
|
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
|
|
118
|
%
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
$
|
15.79
|
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
|
|
115
|
%
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.99
|
|
|
$
|
14.99
|
|
|
$
|
11.95
|
|
|
|
107
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.50
|
|
|
$
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
106
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.85
|
|
|
$
|
13.40
|
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.73
|
|
|
$
|
12.25
|
|
|
$
|
10.81
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.76
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices.
The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at
the end of each period. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by
net asset value. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the dividend declared in the specified quarter. We
have adopted an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Our stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on
February 15, 2007. |
The last reported price for our common stock on April 9,
2009 was $10.40 per share. As of April 9, 2009, we had 76
stockholders of record.
Shares of BDCs may trade at a market price that is less than the
value of the net assets attributable to those shares. The
possibilities that our shares of common stock will trade at a
discount from net asset value or at premiums that are
unsustainable over the long term are separate and distinct from
the risk that our net asset value will decrease. It is not
possible to predict whether the common stock offered hereby will
trade at, above, or below net asset value. Since our IPO in
February 2007, our shares of common stock have traded for
amounts both less than and exceeding our net asset value.
We intend to distribute quarterly dividends to our stockholders.
Our quarterly dividends, if any, are determined by our board of
directors. We have elected to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter
M of the Code. As long as we qualify as a RIC, we will not be
taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net
capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains
are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to stockholders on
a timely basis.
To obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other
things, distribute at least 90.0% of our net ordinary income and
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses, if any. In order to avoid certain
excise taxes imposed on RICs, we currently intend to distribute
during each
34
calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of
(1) 98.0% of our net ordinary income for the calendar year,
(2) 98.0% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses
for the calendar year and (3) any net ordinary income and
net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed
during such years. We may retain for investment some or all of
our net capital gains (i.e., realized net long-term capital
gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) and
treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders.
If we do this, you will be treated as if you received an actual
distribution of the capital gains we retain and then reinvested
the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. You also may be
eligible to claim a tax credit (or, in certain circumstances, a
tax refund) equal to your allocable share of the tax we paid on
the capital gains deemed distributed to you. Please refer to
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
for further information regarding the consequences of our
retention of net capital gains. We may, in the future, make
actual distributions to our stockholders of our net capital
gains. We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results
that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if
we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making
distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the
asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if
distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.
See Regulation and Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Considerations.
35
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The selected historical financial and other data below reflects
the consolidated operations of Triangle Capital Corporation and
Triangle SBIC. The selected financial data at and for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
have been derived from our financial statements that have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm. Financial information prior
to our initial public offering in 2007 is that of Triangle SBIC,
which is Triangle Capital Corporations predecessor. You
should read this selected financial and other data in
conjunction with our Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the financial statements and notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income statement data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest, fee and dividend income
|
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
5,855
|
|
|
$
|
6,443
|
|
|
$
|
10,912
|
|
|
$
|
21,056
|
|
Interest income from cash and cash equivalent investments
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
|
|
21,359
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
4,228
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
|
|
6,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
non-control/non-affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
(1,393
|
)
|
Net realized gain on investments affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
|
|
(4,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
5,612
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
$
|
8,813
|
|
|
$
|
7,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per
share basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
19,415
|
|
|
$
|
36,617
|
|
|
$
|
54,247
|
|
|
$
|
113,037
|
|
|
$
|
182,105
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
21,788
|
|
|
|
27,193
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
3,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
23,185
|
|
|
$
|
43,819
|
|
|
$
|
58,944
|
|
|
$
|
136,210
|
|
|
$
|
213,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital/net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,609
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
Distribution/dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
SBA-guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
37,010
|
|
|
|
115,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,181
|
|
|
|
32,454
|
|
|
|
33,788
|
|
|
|
42,737
|
|
|
|
122,242
|
|
Total partners capital/shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
11,365
|
|
|
|
25,156
|
|
|
|
93,473
|
|
|
|
91,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital/net assets
|
|
$
|
23,185
|
|
|
$
|
43,819
|
|
|
$
|
58,944
|
|
|
$
|
136,210
|
|
|
$
|
213,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on investments
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Number of portfolio companies
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Expense ratios (annualized, as percentage of average net
assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Interest expense and deferred financing fees
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information in this section contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see
Risk Factors and Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements for a discussion of the
uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements. You should read the following discussion in
conjunction with the combined financial statements and related
notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus.
The following discussion is designed to provide a better
understanding of our consolidated financial statements,
including a brief discussion of our business, key factors that
impacted our performance and a summary of our operating results.
As discussed further in Note 1 to our unaudited financial
statements, on February 21, 2007, concurrent with the
closing of our initial public offering (the IPO), we
acquired Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP (Triangle
SBIC) and Triangle SBICs General Partner, Triangle
Mezzanine LLC (TML) in exchange for shares of our
common stock. These acquisitions constituted an exchange of
shares between entities under common control. In accordance with
the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under
common control contained in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, the financial
data and information discussed herein for the year ended
December 31, 2007 are presented as if the acquisition had
occurred as of January 1, 2007.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the notes thereto included herein.
Historical results and percentage relationships among any
amounts in the financial statements are not necessarily
indicative of trends in operating results for any future periods.
Overview
of our Business
We are a Maryland corporation incorporated on October 10,
2006, for the purposes of acquiring Triangle SBIC and TML,
raising capital in the IPO and thereafter operating as an
internally managed business development company, or BDC, under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, or 1940 Act. Triangle SBIC
is licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, by
the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, and has
also elected to be treated as a BDC. Triangle SBIC has invested
primarily in debt instruments, equity investments, warrants and
other securities of lower middle market privately held companies
located in the United States. Upon the consummation of the IPO,
we completed the Formation Transactions described herein this
prospectus, at which time Triangle SBIC became our wholly-owned
subsidiary, and the former partners of Triangle SBIC became our
stockholders.
Our business is to provide capital to lower middle market
companies in the United States. We define lower middle market
companies as those with annual revenues between $10.0 and
$100.0 million. We focus on investments in companies with a
history of generating revenues and positive cash flows, an
established market position and a proven management team with a
strong operating discipline. Our target portfolio company has
annual revenues between $20.0 and $75.0 million and annual
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
or EBITDA, between $2.0 and $20.0 million.
We invest primarily in senior and subordinated debt securities
secured by first and second lien security interests in portfolio
company assets, coupled with equity interests. Our investments
generally range from $5.0 to $15.0 million per portfolio
company. In certain situations, we have partnered with other
funds to provide larger financing commitments.
We generate revenues in the form of interest income, primarily
from our investments in debt securities, loan origination and
other fees and dividend income. Fees generated in connection
with our debt investments are recognized over the life of the
loan using the effective interest method or, in some cases,
recognized as earned. In addition, we generate revenue in the
form of capital gains, if any, on warrants or other
equity-related securities that we acquire from our portfolio
companies. Our debt investments generally have a term of between
three and seven years and typically bear interest at fixed rates
between 11.0% and 16.0% per annum. Certain of our debt
investments have a form of interest, referred to as
payment-in-kind
interest, or PIK, that is not paid currently but that is accrued
and added to the loan balance and paid at the end of the term.
In our
38
negotiations with potential portfolio companies, we generally
seek to minimize PIK interest. Cash interest on our debt
investments is generally payable monthly; however, some of our
debt investments pay cash interest on a quarterly basis. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average yield on
all of our outstanding debt investments (including PIK interest)
was approximately 14.4% and 13.9%, respectively. The weighted
average yield on all of our outstanding investments (including
equity and equity-linked investments) was approximately 13.2%
and 12.6% as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Triangle SBIC is eligible to sell debentures guaranteed by the
SBA to the capital markets at favorable interest rates and
invest these funds in portfolio companies. We intend to continue
to operate Triangle SBIC as an SBIC and to utilize the proceeds
of the sale of SBA guaranteed debentures, referred to herein as
SBA leverage, to make additional investments and thus enhance
returns to our stockholders.
Portfolio
Composition
The total value of our investment portfolio was
$182.1 million as of December 31, 2008, as compared to
$113.0 million as of December 31, 2007 and
$54.2 million as of December 31, 2006. As of
December 31, 2008, we had investments in 34 portfolio
companies with an aggregate cost of $180.2 million. As of
December 31, 2007, we had investments in 26 portfolio
companies with an aggregate cost of $105.9 million. As of
December 31, 2006, we had investments in 19 portfolio
companies with an aggregate cost of $51.9 million. As of
December 31, 2008, none of our portfolio investments
represented greater than 10% of the total fair value of our
investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2007, we had one
portfolio investment that represented greater than 10% of the
total fair value of our investment portfolio. As of
December 31, 2006, none of our portfolio investments
represented greater than 10% of the total fair value of our
investment portfolio.
As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, our investment
portfolio consisted of the following investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt and
2nd lien
notes(1)
|
|
$
|
147,493,871
|
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
$
|
143,015,291
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
Senior debt(1)
|
|
|
16,269,628
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16,269,628
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Equity shares
|
|
|
13,684,269
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
17,301,372
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
1,829,370
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4,644,600
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,151,538
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt and
2nd lien
notes(1)
|
|
$
|
80,902,982
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
$
|
80,902,982
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Senior debt(1)
|
|
|
14,728,958
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14,728,958
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Equity shares
|
|
|
9,699,689
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15,335,900
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
548,172
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,870,500
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,879,801
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt and
2nd lien
notes(1)
|
|
$
|
48,038,892
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
$
|
46,574,669
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
Equity shares
|
|
|
2,714,833
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5,633,283
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
1,158,411
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,789,260
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,912,136
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,247,212
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have changed our balance sheet presentation for all periods
to net deferred loan origination revenue against the associated
debt investments for all periods as a result of the adoption of
SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. |
39
Investment
Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we made twelve new
investments totaling $91.0 million, additional debt
investments in an existing portfolio company of
$1.9 million and four additional equity investments in
existing portfolio companies of approximately $0.2 million.
We also sold three investments in portfolio companies for
approximately $3.6 million, resulting in realized gains
totaling $2.9 million and recognized a realized loss on the
writeoff of one investment totaling $1.5 million. We had
four portfolio company loans repaid at par in the amount of
$12.5 million. In addition, we received normal principal
repayments, partial loan prepayments and payment in kind (PIK)
interest repayments totaling approximately $6.9 million in
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Total portfolio investment activity for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
New investments
|
|
|
93,054,022
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
(3,631,876
|
)
|
Loan origination fees received
|
|
|
(1,686,996
|
)
|
Principal repayments received
|
|
|
(17,336,521
|
)
|
Payment in kind interest earned
|
|
|
3,761,786
|
|
Payment in kind interest payments received
|
|
|
(1,978,498
|
)
|
Accretion of loan discounts
|
|
|
169,548
|
|
Accretion of deferred loan origination revenue
|
|
|
484,664
|
|
Realized gains on investments
|
|
|
1,435,608
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
(5,202,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on debt investments as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on total investments as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we made nine new
investments totaling $62.2 million, one additional debt
investment in an existing portfolio company of $1.9 million
and one additional equity investment in an existing portfolio
company of approximately $0.1 million. In 2007, we sold one
investment in a portfolio company for approximately
$1.3 million, resulting in a realized loss of approximately
$1.4 million. We also received principal prepayments from
two portfolio companies totaling $3.2 million, which
resulted in a realized gain of approximately $0.1 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we sold an equity investment in a
portfolio company for total proceeds of $0.9 million,
resulting in a realized gain of approximately $0.6 million
and we received a principal prepayment from this portfolio
company of $4.2 million, which resulted in a realized gain
of approximately $0.1 million. In addition, we received
normal principal repayments and PIK interest payments totaling
approximately $1.0 million in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
40
Total portfolio investment activity for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007(1)
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
54,247,212
|
|
New investments
|
|
|
64,159,172
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
(2,227,124
|
)
|
Loan origination fees received
|
|
|
(875,905
|
)
|
Principal repayments and payment in kind interest payments
received
|
|
|
(8,483,843
|
)
|
Payment in kind interest earned
|
|
|
1,521,114
|
|
Accretion/writeoff of loan discounts
|
|
|
205,725
|
|
Accretion of deferred loan origination revenue
|
|
|
287,143
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(618,620
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
4,821,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on debt investments as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on total investments as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have changed our balance sheet presentation for all periods
to net deferred loan origination revenue against the associated
debt investments for all periods subsequent to the adoption of
SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. |
Non-Accrual
Assets
As of December 31, 2008, the fair value of our non-accrual
assets comprised 1.6% of the total fair value of our portfolio,
the cost of our non-accrual assets comprised 3.2% of the total
cost of our portfolio. Our
non-accrual
assets as of December 31, 2008 are the following:
Gerli and
Company
In the third quarter of 2008, we recognized an unrealized loss
of $0.3 million on our subordinated note investment in
Gerli and Company (Gerli), which has a cost of
approximately $3.1 million. This unrealized loss reduced
the fair value of our investment in Gerli to $2.8 million
as of September 30, 2008. During the third quarter of 2008,
we continued to receive interest payments in accordance with our
loan agreement. In November 2008, we placed our investment in
Gerli on non-accrual status. As a result, under generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we no longer
recognize interest income on our investment in Gerli.
Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized an
additional unrealized loss on our investment in Gerli of
$0.9 million. As of December 31, 2008, the fair value
of our investment in Gerli is $1.9 million.
Fire
Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
In the second quarter of 2008, we recognized an unrealized loss
of $0.3 million on our subordinated note investment in
another of our portfolio companies, Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
(Fire Sprinkler Systems). This unrealized loss
reduced the fair value of our investment in Fire Sprinkler
Systems to $2.1 million as of June 30, 2008. In the
third quarter of 2008, based on the continued underperformance
of Fire Sprinkler Systems, we recognized an additional
unrealized loss on our investment of $0.7 million. As of
September 30, 2008, the fair value of our investment in
Fire Sprinkler Systems was $1.4 million. During both the
second and third quarters of 2008, we continued to receive
interest and principal payments in accordance with our loan
agreement. In October 2008, we placed our investment in Fire
Sprinkler Systems on non-accrual status. As a result, under
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we
no longer recognize interest income on our investment in Fire
Sprinkler Systems. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized
an additional unrealized loss on our investment in Fire
Sprinkler Systems of $0.4 million. As of December 31,
2008, the fair value of our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems
is $1.0 million.
41
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of year ended December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
Investment
Income
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total investment
income was $21.4 million, a 68% increase from
$12.7 million of total investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily attributable
to a $7.9 million increase in total loan interest, fee and
dividend income and a $2.2 million increase in total
paid-in-kind
interest income due to a net increase in our portfolio
investments from December 31, 2007 to December 31,
2008, partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in
interest income from cash and cash equivalent investments due to
(i) a significant decrease in average cash balances in 2008
over the comparable period in 2007 and (ii) a decrease in
overall interest rates. Non-recurring fee income was
$0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to $0.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2008, expenses increased by
70% to $10.7 million from $6.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The increase in expenses was
primarily attributable to a $2.4 million increase in
general and administrative expenses and a $2.2 million
increase in interest expense. As a result of the IPO and the
Formation Transactions described in Note 1 to our unaudited
financial statements, we are an internally managed investment
company and on February 21, 2007, we began incurring
general and administrative costs associated with employing our
executive officers, key investment personnel and corporate
professionals and other general corporate overhead costs. As of
December 31, 2008, we had 14 full-time employees, as
compared to 11 full-time employees as of December 31,
2007. In addition, we experienced an increase in general and
administrative costs in 2008 associated with being a
publicly-traded company, such as increased insurance,
accounting, corporate governance and legal costs. The increase
in interest expense is related to higher average balances of
SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding during the year ended
December 31, 2008 than in the comparable period in 2007.
These increases in general and administrative costs and interest
costs were partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in
management fees. We incurred no management fees in 2008 compared
to $0.2 million in management fees in 2007.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $8.6 million increase in total
investment income and the $4.4 million increase in
expenses, net investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $10.6 million compared to net
investment income of $6.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Net
Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total net realized
gains on investments totaled approximately $1.4 million.
Net realized gain on control investments for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $2.8 million, which consisted of
a realized gain on one investment. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, net realized loss on
non-control/non-affiliate investments was $1.4 million,
which consisted of a realized loss on the writeoff of one
investment of $1.5 million and a realized gain on one
investment of $0.1 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, we recognized a realized gain of
$0.1 million on an affiliate investment. In addition,
during the year ended December 31, 2007, net realized loss
on non-control/non-affiliate investments was $0.8 million
which related to a realized loss on one investment of
$1.4 million, offset by a realized gain on a second
investment of $0.6 million.
In the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded net
unrealized depreciation of investments, net of income taxes, in
the amount of $4.3 million, comprised partially of net
unrealized depreciation reclassification adjustments of
approximately $1.2 million related to the realized gain on
control investments and the realized losses on
non-control/non-affiliate investments noted above. In addition,
in the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded unrealized
appreciation, net of tax, on eleven other investments totaling
$5.6 million and
42
unrealized depreciation on 17 investments totaling
$8.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
we recorded net unrealized appreciation of investments, net of
income taxes, in the amount of $3.1 million, comprised
partially of net unrealized appreciation/depreciation
reclassification adjustments of approximately $1.1 million
related to the realized gain and loss noted above. In addition,
in the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded unrealized
appreciation, net of tax, on nine other investments totaling
$4.3 million and unrealized depreciation on 11 investments
totaling $2.3 million.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets from
operations during the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$7.6 million as compared to $8.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006
Investment
Income
For the year ended December 31, 2007, total investment
income was $12.7 million, an 89.4% increase from
$6.7 million of total investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily attributable
to a $4.5 million increase in total loan interest, fee,
dividend income and PIK interest due to a net increase in our
portfolio investments from December 31, 2006 to
December 31, 2007. Fee income, consisting primarily of loan
prepayment fees, debt amendment fees and certain management and
advisory fees was approximately $0.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared with $0.2 for the year
ended December 31, 2006. In addition, interest income from
cash and cash equivalent investments increased by
$1.5 million due to a significant increase in average cash
balances in 2007 over 2006 resulting from the receipt of
proceeds of $64.7 million from our Offering in February
2007.
Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2007, expenses increased by
73.5% to $6.3 million from $3.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The increase in expenses was
primarily attributable to a $3.8 million increase in
general and administrative expenses and an increase in interest
expense of approximately $0.2 million. As a result of the
Offering and the Formation Transactions described in Note 1
to our financial statements, we are now an internally managed
investment company and, on February 21, 2007, we began
incurring general and administrative costs associated with
employing our executive officers, key investment personnel and
corporate professionals and other general corporate overhead
costs. In addition, we experienced an increase in general and
administrative costs associated with being a publicly-traded
company, such as increased insurance, accounting, corporate
governance and legal costs. These increases in general and
administrative costs were partially offset by a
$1.4 million decrease in management fees. We incurred a
full year of management fees in 2006 and only incurred
management fees through February 21, 2007 in 2007.
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $6.0 million increase in total
investment income and the $2.7 million increase in
expenses, net investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $6.4 million compared to net
investment income of $3.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Net
Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2007, net realized loss on
non-control/non-affiliate investments was $0.8 million
which related to a realized loss on one investment of
$1.4 million, offset by a realized gain on a second
investment of $0.6 million. In addition, we recognized a
realized gain of $0.1 million on an affiliate investment
during the year ended December 31, 2007. This realized gain
resulted from the writeoff of original issue discount related to
the prepayment of the portfolio companys outstanding
subordinated note. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
we recorded net unrealized appreciation of investments, net of
income taxes, in the amount of $3.1 million, comprised
partially of net unrealized appreciation/depreciation
reclassification adjustments of approximately $1.1 million
related to the realized gain and loss noted above. In addition,
in the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded unrealized
appreciation, net of tax, on nine other investments totaling
$4.3 million and unrealized depreciation on 11 investments
totaling $2.3 million.
43
For the year ended December 31, 2006, net realized gain on
non-control/non-affiliate investments was $6.0 million
which related to realized gains on two investments. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded net unrealized
depreciation of investments in the amount of $0.4 million,
consisting of (i) unrealized depreciation on three
investments totaling $1.6 million, (ii) an unrealized
depreciation reclassification adjustment of approximately
$0.7 million related to the realized gains noted above and
(iii) unrealized appreciation on ten investments totaling
$1.9 million.
In the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized an
income tax provision related to an investment held in one of our
Taxable Subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 1 to our
Financial Statements under Income Taxes.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets from
operations during the year ended December 31, 2007 was
$8.8 million as compared to $8.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents on hand,
our available SBA leverage and our anticipated cash flows from
operations will be adequate to meet our cash needs for our daily
operations for at least the next twelve months.
The Fund may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of
1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain
distributions to Triangle Capital Corporation that may be
necessary to enable Triangle Capital Corporation to make the
minimum required distributions to its stockholders and qualify
as a RIC.
Cash
Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we experienced a net
increase in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of
$5.4 million. During that period, our operating activities
used $60.6 million in cash, consisting primarily of new
portfolio investments of $93.1 million, partially offset by
repayments of loans received and proceeds from sales of
investments of $21.0 million. We generated
$66.1 million of cash from financing activities, consisting
of proceeds from borrowings under SBA guaranteed debentures
payable of $78.1 million, offset by financing fees paid of
$2.8 million and cash dividends paid of $9.2 million.
At December 31, 2008, we had $27.2 million of cash and
cash equivalents on hand.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we experienced a net
increase in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of
$19.2 million. During that period, our operating activities
used $47.8 million in cash, and we generated
$67.1 million of cash from financing activities, consisting
of (i) proceeds from our IPO of $64.7 million,
(ii) proceeds from the issuance of SBA guaranteed
debentures of $5.2 million and (iii) a decrease in
deferred offering costs of $1.0 million, partially offset
by cash dividends paid of $3.0 million, tax distributions
to partners of $0.7 million and financing fees paid to the
SBA of $0.1 million. At December 31, 2007, we had
$21.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we experienced a net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of
$3.5 million. During that period, we used $8.1 million
in cash to fund operating activities and we generated
$4.6 million of cash from financing activities, consisting
of limited partner capital contributions in the amount of
$10.6 million offset by a cash distribution to limited
partners in the amount of $5.0 million and an increase in
deferred offering costs of $1.0 million. We invested the
entire $10.6 million of cash from the limited partner
capital contributions in new subordinated debt investments
during 2006. As of December 31, 2006, all limited partners
in the Fund had fully funded their committed capital. At
December 31, 2006, we had $2.5 million of cash on hand.
Financing
Transactions
Due to Triangle SBICs status as a licensed SBIC, Triangle
SBIC has the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA
at favorable interest rates. Under the Small Business Investment
Act and the SBA rules applicable to SBICs, an SBIC (or group of
SBICs under common control) can have outstanding at any
44
time debentures guaranteed by the SBA in an amount up to twice
the amount of its regulatory capital, which generally is the
amount raised from private investors. The maximum statutory
limit on the dollar amount of outstanding debentures guaranteed
by the SBA issued by a single SBIC is currently
$150.0 million (which amount is subject to an annual
inflation adjustment). Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a
maturity of ten years, with interest payable semi-annually. The
principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid
before maturity but may be pre-paid at any time. Debentures
issued prior to September 2006 were subject to pre-payment
penalties during their first five years. Those pre-payment
penalties no longer apply to debentures issued after
September 1, 2006.
With $65.3 million of regulatory capital as of
December 31, 2008, the Fund has the current capacity to
issue up to a total of $130.6 million of SBA guaranteed
debentures, subject to the payment of a 1% commitment fee to the
SBA on the amount of the commitment. As of December 31,
2008, the Fund has $115.1 million of SBA guaranteed
debentures outstanding. In addition to the one time
1.0% fee on the total commitment from the SBA, the Company also
pays a one time 2.425% fee on the amount of each
debenture issued. These fees are capitalized as deferred
financing costs and are amortized over the term of the debt
agreements using the effective interest method. The weighted
average interest rate for all SBA guaranteed debentures as of
December 31, 2008 was 5.81%, which includes
$93.1 million of pooled SBA-guaranteed debentures with a
weighted average fixed interest rate of 6.19% and
$22.0 million of unpooled SBA-guaranteed debentures with a
weighted average interim interest rate of 4.19%.
Current
Market Conditions
During 2008, the debt and equity capital markets in the United
States have been severely impacted by significant write-offs in
the financial services sector relating to subprime mortgages and
the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated bank
loan market, among other things. These events, along with the
deterioration of the housing market, have led to an economic
recession in the U.S. and abroad, which could be long-term.
Banks and others in the financial services industry have
continued to report significant write-downs in the fair value of
their assets, which has led to the failure of a number of banks
and investment companies, a number of distressed mergers and
acquisitions, the government take-over of the nations two
largest government-sponsored mortgage companies, and the passage
of the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization of
2008 in early October 2008. These events have significantly
impacted the financial and credit markets and have reduced the
availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a
whole, and for financial firms in particular. While we have
capacity to issue additional SBA guaranteed debentures as
discussed above, we may not be able to access additional equity
capital, which could result in the slowing of our origination
activity during 2009 and beyond.
In the event that the United States economy remains in a
recession, it is possible that the results of some of the middle
market companies in which we invest could experience
deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in
meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults.
While we are not seeing signs of an overall, broad deterioration
in our portfolio company results at this time, there can be no
assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio
companies will not be negatively impacted by economic conditions
which could have a negative impact on our future results.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses for the periods covered by such financial
statements. We have identified investment valuation and revenue
recognition as our most critical accounting estimates. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to the matters described below. These estimates are
based on the information that is currently available to us and
on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
A discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
45
Investment
Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our
financial statements is the valuation of investments and the
related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of
investments recorded. We have established and documented
processes and methodologies for determining the fair values of
portfolio company investments on a recurring (quarterly) basis.
As discussed below, we have engaged an independent valuation
firm to assist us in our valuation process.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in
an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an
asset or transfer a liability in the market in which the
reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, that
is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date,
considered from the perspective of a market participant that
holds the asset or owes the liability. SFAS 157 provides a
consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price
and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In addition,
SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements
based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels
of valuation hierarchy established by SFAS 157 are defined
as follows:
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are
quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets.
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
A financial instruments categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. We invest
primarily in debt and equity of privately held companies for
which quoted prices falling within the categories of
Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are not available.
Therefore, we value all of our investments at fair value, as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors, using
Level 3 inputs, as further described below. Due to the
inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our Board of
Directors estimate of fair value may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market for
the securities existed, and the differences could be material.
In addition, changes in the market environment and other events
that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the
gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be
different than the valuations currently assigned.
Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded and for
which a limited market does not exist are valued at fair value
as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. There is
no single standard for determining fair value in good faith, as
fair value depends upon circumstances of each individual case.
In general, fair value is the amount that we might reasonably
expect to receive upon the current sale of the security.
We evaluate the investments in portfolio companies using the
most recent portfolio company financial statements and
forecasts. We also consult with the portfolio companys
senior management to obtain further updates on the portfolio
companys performance, including information such as
industry trends, new product development and other operational
issues. Additionally, we consider some or all of the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
financial standing of the issuer of the security;
|
|
|
|
comparison of the business and financial plan of the issuer with
actual results;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
the size of the security held as it relates to the liquidity of
the market for such security;
|
|
|
|
pending public offering of common stock by the issuer of the
security;
|
|
|
|
pending reorganization activity affecting the issuer, such as
merger or debt restructuring;
|
|
|
|
ability of the issuer to obtain needed financing;
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy affecting the issuer;
|
|
|
|
financial statements and reports from portfolio company senior
management and ownership;
|
|
|
|
the type of security, the securitys cost at the date of
purchase and any contractual restrictions on the disposition of
the security;
|
|
|
|
discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the
same class at the time of purchase;
|
|
|
|
special reports prepared by analysts;
|
|
|
|
information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the
security
and/or sales
to third parties of similar securities;
|
|
|
|
the issuers ability to make payments and the type of
collateral;
|
|
|
|
the current and forecasted earnings of the issuer;
|
|
|
|
statistical ratios compared to lending standards and to other
similar securities; and
|
|
|
|
other pertinent factors.
|
In making the good faith determination of the value of debt
securities, we start with the cost basis of the security, which
includes the amortized original issue discount, and PIK
interest, if any. We also use a risk rating system to estimate
the probability of default on the debt securities and the
probability of loss if there is a default. The risk rating
system covers both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the
business and the securities held. In valuing debt securities, we
utilize an income approach model that considers
factors including, but not limited to, (i) the portfolio
investments current risk rating (discussed below),
(ii) the portfolio companys current trailing twelve
months (TTM) results of operations as compared
to the portfolio companys TTM results of operations as of
the date the investment was made, (iii) the portfolio
companys current leverage as compared to its leverage as
of the date the investment was made, and (iv) current
pricing and credit metrics for similar proposed and executed
investment transactions. In valuing equity securities of private
companies, we consider valuation methodologies consistent with
industry practice, including (i) valuation using a
valuation model based on original transaction multiples and the
portfolio companys recent financial performance,
(ii) valuation of the securities based on recent sales in
comparable transactions, and (iii) a review of similar
companies that are publicly traded and the market multiple of
their equity securities.
Unrealized appreciation or depreciation on portfolio investments
are recorded as increases or decreases in investments on the
balance sheets and are separately reflected on the statements of
operations in determining net increase or decrease in net assets
resulting from operations.
Duff & Phelps, LLC (Duff &
Phelps), an independent valuation firm, provides third
party valuation consulting services to us, which consist of
certain limited procedures that we identified and requested
Duff & Phelps to perform (hereinafter referred to as
the procedures). We generally request
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on each
portfolio company at least once in every calendar year and for
new portfolio companies, at least once in the twelve-month
period subsequent to the initial investment. In certain
instances, we may determine that it is not cost-effective, and
as a result is not in our stockholders best interest, to
request Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on one
or more portfolio companies. Such instances include, but are not
limited to, situations where the fair value of our investment in
the portfolio company is determined to be insignificant relative
to our total investment portfolio.
47
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in six portfolio companies comprising approximately 35% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of March 31,
2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in five portfolio companies comprising approximately 18% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of June 30,
2008. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in eight portfolio companies comprising approximately 29% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of
September 30, 2008. For the quarter ended December 31,
2008, we asked Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures
on investments in eight portfolio companies comprising
approximately 34% of the total investments at fair value
(exclusive of the fair value of new investments made during the
quarter) as of December 31, 2008. Upon completion of the
procedures, Duff & Phelps concluded that the fair
value, as determined by the Board of Directors, of those
investments subjected to the procedures did not appear to be
unreasonable. Our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely
responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in
good faith.
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
and Dividend Income
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. Generally, when interest
and/or
principal payments on a loan become past due, or if we otherwise
do not expect the borrower to be able to service its debt and
other obligations, we will place the loan on non-accrual status
and will generally cease recognizing interest income on that
loan until all principal and interest has been brought current
through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest
income is deemed to be collectible. We write off any previously
accrued and uncollected interest when it is determined that
interest is no longer considered collectible. Dividend income is
recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Fee
Income
Loan origination, facility, commitment, consent and other
advance fees received by us on loan agreements or other
investments are recorded as deferred income and recognized as
income over the term of the loan.
Payment-in-Kind
Interest (PIK)
We currently hold, and we expect to hold in the future, some
loans in our portfolio that contain a PIK interest provision.
The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in
each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the
loan, rather than being paid to us in cash, and recorded as
interest income. To maintain our status as a RIC, this non-cash
source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of
dividends, even though we have not yet collected the cash. We
will stop accruing PIK interest and write off any accrued and
uncollected interest when it is determined that PIK interest is
no longer collectible.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
changes to previous practice resulting from the application of
SFAS 157 relate to the definition of fair value, the
methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures
about fair value measurements. The definition of fair value
retains the exchange price notion used in earlier definitions of
fair value. SFAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is
the price in an orderly transaction between market participants
to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in
which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or
liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market
for the asset or liability. The transaction to sell the asset or
transfer the liability is a hypothetical transaction at the
measurement date,
48
considered from the perspective of a market participant that
holds the asset or owes the liability. SFAS 157 provides a
consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price
and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In addition,
SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements
based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability as of the measurement date. Our adoption of
SFAS 157 resulted in additional unrealized depreciation of
approximately $0.2 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. See Note 1 to our financial statements
for a further discussion of the impact of the adoption of
SFAS 157 on our financial statements and for expanded
disclosures about our fair value measurements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current
and future earnings to interest rate volatility, variability of
spread relationships, the difference in re-pricing intervals
between our assets and liabilities and the effect that interest
rates may have on our cash flows. Changes in the general level
of interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is
the difference between the interest income earned on interest
earning assets and our interest expense incurred in connection
with our interest bearing debt and liabilities. Changes in
interest rates can also affect, among other things, our ability
to acquire and originate loans and securities and the value of
our investment portfolio.
Our investment income is affected by fluctuations in various
interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates. We regularly
measure exposure to interest rate risk and determine whether or
not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure
to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2008, we
were not a party to any hedging arrangements.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately 87.2%, or
$138.8 million of our debt portfolio investments bore
interest at fixed rates and approximately 12.8%, or
$20.5 million of our debt portfolio investments bore
interest at variable rates. A 100 basis point decrease in
the interest rates on our variable-rate debt investments would
decrease our investment income by approximately
$0.2 million on an annual basis. All of our pooled SBA
debentures bear interest at fixed rates.
Because we currently borrow, and plan to borrow in the future,
money to make investments, our net investment income is
dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we
borrow funds and the rate at which we invest the funds borrowed.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a significant change
in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect
on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest
rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our
net investment income if there is not a corresponding increase
in interest income generated by floating rate assets in our
investment portfolio.
Related
Party Transactions
Effective concurrently with the closing of the IPO, TML, the
general partner of Triangle SBIC, merged into a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Triangle Capital Corporation. A substantial
majority of the ownership interests of TML at that time were
owned by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Investment Officer and two of our Managing Directors. As a
result of such merger, these five individuals collectively
received shares of our common stock valued at approximately
$6.7 million.
Three members of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, collectively own approximately 67% of Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC. As of December 31, 2008, Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC does not own any shares of Triangle Capital
Corporations common stock. Prior to the closing of the
IPO, Triangle Capital Partners, LLC provided management and
advisory services to Triangle SBIC pursuant to a management
services agreement dated as of February 3, 2003. Under the
terms of this management services agreement, Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC received approximately $0.2 million in
management fees from
49
Triangle SBIC during the year ended December 31, 2007.
This agreement terminated upon the closing of the IPO.
Contractual
Obligations
As of December 31, 2008, our future fixed commitments for
cash payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 to
|
|
|
2012 to
|
|
|
2014 and
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
SBA guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
$
|
115,110,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,110,000
|
|
Interest due on SBA guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
50,901,420
|
|
|
|
5,933,709
|
|
|
|
11,534,358
|
|
|
|
11,550,158
|
|
|
|
21,883,195
|
|
Unused commitments to extend credit(1)
|
|
|
271,746
|
|
|
|
271,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments(2)
|
|
|
1,440,236
|
|
|
|
275,124
|
|
|
|
569,214
|
|
|
|
595,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
167,723,402
|
|
|
$
|
6,480,579
|
|
|
$
|
12,103,572
|
|
|
$
|
12,146,057
|
|
|
$
|
136,993,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have a commitment to extend credit, in the form of loans, to
one of our portfolio companies which is undrawn as of
December 31, 2008. Since this commitment may expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not
necessarily represent future cash requirements, however we have
chosen to present the amount of this unused commitment as an
obligation in this table. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We lease our corporate office facility under an operating lease
that terminates on December 31, 2013. We believe that our
existing facilities will be adequate to meet our needs at least
through 2009, and that we will be able to obtain additional
space when, where and as needed on acceptable terms. |
Recent
Developments
In February 2009, we invested an additional
$3.8 million subordinated debt of Inland Pipe
Rehabilitation (Inland Pipe), a provider of
maintenance, inspection and repair services for piping, sewers,
drains and storm lines. Under the terms of the investment,
Inland Pipe will pay interest on the subordinated debt at a
fixed rate of 18% per annum.
In March 2009, we invested $5.2 million in Tulsa Inspection
Resources, Inc. (TIR), consisting of $5.0 million in
subordinated debt with warrants and $0.2 million in equity. TIR
is a leading independent provider of pipeline inspection
services for the oil and gas industry. Under the terms of the
investment, TIR will pay interest on the subordinated debt at a
fixed rate of 14% per annum.
50
SENIOR
SECURITIES
Information about our senior securities is shown in the
following table as of December 31, 2008 and for the years
indicated in the table, unless otherwise noted.
Ernst &Young LLPs report on the senior
securities table as of December 31, 2008 is attached as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive of
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liquidating
|
|
|
Average Market
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Coverage per
|
|
|
Preference per
|
|
|
Value per
|
|
Class and Year
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Unit(b)
|
|
|
Unit(c)
|
|
|
Unit(d)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2004
|
|
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2005
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2006
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2007
|
|
|
37,010
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2008
|
|
|
115,110
|
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at
the end of the period presented. |
|
(b) |
|
Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of
our total consolidated assets, less all liabilities and
indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to the
aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness.
Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts
per $1,000 of indebtedness. |
|
(c) |
|
The amount to which such class of senior security would be
entitled upon the involuntary liquidation of the issuer in
preference to any security junior to it. The
indicates information which the Securities and Exchange
Commission expressly does not require to be disclosed for
certain types of senior securities. |
|
(d) |
|
Not applicable because senior securities are not registered for
public trading. |
51
BUSINESS
Triangle Capital Corporation is a specialty finance company that
provides customized financing solutions to lower middle market
companies located throughout the United States. We define lower
middle market companies as those having annual revenues between
$10.0 and $100.0 million. Our investment objective is to
seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments. Our investment philosophy is to partner
with business owners, management teams and financial sponsors to
provide flexible financing solutions to fund growth, changes of
control, or other corporate events. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt securities secured by first and
second lien security interests in portfolio company assets,
coupled with equity interests.
We focus on investments in companies with a history of
generating revenues and positive cash flows, an established
market position and a proven management team with a strong
operating discipline. Our target portfolio company has annual
revenues between $20.0 and $75.0 million and EBITDA between
$2.0 and $20.0 million. We believe that these companies
have less access to capital and that the market for such capital
is underserved relative to larger companies. Companies of this
size are generally privately held and are less well known to
traditional capital sources such as commercial and investment
banks.
Our investments generally range from $5.0 to $15.0 million
per portfolio company. In certain situations, we have partnered
with other funds to provide larger financing commitments. We are
continuing to operate Triangle SBIC as an SBIC and to utilize
the proceeds of the sale of SBA guaranteed debentures, referred
to herein as SBA leverage, to enhance returns to our
stockholders. As of December 31, 2008, we had investments
in 34 portfolio companies, with an aggregate cost of
$180.2 million.
Our
Business Strategy
We seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments by:
|
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Underserved Markets. We believe
that broad-based consolidation in the financial services
industry coupled with operating margin and growth pressures have
caused financial institutions to de-emphasize services to lower
middle market companies in favor of larger corporate clients and
capital market transactions. We believe these dynamics have
resulted in the financing market for lower middle market
companies to be underserved, providing us with greater
investment opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Providing Customized Financing Solutions. We
offer a variety of financing structures and have the flexibility
to structure our investments to meet the needs of our portfolio
companies. Typically we invest in senior and subordinated debt
securities, coupled with equity interests. We believe our
ability to customize financing arrangements makes us an
attractive partner to lower middle market companies.
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Experience of Our Management
Team. Our senior management team has more than
100 years of combined experience advising, investing in,
lending to and operating companies across changing market
cycles. The members of our management team have diverse
investment backgrounds, with prior experience at investment
banks, specialty finance companies, commercial banks, and
privately and publicly held companies in the capacity of
executive officers. We believe this diverse experience provides
us with an in depth understanding of the strategic, financial
and operational challenges and opportunities of lower middle
market companies. We believe this understanding allows us to
select and structure better investments and to efficiently
monitor and provide managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies.
|
|
|
|
Applying Rigorous Underwriting Policies and Active Portfolio
Management. Our senior management team has
implemented rigorous underwriting policies that are followed in
each transaction. These policies include a thorough analysis of
each potential portfolio companys competitive position,
financial performance, management team operating discipline,
growth potential and industry attractiveness, allowing us to
better assess the companys prospects. After investing in a
company, we monitor the investment closely, typically receiving
monthly, quarterly and annual financial statements. We analyze
and discuss in detail the companys financial performance
with management in addition to
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
attending regular board of directors meetings. We believe that
our initial and ongoing portfolio review process allows us to
monitor effectively the performance and prospects of our
portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taking Advantage of Low Cost Debentures Guaranteed by the
SBA. Our license to do business as an SBIC allows
us to issue fixed-rate, low interest debentures which are
guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the capital markets,
potentially allowing us to increase our net interest income
beyond the levels achievable by other BDCs utilizing traditional
leverage.
|
|
|
|
Investing Across Multiple Industries. While we
focus our investments in lower middle market companies, we seek
to invest across various industries. We monitor our investment
portfolio to ensure we have acceptable industry balance, using
industry and market metrics as key indicators. By monitoring our
investment portfolio for industry balance we seek to reduce the
effects of economic downturns associated with any particular
industry or market sector. However, we may from time to time
hold securities of a single portfolio company that comprise more
than 5.0% of our total assets
and/or more
than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio
company. For that reason, we are classified as a non-diversified
management investment company under the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
Utilizing Long-Standing Relationships to Source
Deals. Our senior management team maintains
extensive relationships with entrepreneurs, financial sponsors,
attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, commercial bankers
and other non-bank providers of capital who refer prospective
portfolio companies to us. These relationships historically have
generated significant investment opportunities. We believe that
our network of relationships will continue to produce attractive
investment opportunities.
|
Our
Investment Criteria
We utilize the following criteria and guidelines in evaluating
investment opportunities. However, not all of these criteria and
guidelines have been, or will be, met in connection with each of
our investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Established Companies With Positive Cash
Flow. We seek to invest in established companies
with a history of generating revenues and positive cash flows.
We typically focus on companies with a history of profitability
and minimum trailing twelve month EBITDA of $2.0 million.
We do not invest in
start-up
companies, distressed situations, turn-around
situations or companies that we believe have unproven business
plans.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Teams With Meaningful Equity
Ownership. Based on our prior investment
experience, we believe that a management team with significant
experience with a portfolio company or relevant industry
experience and meaningful equity ownership is more committed to
a portfolio company. We believe management teams with these
attributes are more likely to manage the companies in a manner
that protects our debt investment and enhances the value of our
equity investment.
|
|
|
|
Strong Competitive Position. We seek to invest
in companies that have developed strong positions within their
respective markets, are well positioned to capitalize on growth
opportunities and compete in industries with barriers to entry.
We also seek to invest in companies that exhibit a competitive
advantage, which may help to protect their market position and
profitability.
|
|
|
|
Varied Customer and Supplier Base. We prefer
to invest in companies that have a varied customer and supplier
base. Companies with a varied customer and supplier base are
generally better able to endure economic downturns, industry
consolidation and shifting customer preferences.
|
|
|
|
Significant Invested Capital. We believe the
existence of significant underlying equity value provides
important support to investments. We will look for portfolio
companies that we believe have sufficient value beyond the layer
of the capital structure in which we invest.
|
53
Investments
Debt
Investments
We tailor the terms of our debt investments to the facts and
circumstances of each transaction and prospective portfolio
company, negotiating a structure that seeks to protect our
rights and manage our risk while creating incentives for the
portfolio company to achieve its business plan. To that end, we
typically seek board observation rights with each of our
portfolio companies and offer managerial assistance. We also
seek to limit the downside risks of our investments by
negotiating covenants that are designed to protect our
investments while affording our portfolio companies as much
flexibility in managing their businesses as possible. Such
restrictions may include affirmative and negative covenants,
default penalties, lien protection, change of control provisions
and put rights. We typically add a prepayment penalty structure
to enhance our total return on our investments.
We typically invest in senior secured debt and subordinated
notes. Senior subordinated notes are junior to senior secured
debt but senior to other series of subordinated notes. Our
senior secured debt investments and subordinated note
investments generally have terms of three to seven years. Our
senior secured debt investments generally provide for variable
interest at rates ranging from LIBOR plus 350 basis points
to LIBOR plus 950 basis points and our subordinated debt
investments generally provide for fixed interest rates between
12.0% and 19.0% per annum. Our subordinated note investments
generally are secured by a second priority security interest in
the assets of the borrower and generally include an equity
component, such as warrants to purchase common stock in the
portfolio company. In addition, certain loan investments may
have a form of interest that is not paid currently but is
accrued and added to the loan balance and paid at the end of the
term, referred to as
payment-in-kind,
or PIK interest. In our negotiations with potential portfolio
companies, we generally seek to minimize PIK interest as we have
to pay out such accrued interest as dividends to our
stockholders, and we may have to borrow money or raise
additional capital in order to meet the requirement of having to
pay out at least 90.0% of our income to continue to qualify as a
Regulated Investment Company, or RIC, for federal tax purposes.
At December 31, 2008, the weighted average yield on all of
our outstanding debt investments was approximately 14.4%.
Equity
Investments
When we provide financing, we may acquire equity interests in
the portfolio company. We generally seek to structure our equity
investments as non-control investments to provide us with
minority rights and event-driven or time-driven puts. We also
seek to obtain registration rights in connection with these
investments, which may include demand and piggyback
registration rights, board seats and board observation rights.
Our investments have in the past and may in the future contain a
synthetic equity position pursuant to a formula typically
setting forth royalty rights we may exercise in accordance with
such formula.
Investment
Process
Our investment committee is responsible for all aspects of our
investment process. The members of our investment committee are
Messrs. Garland S. Tucker III, Brent P.W. Burgess, Steven
C. Lilly, Tarlton H. Long and David F. Parker. Our investment
committee meets once a week but also meets on an as needed basis
depending on transaction volume. Our investment committee has
organized our investment process into five distinct stages:
|
|
|
|
|
Origination
|
|
|
|
Due Diligence and Underwriting
|
|
|
|
Approval
|
|
|
|
Documentation and Closing
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Management and Investment Monitoring
|
54
Our investment process is summarized in the following chart:
Origination
The origination process for our investments includes sourcing,
screening, preliminary due diligence, transaction structuring,
and negotiation. Our origination process ultimately leads to the
issuance of a non-binding term sheet. Investment origination is
conducted by our eight investment professionals who are
responsible for sourcing potential investment opportunities. Our
investment professionals utilize their extensive relationships
with various financial sponsors, entrepreneurs, attorneys,
accountants, investment bankers and other non-bank providers of
capital to source transactions with prospective portfolio
companies.
If a transaction meets our investment criteria, we perform
preliminary due diligence, taking into consideration some or all
of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A comprehensive financial model that we prepare based on
quantitative analysis of historical financial performance,
financial projections and pro forma financial ratios assuming
investment;
|
|
|
|
Competitive landscape surrounding the potential investment;
|
|
|
|
Strengths and weaknesses of the potential investments
business strategy and industry;
|
|
|
|
Results of a broad qualitative analysis of the companys
products or services, market position, market dynamics and
customers and suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
Potential investment structures, certain financing ratios and
investment pricing terms.
|
If the results of our preliminary due diligence are
satisfactory, the origination team prepares a Summary
Transaction Memorandum which is presented to our investment
committee. If our investment committee recommends moving
forward, we issue a non-binding term sheet to the potential
portfolio company. Upon execution of a term sheet, we begin our
formal due diligence and underwriting process as we move toward
investment approval.
55
Due
Diligence and Underwriting
Our due diligence on a prospective investment is completed by a
minimum of two investment professionals, which we define as the
underwriting team. The members of the underwriting
team work together to conduct due diligence and to understand
the relationships among the prospective portfolio companys
business plan, operations and financial performance through
various methods, including, among others,
on-site
visits with management, in-depth review of historical and
projected financial data, interviews with customers and
suppliers, management background checks, third-party accounting
reports and review of any material contracts.
In most circumstances, we utilize outside experts to review the
legal affairs, accounting systems and results, and, where
appropriate, we engage specialists to investigate issues like
environmental matters and general industry outlooks. During the
underwriting process, significant attention is given to
sensitivity analyses and how companies might be expected to
perform in a protracted downside operating
environment. In addition, we analyze key financing ratios and
other industry metrics, including total debt to EBITDA, EBITDA
to fixed charges, EBITDA to total interest expense, total debt
to total capitalization and total senior debt to total
capitalization.
Upon completion of a satisfactory due diligence review and as
part of our evaluation of a proposed investment, the
underwriting team prepares an Investment Memorandum for
presentation to our investment committee. The Investment
Memorandum includes information about the potential portfolio
company such as its history, business strategy, potential
strengths and risks involved, analysis of key customers and
suppliers, working capital analysis, third party consultant
findings, expected returns on investment structure, anticipated
sources of repayment and exit strategies, analysis of historical
financials, and potential capitalization and ownership.
Approval
The underwriting team for the proposed investment presents the
Investment Memorandum to our investment committee for
consideration and approval. After reviewing the Investment
Memorandum, members of the investment committee may request
additional due diligence or modify the proposed financing
structure or terms of the proposed investment. Before we proceed
with any investment, the investment committee must approve the
proposed investment. Upon receipt of transaction approval, the
involved investment professionals proceed to document and, upon
satisfaction of applicable closing conditions, fund the
investment.
Documentation
and Closing
The underwriting team is responsible for leading the negotiation
of all documentation related to investment closings. We also
rely on law firms with whom we have worked on multiple
transactions to help us complete the necessary documentation
associated with transaction closings. If a transaction changes
materially from what was originally approved by the investment
committee, the underwriting team requests a formal meeting of
the investment committee to communicate the contemplated
changes. The investment committee has the right to approve the
amended transaction structure, to suggest alternative structures
or not to approve the contemplated changes.
Portfolio
Management and Investment Monitoring
Our investment professionals generally employ several methods of
evaluating and monitoring the performance of our portfolio
companies, which, depending on the particular investment, may
include the following specific processes, procedures and reports:
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly and quarterly review of actual financial performance
versus the corresponding period of the prior year and financial
projections;
|
|
|
|
Monthly and quarterly monitoring of all financial and other
covenants;
|
|
|
|
Review of senior lender loan compliance certificates, where
applicable;
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly review of operating results, and general business
performance, including the preparation of a portfolio monitoring
report which is distributed to members of our investment
committee;
|
|
|
|
Periodic face-to-face meetings with management teams and
financial sponsors of portfolio companies;
|
|
|
|
Attendance at portfolio company board meetings through board
seats or observation rights; and
|
|
|
|
Application of our investment rating system to each investment.
|
In the event that our investment committee determines that an
investment is underperforming, or circumstances suggest that the
risk associated with a particular investment has significantly
increased, we undertake more aggressive monitoring of the
affected portfolio company. The frequency of our monitoring of
an investment is determined by a number of factors, including,
but not limited to, the trends in the financial performance of
the portfolio company, the investment structure and the type of
collateral securing our investment, if any.
Investment
Rating System
We monitor a wide variety of key credit statistics that provide
information regarding our portfolio companies to help us assess
credit quality and portfolio performance. We generally require
our portfolio companies to provide annual audits in addition to
monthly and quarterly unaudited financial statements. Using
these statements, we calculate and evaluate certain financing
ratios. For purposes of analyzing the financial performance of
our portfolio companies, we may make certain adjustments to
their financial statements to reflect the pro forma results of a
company consistent with a change of control transaction, to
reflect anticipated cost savings resulting from a merger or
restructuring, costs related to new product development,
compensation to previous owners, and other acquisition or
restructuring related items.
As part of our valuation procedures we risk rate all of our
investments in debt securities. Our investment rating system
uses a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the lowest probability of
default and principal loss. This system is used to estimate the
probability of default on our debt securities and the
probability of loss if there is a default. The system is also
used to assist us in estimating the fair value of equity related
securities. These types of systems are referred to as risk
rating systems and are used by banks and rating agencies. Our
risk rating system covers both qualitative and quantitative
aspects of the business and the securities we hold.
57
In connection with the monitoring of our portfolio companies,
each investment we hold is rated based upon the following
ten-level numeric investment rating system:
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Description
|
|
10
|
|
Investment is performing above original expectations and
possibly 30.0% or more above original projections provided by
the portfolio company. Investment has been positively influenced
by an unforeseen external event. Full return of principal and
interest is expected. Capital gain is expected.
|
9
|
|
Investment is performing above original expectations and
possibly 30.0% or more above original projections provided by
the portfolio company. Investment may have been or is soon to be
positively influenced by an unforeseen external event. Full
return of principal and interest is expected. Capital gain is
expected.
|
8
|
|
Investment is performing above original expectations and
possibly 21.0% to 30.0% above original projections provided by
the portfolio company. Full return of principal and interest is
expected. Capital gain is expected.
|
7
|
|
Investment is performing above original expectations and
possibly 11.0% to 21.0% above original projections provided by
the portfolio company. Full return of principal and interest is
expected. Depending on age of transaction, potential for capital
gain exists.
|
6
|
|
Investment is performing above original expectations and
possibly 5.0% to 11.0% above original projections provided by
the portfolio company. Full return of principal and interest is
expected. Depending on age of transaction, potential for capital
gain exists.
|
5
|
|
Investment is performing in line with expectations. Full return
of principal and interest is expected. Depending on age of
transaction, potential for nominal capital gain may be expected.
|
4
|
|
Investment is performing below expectations, but no covenant
defaults have occurred. Full return of principal and interest is
expected. Little to no capital gain is expected.
|
3
|
|
Investment is in default of transaction covenants but interest
payments are current. No loss of principal is expected.
|
2
|
|
Investment is in default of transaction covenants and interest
(and possibly principal) payments are not current. A principal
loss of between 1.0% and 33.0% is expected.
|
1
|
|
Investment is in default of transaction covenants and interest
(and possibly principal) payments are not current. A principal
loss of between 34.0% and 67.0% is expected.
|
0
|
|
Investment is in default and a principal loss of between 68.0%
and 100.0% is expected.
|
Valuation
Process and Determination of Net Asset Value
Valuation
Process
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our
financial statements is the valuation of investments and the
related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of
investments recorded. We have established and documented
processes and methodologies for determining the fair values of
portfolio company investments on a recurring (quarterly) basis.
As discussed below, we have engaged an independent valuation
firm to assist us in our valuation process.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in
an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an
asset or transfer a liability in the market in which the
reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, that
is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date,
considered from the perspective of a market participant that
holds the asset or owes the liability. SFAS 157 provides a
consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price
and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In addition,
SFAS 157 provides a
58
framework for measuring fair value, and establishes a
three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability
as of the measurement date. The three levels of valuation
hierarchy established by SFAS 157 are defined as follows:
Level 1 inputs to the valuation
methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 inputs to the valuation
methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 inputs to the valuation
methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
A financial instruments categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. We invest
primarily in debt and equity of privately held companies for
which quoted prices falling within the categories of
Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are not available.
Therefore, we value all of our investments at fair value, as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors, using
Level 3 inputs, as further described below. Due to the
inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our Board of
Directors estimate of fair value may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market for
the securities existed, and the differences could be material.
In addition, changes in the market environment and other events
that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the
gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be
different than the valuations currently assigned. For a
discussion of the risks inherent in determining the value of
securities for which readily available market values do not
exist, see Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our
Business and Structure Our investment portfolio is
and will continue to be recorded at fair value as determined in
good faith by our board of directors and, as a result, there is
and will continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our
portfolio investments.
Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded and for
which a limited market does not exist are valued at fair value
as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. There is
no single standard for determining fair value in good faith, as
fair value depends upon circumstances of each individual case.
In general, fair value is the amount that we might reasonably
expect to receive upon the current sale of the security.
We evaluate the investments in portfolio companies using the
most recent portfolio company financial statements and
forecasts. We also consult with the portfolio companys
senior management to obtain further updates on the portfolio
companys performance, including information such as
industry trends, new product development and other operational
issues. Additionally, we consider some or all of the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
financial standing of the issuer of the security;
|
|
|
|
comparison of the business and financial plan of the issuer with
actual results;
|
|
|
|
the size of the security held as it relates to the liquidity of
the market for such security;
|
|
|
|
pending public offering of common stock by the issuer of the
security;
|
|
|
|
pending reorganization activity affecting the issuer, such as
merger or debt restructuring;
|
|
|
|
ability of the issuer to obtain needed financing;
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy affecting the issuer;
|
|
|
|
financial statements and reports from portfolio company senior
management and ownership;
|
|
|
|
the type of security, the securitys cost at the date of
purchase and any contractual restrictions on the disposition of
the security;
|
|
|
|
discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the
same class at the time of purchase;
|
|
|
|
special reports prepared by analysts;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the
security
and/or sales
to third parties of similar securities;
|
|
|
|
the issuers ability to make payments and the type of
collateral;
|
|
|
|
the current and forecasted earnings of the issuer;
|
|
|
|
statistical ratios compared to lending standards and to other
similar securities; and
|
|
|
|
other pertinent factors.
|
In making the good faith determination of the value of debt
securities, we start with the cost basis of the security, which
includes the amortized original issue discount, and
payment in kind (PIK) interest, if any.
We also use the risk rating system discussed above under
Investment Rating System to estimate the probability
of default on the debt securities and the probability of loss if
there is a default. The risk rating system covers both
qualitative and quantitative aspects of the business and the
securities held. In valuing debt securities, we utilize an
income approach model that considers factors
including, but not limited to, (i) the portfolio
investments current risk rating (discussed below),
(ii) the portfolio companys current trailing twelve
months (TTM) results of operations as compared
to the portfolio companys TTM results of operations as of
the date the investment was made, (iii) the portfolio
companys current leverage as compared to its leverage as
of the date the investment was made, and (iv) current
pricing and credit metrics for similar proposed and executed
investment transactions. In valuing equity securities of private
companies, we consider valuation methodologies consistent with
industry practice, including (i) valuation using a
valuation model based on original transaction multiples and the
portfolio companys recent financial performance,
(ii) valuation of the securities based on recent sales in
comparable transactions, and (iii) a review of similar
companies that are publicly traded and the market multiple of
their equity securities.
Unrealized appreciation or depreciation on portfolio investments
are recorded as increases or decreases in investments on the
balance sheets and are separately reflected on the statements of
operations in determining net increase or decrease in net assets
resulting from operations.
Determination of the fair value involves subjective judgements
and estimates not susceptible to substantiation by auditing
procedures. Accordingly, under current auditing standards, the
notes to our financial statements will refer to the uncertainty
with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any
change in such valuations, on our financial statements. In
addition, the SBA has established certain valuation guidelines
for SBICs to follow when valuing portfolio investments.
Duff & Phelps, an independent valuation firm, provides
third party valuation consulting services to us, which consist
of certain limited procedures that we identified and requested
Duff & Phelps to perform (hereinafter referred to as
the procedures). We generally request
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on each
portfolio company at least once in every calendar year and for
new portfolio companies, at least once in the twelve-month
period subsequent to the initial investment. In certain
instances, we may determine that it is not cost-effective, and
as a result is not in our stockholders best interest, to
request Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on one
or more portfolio companies. Such instances include, but are not
limited to, situations where the fair value of our investment in
the portfolio company is determined to be insignificant relative
to our total investment portfolio.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in six portfolio companies comprising approximately 35% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of March 31,
2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in five portfolio companies comprising approximately 18% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of June 30,
2008. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in eight portfolio companies comprising approximately 29% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of
September 30, 2008. For the quarter ended December 31,
2008, we asked Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on
investments in eight portfolio companies comprising
approximately 34%
60
of the total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair
value of new investments made during the quarter) as of
December 31, 2008. Upon completion of the procedures,
Duff & Phelps concluded that the fair value, as
determined by the Board of Directors, of those investments
subjected to the procedures did not appear to be unreasonable.
Our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for
determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.
Quarterly
Net Asset Value Determination
We determine the net asset value per share of our common stock
on a quarterly basis. The net asset value per share is equal to
the value of our total assets minus liabilities and any
preferred stock outstanding divided by the total number of
shares of common stock outstanding.
Managerial
Assistance
As a BDC, we offer, and must provide upon request, managerial
assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This
assistance typically involves, among other things, monitoring
the operations of our portfolio companies, participating in
board and management meetings, consulting with and advising
officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. Our senior management
team provides such services. We believe, based on our management
teams combined experience at investment banks, specialty
finance companies, commercial banks, and operating in
executive-level capacities in various operating companies, we
offer this assistance effectively. We may receive fees for these
services.
Competition
We compete for investments with a number of BDCs and investment
funds (including private equity funds, mezzanine funds and other
SBICs), as well as traditional financial services companies such
as commercial banks and other sources of financing. Many of
these entities have greater financial and managerial resources
than we do. We believe we compete with these entities primarily
on the basis of our willingness to make smaller investments, the
experience and contacts of our management team, our responsive
and efficient investment analysis and decision-making processes,
our comprehensive suite of customized financing solutions and
the investment terms we offer.
We believe that some of our competitors make senior secured
loans, junior secured loans and subordinated debt investments
with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the
rates we offer. Therefore, we do not seek to compete primarily
on the interest rates we offer to potential portfolio companies.
Our competitors also do not always require equity components in
their investments. For additional information concerning the
competitive risks we face, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure We may
face increasing competition for investment opportunities.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we employed fourteen individuals,
including investment and portfolio management professionals,
operations professionals and administrative staff. We expect to
expand our management team and administrative staff in the
future in proportion to our growth.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties
materially important to our operation or any of our
subsidiaries. Currently, we lease approximately
11,027 square feet of office space located at
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27612. We believe that our current facilities are
adequate for our business as we intent to conduct it.
Legal
Proceedings
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation
arising out of our operations in the normal course of business
or otherwise, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are
currently not a party to any pending material legal proceedings.
61
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The following table sets forth certain information as of
December 31, 2008 for each portfolio company in which we
had a debt or equity investment. Other than these investments,
our only relationships with our portfolio companies involve the
managerial assistance we may separately provide to our portfolio
companies, such services being to our investments, and the board
observer or participation rights we may receive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Non-Control / Non-Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambient Air Corporation (AA) and Peaden-Hobbs
Mechanical, LLC (PHM) (6%)*
620 West Baldwin Road
Panama City, FL 32405
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Note-AAC
(14%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
3,182,231
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Note-AAC
(18%, Due 03/11)
|
|
|
1,917,045
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock-PHM
(126,634 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants-AAC (455 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,361
|
|
|
|
600,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099,276
|
|
|
|
5,231,971
|
|
|
|
5,689,710
|
|
American De-Rosa Lamparts, LLC
|
|
Wholesale and
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Hallmark Lighting (8%)*
|
|
Distribution
|
|
(15.25%, Due 10/13)
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
1945 S. Tubeway Ave.
Commerce, CA 90040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC (4%)
|
|
Direct Marketing
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 Chesterfield Center, Suite 500
|
|
Services
|
|
(15%, Due 03/15)
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
Chesterfield, MO 63017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
APO Newco, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3080 Bartlett Corporate Drive
|
|
Consumer
|
|
(14%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
Bartlett, TN 38133
|
|
Marketing Products
|
|
Unit purchase warrant
(87,302 Class C units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
1,033,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,932,864
|
|
|
|
2,941,064
|
|
ARC Industries, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Remediation
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 Dalton Avenue
|
|
Services
|
|
(19%, Due 11/10)
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
Charlotte, NC 28225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
Art Headquarters, LLC (3%)*
11885
44th Street
Clearwater, FL 33762
|
|
Retail, Wholesale
and Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/10)
|
|
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
|
|
Membership unit warrants
(15% of units (150 units))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
|
2,350,751
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
Assurance Operations Corp. (4%)*
|
|
Auto Components /
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9341 Highway 43
|
|
Metal Fabrication
|
|
(17%, Due 03/12)
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
3,985,742
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
Killen, AL 35645
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (57 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
4,242,885
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
CV Holdings, LLC (12%)*
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1030 Riverfront Center
|
|
Healthcare Products
|
|
(16%, Due 09/13)
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
Amsterdam, NY 12010
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
Cyrus Networks, LLC (8%)*
4201 Southwest Freeway
|
|
Data Center
Services Provider
|
|
Senior Note
(6%, Due 07/13)
|
|
|
5,539,867
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
Houston, TX 77027
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(9%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of
Credit (6%)
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,989,820
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
DataPath, Inc. (0%)*
350 Technology Pkwy., Suite 400
Norcross, GA 30092
|
|
Satellite
Communication
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(210,263 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Systems Protection, Inc. (5%)*
|
|
Power Protection
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 North Industrial Drive
|
|
Systems
|
|
(14%, Due 12/15)
|
|
|
3,059,267
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
Zebulon, NC 27577
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(500 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989,902
|
|
|
|
4,248,168
|
|
|
|
4,284,168
|
|
Energy Hardware Holdings, LLC (0%)*
|
|
Machined Parts
|
|
Voting Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2730 E. Phillips Road
|
|
Distribution
|
|
(4,833 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greer, SC 29650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
FCL Graphics, Inc. (8%)*
4600 N. Olcott Ave.
|
|
Commercial Printing
Services
|
|
Senior Note
(8%, Due 5/12)
|
|
$
|
1,669,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,663,083
|
|
|
$
|
1,663,083
|
|
Harwood Heights, IL 60706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Note
(12%, Due 5/13)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(18%, Due 11/13)
|
|
|
3,393,186
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062,386
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. (1%)*
705 E. Harrison Street, Suite 200
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Notes
(12%, Due 04/11)
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,356,781
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Corona, CA 92879
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(283 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,905
|
|
|
|
11,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,639,686
|
|
|
|
1,011,719
|
|
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (4%)*
15822 Bernardo Center Drive
San Diego, CA 92127
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
2nd Lien
Note
(11%, Due 12/11)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(5,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
583,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,583,600
|
|
Gerli & Company (2%)*
75 Stark Street
|
|
Specialty Woven
Fabrics
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 08/11)
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,092,786
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
Plains, PA 18705
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock Warrants
(56,559 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,176,200
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
Holding Company, LLC (10%)*
|
|
Cleaning and Repair
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
350 N. Old Woodward, Ste. 100
Birmingham, MI 48009
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant (2.5)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,300
|
|
|
|
1,407,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,985,565
|
|
|
|
8,829,565
|
|
Jenkins Services, LLC (10%)*
45681 Oakbrook Ct., Ste. 113
|
|
Restoration
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(17.5%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
8,411,172
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
Sterling, VA 20166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Note
(10%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,786,172
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
Library Systems & Services, LLC (3%)*
12850 Middlebrook Road
|
|
Municipal Business
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12%, Due 03/11)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,948,573
|
|
|
|
1,948,573
|
|
Germantown, MD 20874
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (112 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,995
|
|
|
|
802,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,007,568
|
|
|
|
2,751,073
|
|
Novolyte Technologies, Inc.(8%)*
111 West Irene Road
Zachory, LA 70791
|
|
Specialty
Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16%, Due 04/15)
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
(600 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(22,960 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
Syrgis Holdings, Inc. (6%)*
1025 Mary Laidley Drive
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note
(7%, Due 08/12-02/14)
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
Covington, KY 41017
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(2,114 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
5,602,773
|
|
|
|
5,135,473
|
|
TrustHouse Services Group, Inc. (5%)*
21 Armory Drive
|
|
Food Management
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 09/15)
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
Wheeling, WV 26003
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(1,495 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Units
(79 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,686,542
|
|
|
|
4,394,042
|
|
Twin-Star International, Inc. (6%)*
115 S.E. 4th Avenue
|
|
Consumer Home
Furnishings
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
Delray Beach, FL 33483
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note
(8%, Due 04/13)
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,801,921
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
Waste Recyclers Holdings, LLC (13%)
261 Highway 20 East
|
|
Environmental and
Facilities Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15.5%, Due 01/13)
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
Suite A, B & D
Freeport, FL 32439
|
|
|
|
Class A Preferred Units
(300 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Purchase
Warrant (1,170,083 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(153,219 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Wholesale Floors, Inc. (4%)*
8855 N. Black Canyon Highway
|
|
Commercial
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 06/14)
|
|
$
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,341,947
|
|
|
$
|
3,341,947
|
|
Phoenix, AZ 85021
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant (4.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,474,747
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
Yellowstone Landscape Group, Inc. (14%)*
|
|
Landscaping
|
|
Subordinated Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 Elm Street
|
|
Services
|
|
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
New Canaan, CT 06840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control / Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,090,259
|
|
|
|
138,413,589
|
|
|
|
135,712,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Point, LLC (6%)*
770 Pelham Road, Suite 200
|
|
Asset Management
Software Provider
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
|
5,035,428
|
|
|
|
5,035,428
|
|
Greenville, SC 29615
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(10 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
371,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
|
5,535,428
|
|
|
|
5,406,828
|
|
Axxiom Manufacturing, Inc (3%)*
11927 South Highway 6
|
|
Industrial
Equipment
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/11)
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
Fresno, TX 77545
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(34,100 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
408,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,303,277
|
|
|
|
2,522,777
|
|
Brantley Transportation, LLC
(Brantley Transportation) and
Pine Street Holdings, LLC
(Pine Street)(4) (4%)*
808 N. Ruth Street
Monahans, TX 79756
|
|
Oil and Gas
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
Brantley Transportation
(14%, Due 12/12)
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Warrants
Brantley Transportation
(4,560 common units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
41,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
Pine Street (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
139,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pine Street (2,220 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,924,125
|
|
|
|
3,871,525
|
|
Dyson Corporation (12%)*
53 Freedom Road
Painesville, OH 44077
|
|
Custom Forging and
Fastener supplies
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 12/13)
|
|
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(1,000,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
964,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
|
11,123,339
|
|
|
|
11,088,039
|
|
Equisales, LLC (9%)*
13811 Cullen Blvd.
|
|
Energy Products
and Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/12)
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
Houston, TX 77047
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(500,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,322,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,726,387
|
|
|
|
8,548,787
|
|
Flint Acquisition Corporation (2%)*
115 Todd Court
Thomasville, NC 27360
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Preferred Stock
(9,875 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
Genapure Corporation (1%)*
1205 Industrial Blvd. 18966
Southampton, PA
|
|
Lab Testing
Services
|
|
Common Stock
5,594 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,686,027
|
|
|
|
30,484,491
|
|
|
|
33,894,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischbein, LLC (14%)*
151 Walker Road
|
|
Packaging and
Materials Handling
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16.5%, Due 05/13)
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
7,053,458
|
|
|
|
7,053,458
|
|
Statesville, NC 28625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
Manufacturer
|
|
Membership Units
(4,200,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
|
5,444,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments, December 31, 2008 (199%)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,960,352
|
|
|
$
|
180,151,538
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
* |
|
Value as a percent of net assets |
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Common stock,
preferred stock and all warrants are non-income producing. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest rates on subordinated debt include cash interest rate
and, where applicable,
paid-in-kind
interest rate. |
|
(3) |
|
All investments are restricted as to resale and were valued at
fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. |
|
(4) |
|
Pine Street Holdings, LLC is the majority owner of Brantley
Transportation, LLC, and its sole business purpose is its
ownership of Brantley Transportation, LLC. |
65
Description
of our Portfolio Companies
Set forth below is a brief description of each of our portfolio
companies as of June 30, 2008.
Ambient
Air Corporation (f/k/a JR Hobbs Acquisition Corp.)
Ambient Air Corporation is a leading design/build contractor for
HVAC systems in the multi-family housing industry with an
emphasis on the Southeast.
American
Direct Marketing Resources, LLC
American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC is a full-service
direct marketing services company specializing in turnkey direct
mail programs.
American
De-Rosa Lamparts and Hallmark Lighting
American De-Rosa Lamparts and Hallmark Lighting, headquartered
in Commerce, California, markets a wide variety of lighting
products, including fixtures, bulbs, electrical components,
glass, and hardware to maintenance and repair organizations,
lighting wholesalers, retailers, and original equipment
manufacturers.
American
Paper Optics (APO Newco, LLC)
American Paper Optics is a leading manufacturer and marketer of
3-D glasses
and 3-D
products.
ARC
Industries, LLC (d/b/a Haz-Mat)
ARC Industries, LLC provides environmental services through
removal and disposal services of industrial liquid wastes,
including waste water, sludges and waste oils, to industrial
customers generally within a
200-mile
radius of Charlotte, North Carolina.
Art
Headquarters, LLC
Art Headquarters, LLC is a supplier of custom frame
shop-quality, mid-priced framed art sold throughout the eastern
United States.
AssetPoint,
LLC
AssetPoint, LLC is a supplier of integrated enterprise asset
management and computerized maintenance management software and
services that improve profitability and productivity for the
process and manufacturing industries.
Assurance
Operations Corporation
Assurance Operations Corp. designs and fabricates custom racking
products for the automotive industry and provides light to
medium duty stamping for a variety of industries.
Axxiom
Manufacturing, Inc.
Axxiom Manufacturing Inc., based in Fresno, Texas, is the
exclusive provider of Axxiom and Schmidt abrasive air blast
equipment.
Brantley
Transportation, LLC and Pine Street Holdings, LLC
Brantley Transportation, LLC is an oil services company based in
Monahans, Texas, which provides oil and gas rig and associated
heavy equipment intrastate hauling services primarily to
drilling companies operating in Texas and New Mexico, as well as
oil and gas producing regions in the Mid Continent. Pine Street
Holdings, LLC is the majority owner of Brantley Transportation,
LLC, and its sole business purpose is its ownership of Brantley
Transportation, LLC.
66
CV
Holdings, LLC
CV Holdings, LLC designs, manufactures and markets customized,
high-performance polymer products.
Cyrus
Networks, LLC
CyrusOne, based in Houston, Texas, ensures the availability of
mission-critical computing systems for businesses through
network neutral colocation and managed services. The company has
focused its business model around catering to the enterprise
customer, particularly in those industry segments where dense
computing needs exist and will frame the future of information
technology outsourcing decisions.
DataPath,
Inc.
DataPath, Inc. is an integrator and provider of ground based
satellite communications systems for government and commercial
customers.
Dyson
Corporation
Dyson Corporation is a supplier of custom fasteners and forgings
to industrial markets, including the high-growth wind energy
industry.
Electronic
Systems Protection, Inc.
Electronic Systems Protection, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of
power protection technology for the office technology industry.
Energy
Hardware Holdings, LLC
Energy Hardware Holdings, LLC is a global distributor of
fasteners, machined parts, seals and gaskets to the power
generation industry.
Equisales,
LLC
Equisales, LLC is a global provider of transformers, high
voltage switch gear and power production equipment.
FCL
Graphics, Inc.
FCL Graphics, Inc. is a leading commercial printer which
produces such items as direct mailings, brochures, annual
reports, posters, catalogs, sell sheets, newspaper inserts and
labels.
Fire
Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. designs and installs sprinkler
systems for residential applications throughout southern
California.
Fischbein,
LLC
Fischbein, LLC is a leading designer and manufacturer of
flexible packaging and materials handling equipment based in
Statesville, North Carolina.
Flint
Acquisition Corporation (d/b/a Flint Trading)
Flint Trading and related entities serve the traffic safety
market with a focus on road markings, street graphics and road
warning markers.
67
Garden
Fresh Restaurant Corp.
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. is a casual dining restaurant
chain focused on serving fresh, wholesome meals in an upscale,
self-service format. The company operates approximately 100
restaurants in 15 states under the Sweet Tomatoes and
Souplantation brand names.
Genapure
(QC Labs) and Genpref, LLC
Genapure provides lab testing services for the environmental
engineering, food and pharmaceutical industries. Services
include groundwater monitoring, stream surveys, soil testing,
swimming pool testing, and dairy product testing. Genpref is the
sole owner of Genapures preferred stock, and its sole
business purpose is its ownership of Genapures preferred
stock.
Gerli &
Company
Gerli & Company markets high-end decorative fabrics to
a diverse customer base focusing on interior design. The company
has dobby and jacquard manufacturing in Plains, Pennsylvania and
sources fabrics worldwide. It is best known for its color
direction and design aesthetic in the broad range of fabric
types offered.
Inland
Pipe Rehabilitation Holding Company, LLC
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Holding Company, LLC provides
maintenance, inspection, and repair for piping, sewers, drains,
and storm lines by utilizing several of the industrys
leading technologies including pipe bursting,
cured-in-place-pipe,
and spiral-wound piping.
Jenkins
Services, LLC
Jenkins Services, LLC, headquartered in Sterling, Virginia, is a
provider of insurance restoration services, focusing on
reconstruction and repair of damage to residential and
commercial buildings caused by fire, wind, storm, vandalism, or
burglary.
Library
Systems & Services, LLC
Library Systems & Services, LLC is a provider of
outsourced library management services in the U.S., with
customers including federal libraries such as the Library of
Congress and the Smithsonian.
Novolyte
Technologies, Inc.
Novolyte Technologies, Inc. is a manufacturer of electrolytes
and materials used for lithium batteries, ultracapacitors and
other energy storage devices, solvents used in a variety of
industrial processes and products, electronic materials, polymer
ingredients, and pharmaceutical and agricultural chemicals.
Porters
Group, LLC (d/b/a Porters Fabrications)
Porters Group, LLC is a supplier of high-quality custom
fabricated metal parts to customers in the transportation,
industrial and commercial sectors.
Syrgis
Holdings, Inc.
Syrgis Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Covington, Kentucky, is
a holding company comprised of four distinct specialty chemical
subsidiaries. Through its operating subsidiaries, Syrgis
manufactures specialty chemicals critical to the performance of
products in diverse industries, including natural gas and oil
refineries, cleaning solutions and supplies, and various lumber
products.
68
TrustHouse
Services Group, Inc.
TrustHouse Services Group, Inc. provides outsourced food
management services to educational institutions, healthcare
facilities and businesses primarily in the Northeast,
Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions of the United States.
Twin
Star International, Inc.
Twin Star International, Inc., based in Delray Beach, Florida,
is a leading producer of high quality home furnishings,
including electric fireplaces and decorative bathroom vanities.
Waste
Recyclers Holdings, LLC
Waste Recyclers Holdings, LLC is one of the largest independent
providers of waste management services in the Florida and
Alabama/Mississippi Gulf Coast region.
Wholesale
Floors, Inc.
Wholesale Floors, Inc., headquartered near Phoenix, Arizona,
provides commercial flooring design and installation services
for institutional and corporate clients and is the largest
full-service flooring contractor in the state of Arizona.
Yellowstone
Landscape Group, Inc.
Yellowstone Landscape Group, Inc., headquartered in Dallas,
Texas, is a full-service lawn care provider focused primarily on
the commercial market with services including lawn and landscape
maintenance, construction/installation, irrigation, turf
management, and tree care throughout Texas and the Southeast.
69
MANAGEMENT
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
board of directors. Our board of directors elects our officers,
who serve at the discretion of the board of directors.
Day-to-day management of our portfolio is the responsibility of
our investment committee. As a result, our investment committee
must approve the acquisition and disposition of all of our
investments.
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers
Our board of directors consists of seven members, four of whom
are classified under applicable Nasdaq listing standards as
independent directors. Pursuant to our articles of
incorporation, each member of our board of directors serves a
one year term, with each current director serving until the 2009
annual meeting of stockholders and until his respective
successor is duly qualified and elected. Our articles of
incorporation permit the board of directors to elect directors
to fill vacancies that are created either through an increase in
the number of directors or due to the resignation, removal or
death of any director.
Directors
Information regarding our board of directors is set forth below.
We have divided the directors into two groups
independent directors and interested directors. Interested
directors are interested persons of Triangle Capital
Corporation as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
Certain of our directors who are also officers of the Company
may serve as directors of, or on the boards of managers of,
certain of our portfolio companies. In addition, the board of
directors of Triangle SBIC is composed of all of the
Companys directors. The business address of each director
listed below is 3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27612. For information regarding our
directors compensation, see Director
Compensation below, and for information regarding our
directors ownership interest in our Companys stock,
see Control Persons and Principal Stockholders below.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration of
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Current Term
|
|
W. McComb Dunwoody
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
January 2007
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Benjamin S. Goldstein
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
January 2007
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Simon B. Rich, Jr.
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
January 2007
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Sherwood H. Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
January 2007
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration of
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Current Term
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
October 2006
|
|
2009 Annual Meeting
|
70
Executive
Officers
The following persons serve as our executive officers in the
following capacities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s) Held with the Company
|
|
Officer Since
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Brent P.W. Burgess
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Director and Chief Investment Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
In addition to the positions described above, each of our
executive officers is a member of our investment committee. The
address for each executive officer is
c/o Triangle
Capital Corporation, 3700 Glenwood Avenue,
Suite 530, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612. For information
regarding our executive officers compensation, see
Executive Compensation below, and for information
regarding our executive officers ownership interest in our
Companys stock, see Control Persons and Principal
Stockholders below.
Biographical
Information
Independent
Directors
W. McComb Dunwoody. Mr. Dunwoody currently
serves on our Board of Directors and is a member of our
compensation committee and our nominating and corporate
governance committee. He is the founder of The Inverness Group
Incorporated and a Managing Member of Inverness Management LLC,
a private equity investment firm that specializes in management
buyout transactions. Inverness is not a parent, subsidiary or
other affiliate of Triangle. Prior to Inverness,
Mr. Dunwoody began the Corporate Finance Department of
First City National Bank of Houston as a Senior Vice President.
From 1968 to 1975, he worked in New York as an investment banker
with The First Boston Corporation and Donaldson,
Lufkin & Jenrette. Mr. Dunwoody currently serves
on various corporate boards of directors and was formerly the
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of
National-Oilwell, Inc. Mr. Dunwoodys community
involvement includes the co-founding of Imagine College, an
education program serving over 5,000 inner-city students. He
received an undergraduate degree in Business Administration from
the University of Texas Honors Program.
Benjamin S. Goldstein. Mr. Goldstein currently
serves on our Board of Directors and is a member of our audit
committee and our compensation committee. He is currently the
President and co-founder of The Advisory Group, LLC, a real
estate advisory, development and investment firm based in Cary,
North Carolina. The Advisory Group is not a parent, subsidiary
or other affiliate of Triangle. Mr. Goldstein is also
active in his community, as he currently serves on the boards of
the Wake Education Partnership, based in Raleigh,
North Carolina, as well as Paragon Commercial Bank. Prior
to co-founding The Advisory Group, Mr. Goldstein was
President and Partner of Roanoke Properties, the developer of a
residential resort real estate community on the Outer Banks of
North Carolina, which had a build out value of over
$300 million. He spent three years in the securities
business, having been the Chief Financial Officer of Carolina
Securities Corporation for one year, and later named to head the
Carolina Securities Division of Thomson McKinnon Corporation,
which had acquired Carolina Securities. He began his career at
KPMG, where he worked with audit and consulting clients with an
emphasis on the real estate industry. A native of North
Carolina, Mr. Goldstein graduated from UNC-Chapel Hill with
a degree in business.
Simon B. Rich, Jr. Mr. Rich currently serves on
our Board of Directors and is a member of our audit committee
and our nominating and corporate governance committee. He
retired in 2001 from his positions as Chief Executive Officer of
Louis Dreyfus Holding Co. and Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas, two affiliated Delaware
and Oklahoma companies, respectively, neither of which was a
parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of Triangle. As CEO,
Mr. Richs companies combined operations
included roles such as oil refinery processing, petroleum
product storage and distribution, natural gas production and
distribution and the merchandising and distribution of
electricity in North America and Europe, as well as the
merchandising and processing of agricultural products in North
America, South America and Europe. During
71
Mr. Richs tenure, his companies successfully
partnered with Electricite de France, creating EDF Trading, a
company that currently dispatches Frances electric
generation system. His work experience, which spans more than
thirty years, includes all aspects of the energy and agriculture
industries. His expertise involves private equity investments
with an emphasis on sustainability in energy and agriculture. In
addition to Mr. Richs career in the energy and
agriculture industries, he currently serves as a trustee of
Warren Wilson College and serves on the Board of Directors of
Environmental Defense. Mr. Rich is also the former Chairman
of the Board of Visitors of The Nicholas School of the
Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University, where he is
now Emeritus and an adjunct instructor. Mr. Rich holds an
undergraduate degree in Economics from Duke University.
Sherwood H. Smith, Jr. Mr. Smith currently
serves on our Board of Directors and is a member of our audit
committee, our compensation committee and our nominating and
corporate governance committee. He currently serves as a
director of Franklin Street Partners, a privately held
investment management firm in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mr. Smith is also active in his community, as he currently
serves as a director and Vice Chairman of the Research Triangle
Foundation and as a Trustee and Chairman of the Triangle
Universities Center for Advanced Studies, Inc. Until 2000 he
served as a director of Carolina Power & Light Company
(now Progress Energy Corporation), a company for which he has
also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
In addition, Mr. Smith has served as a director of Wachovia
Corporation (now Wells Fargo and Company), Nortel Networks,
Springs Industries, and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
Company (Trustee). Other than his current position as director,
Mr. Smith has never been employed by a parent, subsidiary
or other affiliate of Triangle. He has been a member of the
Business Roundtable and The Business Council and has served as
Chairman of the North Carolina Citizens for Business and
Industry. Mr. Smith has both an undergraduate and law
degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Interested
Directors
Garland S. Tucker, III. Mr. Tucker currently
serves as Chairman of our Board of Directors, Chief Executive
Officer, and President and is a member of our investment
committee. Mr. Tucker was a co-founder of Triangle Capital
Partners LLC, the former external manager of Triangle Mezzanine
Fund prior to our IPO. Prior to co-founding Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC in 2000, Mr. Tucker and an outside investor
group sold First Travelcorp, a corporate travel services company
that he and the investors founded in 1991. For the two years
preceding the founding of First Travelcorp, Mr. Tucker
served as Group Vice President, Chemical Bank, New York, with
responsibility for southeastern corporate finance. Prior to
Chemical Bank, Mr. Tucker spent a decade with Carolina
Securities Corporation, serving as President and Chief Executive
Officer until 1988. During his tenure, Carolina Securities
Corporation was a member of the New York Stock Exchange, and
Mr. Tucker served a term as President of the Mid-Atlantic
Securities Industry Association. Mr. Tucker entered the
securities business in 1975 with Investment Corporation of
Virginia. He is a graduate of Washington & Lee
University and Harvard Business School.
Brent P. W. Burgess. Mr. Burgess currently serves as
our Chief Investment Officer and is a member of our Board of
Directors and our investment committee. Mr. Burgess was a
co-founder of Triangle Capital Partners, LLC. Prior to joining
Triangle, he was Vice President for five years at Oberlin
Capital, an SBIC mezzanine fund. He began his private equity
career in 1996 with Cherokee International Management, a Raleigh
based private equity firm, where he worked as an analyst and
associate. He previously served on the Board of Governors of the
National Association of SBICs and is a past president of the
Southern Regional Association of SBICs. He is a graduate of the
University of Regina and Regent College, Vancouver.
Steven C. Lilly. Mr. Lilly currently serves as our
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Compliance Officer and is a member of our Board of Directors and
our investment committee. Prior to joining Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC in December, 2005, Mr. Lilly spent six and a
half years with SpectraSite, Inc., which prior to its sale in
August, 2005, was the third largest independent wireless tower
company in the United States. At SpectraSite,
Mr. Lilly served as Senior Vice
President-Finance & Treasurer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer. Prior to SpectraSite, Mr. Lilly was Vice
President of the Media & Communications Group with
First Union Capital Markets (now Wells Fargo and Company),
specializing in arranging financings for high growth, financial
sponsor driven companies across the media and telecommunications
sector.
72
Mr. Lilly is a graduate of Davidson College and has
completed the executive education program at the University of
North Carolinas Kenan-Flagler School of Business.
Other
Members of Investment Committee
Tarlton H. Long. Mr. Long is a member of our
investment committee. From 1990 to 2000, prior to co-founding
Triangle Capital Partners, LLC, Mr. Long was with Banc of
America Securities and its predecessor organizations as they
initiated development of a full service investment banking
platform. As a managing director with Banc of America
Securities, Mr. Long established and headed the Industrial
Growth Group. From 1979 to 1990, Mr. Long was with The First
Boston Corporation (now Credit Suisse) becoming a Director in
the Corporate Finance Department. Mr. Long began his career in
finance in 1976 with White Weld & Co., New York. Mr.
Long is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill and New York University.
David F. Parker. Mr. Parker is a member of our
investment committee. Prior to joining us, Mr. Parker was a
partner in Crimson Capital Company, a Greensboro, North Carolina
private investment banking firm that specialized in management
buyouts of middle market companies in a variety of industries.
Before joining Crimson, Mr. Parker was Vice-President and
Treasurer at Marion Laboratories, Inc., a Fortune 500
pharmaceutical company, where Mr. Parker was responsible for
Marions public and private financings, venture capital
investments, divestitures, and investor communications. Before
working at Marion Laboratories, Mr. Parker worked six years as
Vice-President and Director of Private Placements at J. Henry
Schroder Corp, a position that followed three years at Kidder,
Peabody & Co., on its private placement desk.
Mr. Parker began his career in 1971 at Shearson,
Hammill & Co. in New York. Mr. Parker is a graduate of
North Carolina State University and Harvard Business School.
Meetings
of the Board of Directors and Committees
During 2008, our Board of Directors held five board meetings.
Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, a
compensation committee, a nominating and corporate governance
committee and an investment committee. Each of the audit
committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate
governance committee operates pursuant to a charter, each of
which is available under Corporate Governance on the
Investor Relations section of our website at the following URL:
http://ir.tcap.com,
and is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a
copy.
We have designated Simon B. Rich, Jr. as the presiding
director of all executive sessions of non-employee directors.
Executive sessions of non-employee directors are held at least
quarterly. Stockholders may communicate with Mr. Rich by
writing to: Board of Directors, Triangle Capital Corporation,
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27612.
Audit
Committee
We have a separately-designated standing audit committee
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Exchange Act. The audit committee is responsible for compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements, selecting our
independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the
plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with our
independent registered public accounting firm, approving
professional services provided by our independent registered
public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of our
independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the
integrity of the audits of the financial statements and
reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
Our Board of Directors adopted the Audit Committee Charter on
January 31, 2007. The Audit Committee Charter is publicly
available under Corporate Governance on the Investor
Relations section of our website at the following URL:
http://ir.tcap.com.
The members of the audit committee are Messrs. Goldstein, Rich
and Smith, each of whom is independent for purposes of
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act and the Nasdaq Global
Market corporate governance listing standards.
Mr. Goldstein serves as the chairman of the audit
committee. Our Board of
73
Directors has determined that Mr. Goldstein is an
audit committee financial expert as defined under
Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
of the Exchange Act. Mr. Goldstein meets the current
independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act, Nasdaq listing standards, and, in addition,
is not an interested person of the Company, as
defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our audit
committee held five meetings during 2008.
Compensation
Committee
The compensation committee is appointed by the Board to
discharge its responsibilities relating to the compensation of
our executive officers and other key employees. The compensation
committee has the responsibility for recommending appropriate
compensation levels for our executive officers, evaluating and
approving executive officer compensation plans, policies and
programs, reviewing benefit plans for executive officers and
other employees and producing an annual report on executive
compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement. The
compensation committee may delegate any of its responsibilities
to a subcommittee so long as such subcommittee is solely
composed of one of more members of the compensation committee.
The Compensation Committee Charter is available under
Corporate Governance on the Investor Relations
section of our website at the following URL:
http://ir.tcap.com.
Members of our compensation committee review annually and
approve goals and objectives relevant to our executive
officers compensation, including annual performance
objectives. They evaluate annually the performance of the chief
executive officer and other executive officers, and recommend to
the independent directors of the Board the compensation level
for each such person based on this evaluation. They review on a
periodic basis our executive compensation programs to determine
whether they are properly coordinated and achieve their intended
purposes. They review and recommend to the Board for approval
any changes in incentive compensation plans and equity-based
compensation plans. The members of the compensation committee
review and approve all equity-based compensation plans of
Triangle, whether or not final approval rests with the
Companys stockholders, and grant equity-based awards
pursuant to such plans in compliance with the 1940 Act. They
review and approve employment agreements and any special
supplemental benefits or perquisites for our executive officers.
They review broadly employee compensation strategies, including
salary levels and ranges and employee fringe benefits, in
conjunction with compensation consultants.
In determining executive compensation levels for our executive
officers, the compensation committee meets at least annually
with management, and may meet with compensation consultants, in
order to determine whether current methods of executive
compensation are effective in achieving Triangles short
and long term strategies. The compensation committee, in
conjunction with a compensation consultant if necessary, will
analyze the compensation of executive officers and directors of
other BDCs in order to establish the compensation levels
necessary to attract and retain quality executive officers and
investment professionals. For more information regarding the
role of Triangles management in determining compensation,
please see the discussion in Compensation of Directors and
Executive Officers Executive
Compensation Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Establishing Compensation
Levels Role of the Compensation Committee and
Management.
The members of the compensation committee are
Messrs. Dunwoody, Goldstein and Smith, each of whom is
independent for purposes of Section 2(a)(19) the 1940 Act
and the Nasdaq Global Market corporate governance listing
standards. Mr. Smith serves as the chairman of the
compensation committee. Our compensation committee held three
meetings during 2008.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible
for identifying, researching and nominating directors for
election by our stockholders, selecting nominees to fill
vacancies on our Board of Directors or a committee of the Board,
developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of
corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of
the Board of Directors and our management. The nominating and
corporate governance committees policy is to consider
nominees properly recommended by our stockholders in accordance
with our charter, bylaws and applicable law. Pursuant to our
bylaws, stockholders wishing to submit proposals or director
nominations that are to be included in our annual proxy
74
materials must have given timely notice thereof in writing to
our corporate secretary. For example, to be timely for the 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a stockholder must notify our
corporate secretary, in writing, not later than 5:00 p.m.
(Eastern Time) on December 30, 2009, nor earlier than
November 30, 2009. Our bylaws also contain additional
requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and
director nominations, including the different notice submission
date requirements in the event that the date of our Annual
Meeting of Stockholders is advanced or delayed by more than
thirty days from the first anniversary of the date of the
preceding years annual writing.
In considering possible candidates for nomination, the
nominating and corporate governance committee will consider
certain factors including whether the composition of the Board
contains a majority of independent directors as determined by
the Nasdaq Global Market standards and the 1940 Act, the
candidates character and integrity, whether the candidate
possesses an inquiring mind, vision and the ability to work well
with others, conflicts of interest interfering with the proper
performance of the responsibilities of a director, a
candidates experience, whether the candidate has
sufficient time to devote to the affairs of Triangle, including
consistent attendance at Board and committee meetings and
advance review of materials and whether each candidate can be
trusted to act in the best interests of us and all of our
stockholders.
Our Board of Directors adopted the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter on January 31, 2007. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is
publicly available under Corporate Governance on the
Investor Relations section of our website at the following
URL: http://ir.tcap.com.
The members of the nominating and corporate governance committee
are Messrs. Rich, Dunwoody and Smith, each of whom is
independent for purposes of Section 2(a)(19) the 1940 Act
and the Nasdaq Global Market corporate governance listing
standards. Mr. Rich serves as the chairman of the
nominating and corporate governance committee. Our nominating
and corporate governance committee held two meetings during 2008.
Investment
Committee
Our investment committee is responsible for all aspects of our
investment process. The members of the Triangle Capital
Corporation investment committee are Messrs. Tucker, Burgess,
Lilly, Jeffrey A. Dombcik, Douglas A. Vaughn,
Tariton H. Long and David F. Parker. Triangle
Mezzanine Fund has a separate investment committee that is
responsible for all aspects of our investment process relating
to investments made by Triangle Mezzanine Fund. The members of
the Triangle Mezzanine Fund investment committee are also
Messrs. Tucker, Burgess, Lilly, Dombcik, Vaughn, Long and
Parker. Each of Messrs. Dombciks and Vaughns
appointments to the Triangle Mezzanine Fund investment committee
is contingent upon our receiving approval from the United States
Small Business Administration (which regulates Small Business
Investment Companies, or SBICs, such as Triangle Mezzanine
Fund). For purposes of the discussion herein, any reference to
the investment committee refers to both the
investment committee of Triangle Capital Corporation and the
investment committee of Triangle Mezzanine Fund.
Our investment committee generally meets once a week but also
meets on an as needed basis depending on transaction volume. Our
investment committee is involved in all significant stages of
the investment process, including origination, due diligence and
underwriting, approval, documentation and closing, and portfolio
management and investment monitoring.
Code
of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines
We have adopted a code of conduct and corporate governance
guidelines covering ethics and business conduct. These documents
apply to our directors, officers and employees. Our code of
conduct and corporate governance guidelines are available on the
Investor Relations section of our website at the following
URL: http://ir.tcap.com.
We will report any material amendments to or waivers of a
required provision of our code of conduct and corporate
governance guidelines on our website and/or in a Current Report
on
Form 8-K.
75
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Our directors are divided into two groups interested
directors and independent directors. Interested directors are
interested persons as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. The compensation table
below sets forth compensation that our independent directors
earned during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our
interested directors are not compensated for their service as
Board members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
W. McComb Dunwoody
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
12,283
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,070
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
46,353
|
|
Thomas M. Garrott, III(3)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
15,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,533
|
|
Benjamin S. Goldstein
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
32,283
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,070
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
69,353
|
|
Simon B. Rich, Jr.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
29,033
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,070
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
63,103
|
|
Sherwood H. Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
30,033
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,070
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
64,103
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Value of restricted stock awards granted to each non-employee
director on May 7, 2008. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes fair market value of shares received pursuant to our
Dividend Reinvestment Plan relating to restricted stock awards
granted to director. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On August 12, 2008, Mr. Garrott resigned as a member
of our Board of Directors for health related concerns. He was
therefore only paid for board service through August 12,
2008, and his $30,000 worth of restricted stock did not vest. |
Director
Fees
In 2008, each of our directors who were not one of our employees
or an employee of our subsidiaries earned an annual fee of
$30,000 worth of restricted stock in Triangle, calculated based
on the share price of our common stock as of the close of the
Nasdaq Global Market May 7, 2008, the date of grant. Based
on this calculation, each of our independent directors received
2,700 shares of restricted stock, which will vest on
May 6, 2009, so long as each individual is still a director
at that time.
In addition, independent directors received a fee of $2,500 for
each board meeting attended in person and $1,250 for each board
meeting attended by conference telephone or similar
communications equipment; audit committee members receive a fee
of $1,500 for each audit committee meeting attended in person
and $750 for each audit committee meeting attended by conference
telephone or similar communication equipment; and members of our
compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance
committee receive a fee of $1,000 for each committee meeting
attended in person and $500 for each committee meeting attended
by conference telephone or similar communication equipment.
Finally, our audit committee chairman receives an annual fee of
$10,000, and each of our compensation committee and nominating
and corporate governance committee chairmen received an annual
fee of $5,000 for their services as chairmen of their respective
committees. The Director Compensation Table above takes into
account all changes in director compensation made during the
2008 fiscal year. We also reimbursed our independent directors
for all reasonable direct
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board.
Directors who are also our employees or employees of our
subsidiaries did not receive compensation for their services as
directors.
Non-Employee
Director Equity Compensation
Our Board of Directors and sole stockholder approved
Triangles 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Original
Plan, effective February 13, 2007, for the purpose of
attracting and retaining the services of executive officers,
directors and other key employees. During our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, no equity incentive awards were granted
under the Original Plan, in part due to certain 1940 Act
restrictions which disallow the issuance of certain types of
compensation to a business development companys employees
and non-employee directors without having first obtained
exemptive relief. In 2007, we filed a request with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for such
exemptive relief with respect to our ability to
76
issue restricted stock to our employees and non-employee
directors. On March 18, 2008 we received an order from the
SEC authorizing such issuance of restricted stock to our
employees and non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of
the Amended and Restated Plan and as otherwise set forth in the
exemptive order. In 2008, our Board approved, and at the 2008
Annual Stockholders Meeting the stockholders voted to approve,
the Triangle Capital Corporation Amended and Restated 2007
Equity Incentive Plan, or the Amended and Restated Plan. During
our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we granted
restricted share awards to our officers, directors and key
employees as compensation related to performance in 2007.
The following is a summary of the material features of the
Amended and Restated Plan. It may not contain all of the
information important to you. The Amended and Restated Plan
includes provisions allowing the issuance of restricted stock to
all key employees and directors. Restricted stock refers to an
award of stock that is subject to forfeiture restrictions and
may not be transferred until such restrictions have lapsed. The
Amended and Restated Plan will also allow us to issue options to
our key employees in the future should our Board and
compensation committee choose to do so.
Under the Amended and Restated Plan, up to 900,000 shares
of our common stock are authorized for issuance. Participants in
the Amended and Restated Plan who are employees and employee
directors may receive awards of options to purchase shares of
common stock or grants of restricted stock, as determined by the
Board. Participants who are non-employee directors may receive
awards of restricted stock in accordance with certain parameters
as discussed below under Restricted Stock Awards to
Non-Employee Directors. The basis of such participation is
to provide incentives to our employees and directors in order to
attract and retain the services of qualified professionals.
Options granted under the Amended and Restated Plan entitle the
optionee, upon exercise, to purchase shares of common stock at a
specified exercise price per share. Options must have a per
share exercise price of no less than the fair market value of a
share of stock on the date of the grant, subject to forfeiture
provisions as determined by the Board. The exercise period of
each stock option awarded will expire on a date determined by
the Board, such date to be specified in the stock option award
agreement; however, the Plan also states that no stock option
award will be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from
the date such stock option was granted.
The Amended and Restated Plan permits the issuance of restricted
stock to employees and directors consistent with such terms and
conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate, subject to the
limitations set forth in the plan. With respect to awards issued
to our employees and officers, the Board will determine the time
or times at which such shares of restricted stock will become
exercisable and the terms on which such shares will remain
exercisable. Shares granted pursuant to a restricted stock award
will not be transferable until such shares have vested in
accordance with the terms of the award agreement, unless the
transfer is by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
The Amended and Restated Plan provides that our non-employee
directors each receive an automatic grant of restricted stock at
the beginning of each one-year term of service on the Board, for
which forfeiture restrictions lapse one year from the grant
date. The number of shares granted to each non-employee director
in 2008 was the equivalent of $30,000 worth of shares, taken at
the market value at the close of the Nasdaq Global Market on the
date of grant, which historically has been the date of our
annual stockholders meeting. Going forward in 2009 and beyond,
the grants of restricted stock to non-employee directors under
the Amended and Restated Plan will be automatic (that is, the
grants will equal $30,000 worth of restricted stock each year),
and the terms thereunder will not be changed without SEC
approval. Shares granted pursuant to a restricted stock award
will not be transferable until such shares have vested in
accordance with the terms of the award agreement, unless the
transfer is by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
Our Board of Directors has delegated administration of the
Amended and Restated Plan to its compensation committee,
currently comprised solely of three (3) independent
directors who are independent pursuant to the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market. Our Board may abolish
such committee at any time and revest in our Board the
administration of the Amended and Restated Plan. Our Board
administers the Amended and Restated Plan in a manner that is
consistent with the applicable requirements of the Nasdaq Global
Market and the exemptive order.
77
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
General
In 2008, our senior management team consisted of Garland S.
Tucker, Brent P. W. Burgess and Steven C. Lilly. Each of these
executive officers entered into employment agreements with us in
2007 for two-year terms, and each executive officer was
compensated according to the terms of such agreements, which are
described herein. We refer to these three officers in 2008 as
our named executive officers, or NEOs.
Our executive compensation program is designed to encourage our
executive officers to think and act like stockholders of the
Company. The structure of the NEOs employment agreements
and our incentive compensation programs were designed to
encourage and reward the following:
|
|
|
|
|
sourcing and pursuing attractively priced investment
opportunities in all types of securities of lower middle market
privately-held companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
participating in comprehensive due diligence with respect to our
investments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
ensuring we allocate capital in the most effective manner
possible; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
working efficiently and developing relationships with other
professionals.
|
Our compensation committee reviewed and approved all of our
compensation policies for 2008.
We completed our initial public offering, or IPO, in February
2007. As our first two years of operation as a publicly traded
business development company, or BDC, 2007 and 2008 represented
a period of constant development and growth for us, and we
worked to create an executive compensation program that would
effectively achieve our desired objectives stated above. We
intend to continue the process of aligning executive
compensation and our goals in 2009.
As a BDC, we must comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes certain limitations on the structure of our
compensation programs, including limitations on our ability to
issue certain equity-based compensation to our employees and
directors. In 2008, we received an exemptive order from the SEC
which permits us to issue restricted share awards as part of the
compensation packages for our employees and directors. In 2008,
we revised our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan in accordance with the
SECs comments. Our Board has approved the Triangle Capital
Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or
the Amended and Restated Plan, and our stockholders voted to
approve the Amended and Restated Plan at our 2008 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
Executive
Compensation Policy
In 2008, we compensated our NEOs through a combination of base
salary, cash bonuses and restricted stock awards. Our
integration of restricted stock awards into our overall
compensation philosophy is designed to make us competitive with
comparable employers and to align managements incentives
with the long-term interests of our stockholders. In allocating
among these elements the compensation committee believes that
the compensation of our NEOs should be based predominately on
company and individual performance.
Overview
Our performance-driven compensation policy consists of the
following three components:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cash bonuses; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term compensation pursuant to our equity incentive plan.
|
We designed each NEOs compensation package to
appropriately reward the NEO for his contribution to the
Company. Our compensation philosophy has not historically been,
and going forward will not be, a
78
mechanical process, and our compensation committee will
continue to use its judgment and experience, working in
conjunction with our chief executive officer and an independent
compensation consultant, to determine the appropriate mix of
compensation for each individual. Cash compensation consisting
of base salary and discretionary cash bonuses tied to
achievement of performance goals set by the compensation
committee are intended to incentivize NEOs to remain with us in
their roles and work hard to achieve our goals. Stock-based
compensation in the form of restricted stock was awarded based
on individual performance expectations set by the compensation
committee.
Establishing
Compensation Levels
Role of
the Compensation Committee and Management
As set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter, our
compensation committees primary responsibility is to
evaluate the compensation of our executive officers and assure
that they are compensated effectively and in a manner consistent
with our stated compensation objectives. The compensation
committee also periodically reviews our corporate goals and
objectives relevant to executive compensation, our executive
compensation structure to ensure that it is designed to achieve
the objectives of rewarding the companys executive
officers appropriately for their contributions to corporate
growth and profitability and our other goals and objectives. At
least annually, the compensation committee will evaluate the
compensation of our executive officers and determine the amounts
and individual elements of total compensation for executive
officers consistent with our corporate goals and objectives and
will communicate to stockholders the factors and criteria on
which the executive officers compensation is based,
including the relationship of our performance to the executive
officers compensation. With respect to the compensation of
our executive officers other than the chief executive officer,
the committee works with the chief executive officer to conduct
these reviews. The committee will also periodically evaluate the
terms and administration of our annual and long-term incentive
plans, including equity compensation plans, to ensure that they
are structured and administered in a manner consistent with our
goals and objectives as to participation in such plans, target
annual incentive awards, corporate financial goals, actual
awards paid to executive officers, and total funds allocated for
payment under the compensation plans.
Assessment
of Market Data
To assess the competitiveness of our executive compensation
levels, we developed a comparative group of internally managed
BDCs and performed comprehensive analyses of competitive
performance and compensation levels. This comparative group
included the following: Capital Southwest Corporation; Hercules
Technology Growth Capital, Inc.; Kohlberg Capital Corporation;
Main Street Capital Corporation; MCG Capital Corporation;
Medallion Financial Corp.; Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.; and
Utek Corporation.
Our analysis centered around key elements of compensation
practices within the BDC industry in general and, more
specifically, compensation practices at internally managed BDCs
closer in asset size, typical investment size, typical
investment type, market capitalization, and general business
scope to our Company. Items we reviewed included, but were not
necessarily limited to, base compensation, bonus compensation
and restricted stock awards. In addition to actual levels of
compensation, we also analyzed the approach other BDCs were
taking with regard to their compensation practices. Items we
reviewed included, but were not necessarily limited to, the use
of employment agreements for certain employees, the targeted mix
of cash and equity compensation, the use of a third party
compensation consultant, and certain corporate and executive
performance measures established to achieve total returns for
stockholders.
Using the above data, we ranked below the median of the
comparative group in market capitalization, below the median in
net income, and in the lower quartile in assets and number of
employees. Although each of the comparative companies is not
exactly comparable in size, scope and operations, the
compensation committee believes that they were the most relevant
comparable companies available with disclosed executive
compensation data, and they provide a good representation of
competitive compensation levels for our executives.
79
Assessment
of Company Performance
We believe that the alignment of (i) a companys
business plan, (ii) its stockholders expectations and
(iii) its employee compensation is essential to long term
business success in the interest of our stockholders and
employees. We typically make three to seven year investments in
privately held businesses. Our business plan involves taking on
investment risk over an extended period of time, and a premium
is placed on our ability to maintain stability of net asset
values and continuity of earnings to pass through to
stockholders in the form of recurring dividends. Our strategy is
to generate income and capital gains from our portfolio of
investments in the debt and equity securities of our customers.
This income supports the payment of dividends to our
stockholders. Therefore, a key element of our return to
stockholders is in the form of current income through the
payment of dividends. This recurring payout requires a
methodical asset acquisition approach and active monitoring and
management of our investment portfolio over time. A meaningful
part of our employee base is dedicated to the maintenance of
asset values and expansion of this recurring revenue to support
and grow dividends.
Compensation
Determination
We analyzed the competitiveness of the previously described
components of compensation individually, as well as in total, in
conjunction with our peer group of BDCs listed above. Our
comparative analysis indicated that in aggregate, for 2008, our
base salaries plus target bonuses resulted in total annual cash
compensation below the market median. We believe this is
primarily due to the fact that the Company is smaller than the
other BDCs in our peer group. As the Company grows and matures
we would expect our compensation levels would, over time, more
closely approximate the median of our peer group.
Classes
of Executive Compensation
Base
salary
Base salary is used to recognize particularly the experience,
skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of the executive
officers in their roles. In establishing the 2008 base salaries
of the NEOs, the compensation committee and management
considered a number of factors including the seniority of the
individual, the functional role of the position, the level of
the individuals responsibility, the ability to replace the
individual and the base salary of the individual in 2007. In
addition, we considered the base salaries paid to comparably
situated executive officers in other BDCs and other competitive
market practices. Finally, we used a compensation consultant in
order to get an objective third party experts insight into
our NEOs base salaries.
The salaries of the NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis, as
well as at the time of promotion or other changes in
responsibilities. The leading factors in determining increases
in salary level are relative cost of living and competitive
pressures.
On February 21, 2007, we entered into employment agreements
with Messrs. Tucker, Burgess and Lilly, each employment
agreements term ending on February 20, 2009. In
general the agreements provided for the compensation of each
NEO, as discussed above, payments to each executive upon various
termination scenarios and contained certain restrictive
covenants on competition and solicitation of our employees and
clients. The 2008 base salaries and target bonus levels for the
three NEOs were the same as they were in 2007.
Pursuant to these agreements, each executive would have received
compensation for termination due to death or disability,
termination by us other than for cause, termination by the
executive for good reason or termination upon a change in
control. See Employment Agreements and
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in
Control for additional information regarding the material
terms of these agreements.
In February 2009, upon determination by our compensation
committee that it would be in the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders for the Company to operate without
employment agreements, we requested that our NEOs waive all
notice requirements pursuant to their employment agreements and
agree
80
not to renew them on a going-forward basis in 2009. After
consideration, Messrs. Tucker, Burgess, and Lilly agreed
with our compensation committee, voluntarily waiving their
notice rights as to the renewal of their employment agreements.
As a result, effective February 21, 2009, none of our
employees is party to an employment agreement with us.
Determination
of 2008 Annual Base Salary
The compensation committee annually reviews the base salary for
each of our executive officers and determines whether or not to
increase it in its sole discretion. Increases to base salary are
awarded to recognize levels of responsibilities and related
individual performance, and to address changes in the external
competitive market for a given position.
Mr. Tucker was paid an annual base salary of $265,000 for
2008. Mr. Tuckers base salary did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Tuckers base salary recognizes his
overall responsibility for the Company and his continued
leadership which enabled us to achieve the majority of our
operational and financial objectives in 2008.
Mr. Burgess was paid an annual base salary of $240,000 for
2008. Mr. Burgess base salary did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Burgess base salary recognizes his
lead role in managing all investment activity of the Company,
including marketing, structuring, closing and monitoring
portfolio company investments.
Mr. Lilly was paid an annual base salary of $240,000 for
2008. Mr. Lillys base salary did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Lillys base salary recognizes his
lead role in managing all financial and administrative aspects
of our Company, as well as his leadership in matters relating to
our capital structure, the media and investor relations.
Mr. Lillys base salary also reflected his service as
our Companys Chief Compliance Officer.
Annual
Cash Bonuses
We pay annual cash bonuses to reward corporate and individual
achievements for the prior fiscal year. We determined that
annual cash bonuses will be based on the compensation
committees discretionary assessment of the Companys
and the NEOs performance, with recommendations from the
chief executive officer for NEOs other than himself. For 2008,
NEOs were eligible for cash bonuses, ranging from 0% to 100% of
their highest annual rate of base salary. Performance
achievements which were considered in the determination of cash
bonuses for fiscal 2008 include individual performance and
Company performance (based upon a comparison of actual
performance to budgeted performance).
Determination
of Annual Cash Bonuses
Cash bonuses for 2008 were paid in February of 2009 and were
typically determined as a percentage of each employees
salary, based on individual performance and each employees
level within the Company. Our NEOs annual cash bonuses
paid for performance in 2008 are disclosed in the bonus column
of the Summary Compensation Table. All of our NEOs cash
bonuses earned during 2008 were determined based on performance
goals adopted by the compensation committee. The potential bonus
ranges for each of our NEOs are presented below, as well as the
actual percentage of bonuses paid as compared to salary paid in
2008 for each of our NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
Highest
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
% of 2008 Salary
|
|
NEO
|
|
% of 2008 Salary
|
|
|
% of 2008 Salary
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
All of our NEOs cash bonuses for 2008 were determined
based on the compensation committees analysis of certain
individual performance-based elements including how efficiently
capital was deployed and
81
the establishment of meaningful operational policies and
procedures, including but not limited to, portfolio valuation,
portfolio monitoring processes, asset management processes,
transaction monitoring processes and maintaining appropriate
dividend payouts to stockholders.
Mr. Tucker was paid an annual cash bonus of $265,000 for
2008. Mr. Tuckers cash bonus did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Tuckers cash bonus reflects his
overall responsibility for the Company and his continued
leadership in 2008, which enabled us to achieve the majority of
our operational and financial objectives.
Mr. Burgess was paid an annual cash bonus of $240,000 for
2008. Mr. Burgess cash bonus did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Burgess cash bonus reflects his
ability to manage the Companys investment process,
including sourcing new investments and guiding all of the
investments we made during 2008 to a successful closing on terms
we believe will be favorable to the Company. Mr. Burgess
also took a lead role in the portfolio monitoring process and
other asset management processes during 2008.
Mr. Lilly was paid an annual cash bonus of $240,000 for
2008. Mr. Lillys cash bonus did not increase from
2007 to 2008. Mr. Lillys cash bonus reflects his lead
role in the financial and administrative management of our
Company as well as his leadership in matters relating to our
capital structure, the media and investor relations.
Mr. Lilly was instrumental in implementing, in conjunction
with our principal accounting officer, our Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance procedures. Mr. Lillys cash bonus also
reflected his service as our Chief Compliance Officer during
2008.
Long
Term Incentive Compensation
General
Our Board of Directors has adopted the Amended and Restated Plan
to provide stock-based awards as incentive compensation to our
employees and non-employee directors.
We use stock-based awards to (i) attract and retain key
employees, (ii) motivate our employees by means of
performance-related incentives to achieve long-range performance
goals, (iii) enable our employees to participate in our
long-term growth and (iv) link our employees
compensation to the long-term interests of our stockholders. The
compensation committee has been delegated exclusive authority by
our Board of Directors to select the persons to receive
stock-based awards. At the time of each award granted to each
NEO, the compensation committee determines the terms of the
award in its sole discretion, including their performance period
(or periods) and the performance objectives relating to the
award.
Options
Our compensation committee may in its sole discretion (upon
delegation by the Board) grant our employees options to purchase
our common stock (including incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options). We expect that, if granted,
options will represent a fixed number of shares of our common
stock, will have an exercise, or strike, price equal to the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of such grant, and
will be exercisable, or vested, at some later time
after grant. Upon any stock option grant, its exercise price
will not be changed absent specific SEC approval that we may do
so. The fair market value will be defined as either
(i) the closing sales price of the our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market, or any other such exchange on which the
shares are traded, on such date, (ii) in the absence of
reported sales on such date, the closing sales price on the
immediately preceding date on which sales were reported or
(iii) in the event there is no public market for the shares
on such date, the fair market value as determined, in good
faith, by our Board in its sole discretion (which will in no
event will be less than the net asset value of such shares of
common stock on such date), and for purposes of a sale of a
share of common stock as of any date, the actual sales price on
that date. Some stock options granted by our compensation
committee may vest simply by the holder remaining with the
Company for a period of time, and some may vest based on meeting
certain performance goals. We anticipate that our options will
be valued for financial reporting purposes using the Black
Scholes valuation method, and charges to earnings will be taken
over the relevant service period pursuant to FASB Statement
No. 123R.
82
Specific performance factors that the compensation committee may
consider in determining the vesting of options may include
individual employee performance objectives such as work ethic,
business development, proficiency and overall contribution to
the Company. We did not grant any stock options to our employees
in 2008.
Restricted
Stock
Generally BDCs, such as us, may not grant shares of their stock
for services without an exemptive order from the SEC. In 2007,
we filed a request with the SEC for exemptive relief with
respect to our ability to issue restricted stock to our
employees and non-employee directors. On February 6, 2008,
the Board voted to approve the Triangle Capital Corporation
Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Amended
and Restated Plan, and to recommend approval of the Amended and
Restated Plan by stockholders, subject to an order from the SEC
granting exemptive relief. On March 18, 2008, we received
an order from the SEC authorizing such issuance of restricted
stock to our employees and non-employee directors, subject to
certain restrictions. As such, we were able to begin the
implementation of our long-term compensation strategies through
granting restricted stock to our non-employee directors, NEOs
and other key employees in 2008.
The Amended and Restated Plan allows our Board (and compensation
committee, after delegation of administrative duties) to grant
shares of restricted stock to our employees. Each restricted
stock award is for a fixed number of shares as set forth in an
award agreement between the grantee and us. Award agreements set
forth time
and/or
performance vesting schedules and other appropriate terms
and/or
restrictions with respect to awards, including rights to
dividends and voting rights.
Determination
of Restricted Stock Awards
Specific performance factors that the compensation committee
considered in determining the granting of restricted stock in
2008 included individual employee performance objectives such as
work ethic, proficiency and overall contribution to the Company
throughout our initial public offering process and during our
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Mr. Tucker was awarded 22,054 shares of restricted
stock in 2008. This award reflects Mr. Tuckers
leadership during 2007, including his involvement with our
initial public offering. Mr. Tuckers leadership
enabled us to achieve the majority of our operational and
financial objectives as well as his guidance in successfully
deploying our capital received from our initial public offering.
Mr. Tuckers performance during this time period was
vital to our Companys success.
Mr. Burgess was awarded 19,973 shares of restricted
stock in 2008. This award reflects Mr. Burgess
leadership in implementing our investment strategy. During 2007,
Mr. Burgess expanded our investment team, sourced certain
portfolio investments and guided each investment through our
internal investment process from inception to closing.
Mr. Lilly was awarded 19,973 shares of restricted
stock in 2008. This award reflects Mr. Lillys role in
our initial public offering process, as well as his role in
creating and implementing the operational processes we utilize
to manage our company in an efficient manner.
Mr. Lillys restricted stock awards also reflected his
service as our Chief Compliance Officer during 2007.
Change
in Control and Severance
Change in
Control
Upon termination of employment after a change of control, the
NEOs would have received severance payments pursuant to their
employment agreements entered into in connection with our IPO.
Effective February 20, 2009, however, our NEOs voluntarily
waived their rights to the renewal of their employment
agreements. As a result, effective February 21, 2009, none
of our NEOs is eligible to receive severance upon a change of
control.
83
Upon specified covered transactions involving a change of
control (as defined in the Amended and Restated Plan), all
outstanding awards under the Amended and Restated Plan will
either be assumed or substituted for by the surviving entity. If
the surviving entity does not assume or substitute similar
awards, the awards held by the participants will be accelerated
in full and then terminated to the extent not exercised prior to
the covered transaction.
Severance
Under specified covered transactions involving a change in
control (as defined in each NEOs employment agreement), if
an NEO had terminated his employment with us within two years
following such change in control, or if we had terminated or
given the NEO notice of non-renewal of the NEOs employment
within the two years commencing with a change in control, he
would have received a severance package beginning on the date of
termination. The severance package would have included monthly
payments equal to one-twelfth of (i) the NEOs annual
salary at that time plus (ii) the NEOs bonus
compensation as described in the employment agreement, and
(iii) the Company would have continued to provide the NEO
with all of the benefits provided to him immediately prior to
the termination, as described in the employment agreement. The
severance package would have continued to be in effect for
thirty-six months. In the event that an NEOs severance pay
had been triggered under his employment agreement, he would have
continued to receive his respective severance package even if he
had been hired by another employer, including a competing
business development company or other fund; however, the
Companys obligation to continue the NEOs
then-existing benefits under the severance package would have
terminated on the date the NEO became eligible to receive such
equal benefit from another employer.
In addition, a separate severance package existed in the event
the NEOs employment had been terminated as a result of
death or disability, or in the event that the Company had
terminated the NEOs employment outside of the two-year
period after a specified covered transaction involving a change
in control. The same severance package referenced in the
immediately preceding paragraph would have been provided to the
NEO, except that the severance package would have only continued
to be in effect for twenty-four months.
Each NEOs employment agreement also included a right to
allow the executive officer the opportunity to evaluate his
position with the Company for a one-month period beginning at
the end of one year after a change in control had occurred, in
order to determine whether at that time it would have been in
the best interests of the Company and the executive officer for
the executive officer to continue serving in his then current
position. If the NEO had been dissatisfied with his
responsibilities one year after the change in control had
occurred, he could have terminated his employment with the
Company without good reason and still would have received a
severance package. The severance package would have included
monthly payments equal to one-twelfth of (i) the NEOs
annual salary at that time plus (ii) the NEOs bonus
compensation as described in the employment agreement, and
(iii) the Company would have continued to provide the NEO
with all of the benefits provided to him immediately prior to
the termination, as described in the employment agreement. The
severance package would have continued to be in effect for
thirty-six months.
Finally, if we had failed to renew any NEOs employment
agreement outside of the two-year period after a specified
covered transaction involving a change in control (causing such
NEOs employment to terminate), any severance payment or benefit
would have been payable at the absolute discretion of the Board.
The rationale behind providing a severance package in certain
events was to attract talented executives who would be assured
that they would not be financially injured if they physically
relocated
and/or left
another job to join us but were forced out through no fault of
their own and to ensure that our business would be operated and
governed for our stockholders by a management team, and under
the direction of a Board of Directors, who were not financially
motivated to frustrate the execution of a change in control
transaction. For more discussion regarding executive
compensation in the event of a termination or change of control,
please see the table entitled 2008 Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control and accompanying
discussion.
84
Tax
and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 limits
our deduction for federal income tax purposes to not more than
$1 million of compensation paid to certain executive
officers in a calendar year. Compensation above $1 million
may be deducted if it is performance-based
compensation. Our compensation committee has not
established a policy for determining which forms of incentive
compensation awarded to our executive officers should be
designated to qualify as performance-based
compensation. To maintain flexibility in compensating our
executive officers in a manner designed to promote our
objectives, the compensation committee has not adopted a policy
that requires all compensation to be deductible. However, the
compensation committee evaluates the effects of the compensation
limits of Section 162(m) on all compensation it proposes to
grant, and the compensation committee intends to provide all
executive compensation in a manner consistent with our best
interests and those of our stockholders. In 2008, none of the
named executive officers received compensation that would exceed
the $1 million limit on deductibility.
In awarding restricted stock awards for performance in 2008, we
accounted for share-based awards under the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123(R). FAS 123(R)
establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for
goods or services. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is
measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the awards,
and is recognized as an expense ratably over the requisite
service period. Accounting rules also require us to record cash
compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is
incurred.
Conclusion
Our compensation policies are designed to fairly compensate,
retain and motivate our NEOs. The retention and motivation of
our NEOs should enable us to grow strategically and position
ourselves competitively in our market.
Executive
Officer Compensation
Due to the fact that we consummated our initial public offering
of common stock in February 2007, we did not compensate our
executive officers in 2006, and we only have executive officer
compensation data for a portion of 2007, in addition to the 2008
data. The respective compensation of our named executive
officers in 2007 and 2008 was as follows:
2008
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
|
$
|
245,020
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
60,389
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
835,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
231,875
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,277
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
515,152
|
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
|
CIO(
|
5)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
221,900
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
46,290
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
748,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,318
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
462,318
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
CFO
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
221,900
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
46,054
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
747,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
280,416
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,488
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
501,904
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Value of restricted stock awards granted during 2008. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes (i) value of benefits in the form of 401(k)
contributions, health, life and disability insurance premiums
paid by the Company in 2008 and (ii) value of dividends
received or earned in respect of each executive officers
restricted stock awards received in 2008. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes base salary paid from February 21, 2007 through
December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes value of benefits in the form of 401(k) contributions,
health, life and disability insurance premiums paid by the
Company in 2007. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
CIO stands for Chief Investment Officer. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Includes a tax
gross-up
bonus approved by the compensation committee. |
85
Equity
Incentive Plan
Our Board of Directors and sole stockholder approved
Triangles 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Original
Plan, effective February 13, 2007, for the purpose of
attracting and retaining the services of executive officers,
directors and other key employees. During our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, no equity incentive awards were granted
under the Original Plan, in part due to certain 1940 Act
restrictions which disallow the issuance of certain types of
compensation to a business development companys
non-employee directors and employees without having first
obtained exemptive relief. In 2007, we filed a request with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for such
exemptive relief with respect to our ability to issue restricted
stock to our employees and non-employee directors. On
March 18, 2008 we received an order from the SEC
authorizing such issuance of restricted stock to our employees
and non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of the Amended
and Restated Plan and as otherwise set forth in the exemptive
order. In 2008, our Board approved, and the stockholders voted
to approve, the Triangle Capital Corporation Amended and
Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Amended and Restated
Plan. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we
granted restricted share awards to our officers, directors and
key employees in accordance with the Amended and Restated Plan.
The following is a summary of the material features of the
Amended and Restated Plan. It may not contain all of the
information important to you. The Amended and Restated Plan
includes provisions allowing the issuance of restricted stock to
all key employees and directors. Restricted stock refers to an
award of stock that is subject to forfeiture restrictions and
may not be transferred until such restrictions have lapsed. The
Amended and Restated Plan will also allow us to issue options to
our key employees in the future should our Board and
compensation committee choose to do so.
Under the Amended and Restated Plan, up to 900,000 shares
of our common stock are authorized for issuance. Participants in
the Amended and Restated Plan who are employees may receive
awards of options to purchase shares of common stock or grants
of restricted stock, as determined by the Board. Participants
who are non-employee directors may receive awards of restricted
stock in accordance with certain parameters as discussed below.
The basis of such participation is to provide incentives to our
employees and directors in order to attract and retain the
services of qualified professionals.
Options granted under the Amended and Restated Plan entitle the
optionee, upon exercise, to purchase shares of common stock at a
specified exercise price per share. Options must have a per
share exercise price of no less than the fair market value of a
share of stock on the date of the grant, subject to forfeiture
provisions as determined by the Board. The exercise period of
each stock option awarded will expire on a date determined by
the Board, such date to be specified in the stock option award
agreement; however, the Plan also states that no stock option
award will be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from
the date such stock option was granted.
The Amended and Restated Plan permits the issuance of restricted
stock to employees and directors consistent with such terms and
conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate, subject to the
limitations set forth in the plan. With respect to awards issued
to our employees, the Board will determine the time or times at
which such shares of restricted stock will become exercisable
and the terms on which such shares will remain exercisable.
Shares granted pursuant to a restricted stock award will not be
transferable until such shares have vested in accordance with
the terms of the award agreement, unless the transfer is by will
or by the laws of descent and distribution.
The Amended and Restated Plan provides that our non-employee
directors each receive an automatic grant of restricted stock at
the beginning of each one-year term of service on the Board, for
which forfeiture restrictions lapse one year from the grant
date. The number of shares granted to each non-employee director
in 2008 was the equivalent of $30,000 worth of shares, taken at
the market value at the close of the Nasdaq Global Market on the
date of grant, which historically has been the date of our
annual stockholders meeting. Going forward in 2009 and beyond,
the grants of restricted stock to non-employee directors under
the Amended and Restated Plan will be automatic (that is, the
grants will equal $30,000 worth of restricted stock each year),
and the terms thereunder will not be changed without SEC
approval. Shares granted pursuant to a
86
restricted stock award will not be transferable until such
shares have vested in accordance with the terms of the award
agreement, unless the transfer is by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution.
Our Board of Directors has delegated administration of the
Amended and Restated Plan to its compensation committee,
currently comprised solely of three (3) independent
directors who are independent pursuant to the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market. Our Board may abolish
such committee at any time and revest in our Board the
administration of the Amended and Restated Plan. Our Board
administers the Amended and Restated Plan in a manner that is
consistent with the applicable requirements of the Nasdaq Global
Market and the exemptive order.
The following tables and discussions thereunder provide
information regarding the Amended and Restated Plan generally
and the restricted stock awards granted to our executive
officers in 2008:
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Amended and Restated
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
to be Issued upon
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Under Amended and
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Restated Plan
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,200
|
(2)
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,200
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Amended and Restated Plan is the only equity compensation
plan currently utilized by the Company. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The Amended and Restated Plan has an aggregate of
900,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance. |
2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Shares of Stock
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
May 7, 2008
|
|
|
22,054
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
245,020
|
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
May 7, 2008
|
|
|
19,973
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
221,900
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
May 7, 2008
|
|
|
19,973
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
221,900
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of restricted stock which vests ratably over four years
from the date of grant. |
On May 7, 2008, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation
of our compensation committee, approved grants of restricted
stock awards to the Companys non-employee directors and
executive officers as set forth above. All of these restricted
shares of stock were valued at $11.11, the closing price of our
common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on May 7, 2008,
the grant date. The restricted share awards granted to the
executive officers vest ratably over four years from this grant
date.
None of these shares of restricted stock may be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or
disposed of prior to the their vesting date, and, except as
otherwise determined by our board or compensation committee at
or after the grant of each executive officers award of
restricted stock, any of the shares which have not fully vested
will be forfeited, and all rights of the executive officer to
such shares shall terminate, without further obligation on the
part of Triangle, unless the executive officer remains employed
with us for the entire vesting period relating to the restricted
stock.
In addition, in accordance with the Amended and Restated Plan
and each individual award agreement, any share of the
Companys stock distributed with respect to the restricted
stock reflected in the table above is
87
subject to the same ratable vesting restrictions, terms and
conditions as the restricted stock awarded to each executive
officer.
For additional information regarding the restricted stock awards
granted to each of our executive officers, please refer to
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
2008
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Plan Awards: Market
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
Plan Awards: Number
|
|
|
or Payout Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares of Stock
|
|
|
Shares of Stock
|
|
|
of Unearned Shares
|
|
|
Unearned Shares
|
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Vested(1)
|
|
|
Vested(2)
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Vested(2)
|
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
22,054
|
|
|
$
|
224,730
|
|
|
|
22,054
|
|
|
$
|
224,730
|
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
|
19,973
|
|
|
$
|
203,525
|
|
|
|
19,973
|
|
|
$
|
203,525
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
19,973
|
|
|
$
|
203,525
|
|
|
|
19,973
|
|
|
$
|
203,525
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One-fourth of the shares listed will vest on May 6 of each year
until May 6, 2012, at which time all shares will be fully
vested, subject to the executive officer still being employed
with us at such vesting dates. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The values of the unvested common stock listed are based on a
$10.19 closing price of our common stock as reported on the
Nasdaq Global Market on December 31, 2008. |
Employment
Agreements
Upon consummation of our IPO, we entered into employment
agreements with Messrs. Tucker, Burgess, and Lilly that
provide for a two year term. The initial base salaries under the
employment agreements for Messrs. Tucker, Burgess, and
Lilly were $265,000, $240,000, and $240,000, respectively.
In addition, in 2008, each executive officer was eligible to
receive an annual bonus of up to a maximum of 100% of the
executive officers 2008 base salary for achieving certain
performance objectives. Our compensation committee established
such performance objectives, as well as the bonus awarded to
each executive officer, the details of which are discussed in
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above.
After recent consideration, our board of directors and
compensation committee determined that it would be in the best
interests of the Company and our stockholders if these
employment agreements were not renewed for additional one-year
terms. Accordingly, on February 20, 2009, each executive
officer affirmatively waived his non-renewal notice rights set
forth in his employment agreement, and the Company formally
acknowledged such waivers.
Effective February 21, 2009, none of the executive officers
is employed by us pursuant to an employment agreement. Rather,
each executive officer is currently employed by us on an at-will
basis. Each executive officer will continue to be paid his
respective salary set forth in his previously effective
employment agreement (as described herein) and is eligible to
receive cash bonuses and equity incentives in the discretion of
our board of directors and compensation committee.
For additional information regarding the total compensation for
each of our executive officers, please refer to our Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section above.
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Under their respective employment agreements (which, as
explained above in the section entitled Employment
Agreements, are no longer in effect as of
February 21, 2009), each NEO was entitled to certain
payments upon termination of employment or in the event of a
change in control. The following table sets
88
forth those potential payments with respect to each NEO in
2008. In providing the estimated potential payments, we have
made the following general assumptions in all circumstances
where applicable:
|
|
|
|
|
change in control event would have occurred, and the date of
termination was December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the annual salary at the time of termination would have been as
follows: Garland S. Tucker, III, $265,000; Brent P.W.
Burgess, $240,000; and Steven C. Lilly $240,000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
there would have been no unpaid bonus for the prior year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
there would have been no accrued and unpaid salary; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there would have been no unpaid reimbursement for expenses
incurred prior to the date of termination.
|
2008
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within Two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside of
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteenth
|
|
|
|
|
Two Years
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month After
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
Control;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control;
|
|
|
|
|
in Control;
|
|
w/o Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
w/o Good
|
Name
|
|
Benefit
|
|
w/o Cause(3)
|
|
Reason(4)
|
|
Death
|
|
Disability
|
|
Reason(5)
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
Severance Pay(1)
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
795,000
|
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
795,000
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
795,000
|
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
530,000
|
|
|
$
|
795,000
|
|
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
Severance Pay(1)
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
Severance Pay(1)
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Severance pay would have included an NEOs annual salary
and applicable multiple thereof paid monthly beginning at the
time of termination, plus the employees benefits in the
form of medical, health or other employee welfare benefit plan
adopted by us. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Bonus compensation would at most have been equal to 100% of an
employees annual salary, multiplied by the number of years
in which the employee would have been eligible to receive
severance pay as defined above. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Change in control was defined in each employees employment
agreement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Good Reason was defined in each employees employment
agreement. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The intent of this particular provision in each of our 2008
executive officers employment agreements was to allow the
executive officer the opportunity to evaluate his position with
the Company one year after a change in control had occurred, in
order to determine whether at that time it would have been in
the best interests of the Company and the executive officer for
the executive officer to continue serving in his then current
position. |
Under specified covered transactions involving a change in
control, if an NEO had terminated his employment with us within
two (2) years following such change in control, or if we
had terminated or given the NEO notice of non-renewal of the
NEOs employment within the two years commencing with a
change in control, he would have received a severance package
beginning on the date of termination. The severance package
would have included monthly payments equal to one-twelfth of
(i) the NEOs annual salary at that time plus
(ii) the NEOs bonus compensation as described in the
employment agreement, and (iii) the Company would have
continued to provide the NEO with all of the benefits provided
to him immediately prior to the termination, as described in the
employment agreement. The severance package would have continued
to be in effect for thirty-six months.
89
In addition, a separate severance package existed in the event
the NEOs employment had been terminated as a result of
death or disability, or in the event that the Company had
terminated the NEOs employment outside of the two-year
period after a specified covered transaction involving a change
in control. The same severance package referenced in the
immediately preceding paragraph would have been provided to the
NEO, except that the severance package would have only continued
to be in effect for twenty-four months.
Each NEOs employment agreement also included a right to
allow the executive officer the opportunity to evaluate his
position with the Company for a one-month period beginning at
the end of one year after a change in control had occurred, in
order to determine whether at that time it would have been in
the best interests of the Company and the NEO for the NEO to
continue serving in his then current position. If the NEO had
been dissatisfied with his responsibilities under the management
after the change in control had occurred, he could have
terminated his employment with the Company without good reason
and still would have received a severance package. The severance
package would have included monthly payments equal to
one-twelfth of (i) the NEOs annual salary at that
time plus (ii) the NEOs bonus compensation as
described in the employment agreement, and (iii) the
Company would have continued to provide the NEO with all of the
benefits provided to him immediately prior to the termination,
as described in the employment agreement. The severance package
would have continued to be in effect for thirty-six months.
Finally, if we had failed to renew any NEOs employment
agreement outside of the two-year period after a specified
covered transaction involving a change in control (thereby
terminating such NEOs employment with us), any severance
payment or benefit would have been payable at the absolute
discretion of the Board.
In addition to severance compensation, each NEOs
employment agreement provided noncompetition, nonsolicitation,
non-interference and confidentiality covenants in the event an
NEOs employment had been terminated. Under the applicable
employment agreements, for a period of two years after an
NEOs employment with Triangle terminated for any reason
whatsoever, the NEO would have been prohibited from competing
with our Company, soliciting our employees and interfering with
our business relationships. Further, each executive officer was
required to keep confidential, whether during or after
employment, all of our Companys confidential
information, as such term was defined in each employment
agreement.
After recent consideration, our board of directors and
compensation committee determined that it would be in the best
interests of the Company and our stockholders if these
employment agreements were not renewed for additional one-year
terms; however, we had not given any of our executive officers
the requisite three-month notice in accordance with the terms of
their employment agreements. To that end, Messrs. Tucker,
Burgess and Lilly were in agreement with us that non-renewal of
their employment agreements is desirable, and accordingly, on
February 20, 2009, each executive officer affirmatively
waived his non-renewal notice rights set forth in his employment
agreement, and we formally acknowledged such waivers.
Effective February 21, 2009, none of the executive officers
is employed by us pursuant to an employment agreement. Rather,
each executive officer is currently employed by us on an at-will
basis. Each executive officer will continue to be paid his
respective salary set forth in his previously effective
employment agreement (as described above) and is eligible to
receive cash bonuses and equity incentives in the discretion of
our board of directors and compensation committee.
401(k)
Plan
In 2008, we maintained a 401(k) plan in which all full-time
employees who were at least 21 years of age were eligible
to participate. Only full-time employees who are at least
21 years of age and have 90 days of service are
eligible to participate and receive certain employer
contributions. Eligible employees have the opportunity to
contribute their compensation on a pretax salary basis into the
401(k) plan up to $15,500 for the plan year, and to direct the
investment of these contributions. Plan participants who reach
the age of 50 prior to or during the plan year are eligible to
defer up to an additional $5,000 for the plan year.
90
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
Effective concurrently with the closing of our initial public
offering, Triangle Mezzanine LLC, the general partner of
Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP, merged into a wholly owned
subsidiary of Triangle Capital Corporation. A substantial
majority of the ownership interests of Triangle Mezzanine LLC
were owned by certain of our executive officers (Garland S.
Tucker, III, Brent P.W. Burgess, Steven C. Lilly, Tarlton
H. Long and David F. Parker). As a result of such merger,
Messrs. Tucker, Burgess, Lilly, Long and Parker
collectively received shares of our common stock valued at
approximately $6.7 million.
Prior to the closing of our IPO, certain employees
(Messrs. Tucker, Long and Parker) collectively owned
approximately 67% of Triangle Capital Partners, LLC, an entity
which provided management and advisory services to Triangle
Mezzanine Fund LLLP pursuant to a management services
agreement dated as of February 3, 2003. Under the terms of
that management services agreement, Triangle Capital Partners,
LLC received $0.2 million in management fees from Triangle
Mezzanine Fund LLLP during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007. This agreement was terminated upon the
closing of our initial public offering.
For additional information regarding the amount of common stock
owned by members of management, see Control Persons and
Principal Stockholders below.
91
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 7,
2009, by each of our executive officers and independent
directors and all of our directors and executive officers as a
group. As of April 7, 2009, we are not aware of any 5%
beneficial owners of our common stock, nor are we aware of any
person who controls us, control being defined as the
beneficial ownership of more than 25% of our common stock.
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with
rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act. There is no common stock subject to options
or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days of April 7, 2009. Percentage of beneficial
ownership is based on 7,047,663 shares of common stock
outstanding as of April 7, 2009. The business address of
each person below is 3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned by
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
of Class
|
|
|
Directors(1)
|
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
172,300
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Brent P. W. Burgess
|
|
|
159,390
|
(3)
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Steven C. Lilly
|
|
|
136,375
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Independent Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. McComb Dunwoody
|
|
|
154,143
|
(5)
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Benjamin S. Goldstein
|
|
|
10,219
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Simon B. Rich, Jr.
|
|
|
24,063
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
Sherwood H. Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
48,879
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors and Officers as a Group
|
|
|
705,369
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
over $
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are:
none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000,
or over $100,000. The dollar ranges are based on the price of
our common stock on April 7, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes 51,236 shares of restricted stock that vest
ratably over four years. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes 43,609 shares of restricted stock that vest
ratably over four years. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes 41,064 shares of restricted stock that vest
ratably over four years. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Includes 3,064 shares of restricted stock that become fully
vested on May 7, 2009. |
92
SALES OF
COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2008,
our stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited
number of shares of our common stock at any level of discount
from net asset value (NAV) per share during the one year period
following such approval. In order to sell shares pursuant to
this authorization a majority of our directors who have no
financial interest in the sale and a majority of our independent
directors must (a) find that the sale is in our best
interests and in the best interests of our stockholders, and
(b) in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of
the offering, make a good faith determination as of a time
either immediately prior to the first solicitation by us or on
our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such shares, or
immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price
at which such shares are to be sold is not less than a price
which closely approximates the market value of such shares, less
any distributing commission or discount. Any offering of common
stock below NAV per share will be designed to raise capital for
investment in accordance with our investment objective.
In making a determination that an offering below NAV per share
is in our and our stockholders best interests, our Board
of Directors would consider a variety of factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
The effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on
our stockholders, including the potential dilution they would
experience as a result of the offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount per share by which the offering price per share and
the net proceeds per share are less than the most recently
determined NAV per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to
NAV per share and the potential impact of the offering on the
market price per share of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the estimated offering price would closely approximate
the market value of our shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The potential market impact of being able to raise capital
during the current financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in
the offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and
availability of investments; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The leverage available to us.
|
We will not sell shares under a prospectus supplement to the
post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which
this prospectus forms a part (the current amendment)
if the cumulative dilution to the Companys NAV per share
from offerings under the current amendment exceeds 15%. This
would be measured separately for each offering pursuant to the
current amendment by calculating the percentage dilution or
accretion to aggregate NAV from that offering and then summing
the percentage from each offering. For example, if our most
recently determined NAV at the time of the first offering is
$15.00 and we have 30 million shares outstanding, sale of
6 million shares at net proceeds to us of $7.50 per share
(a 50% discount) would produce dilution of 8.33%. If we
subsequently determined that our NAV per share increased to
$15.75 on the then 36 million shares outstanding and then
made an additional offering, we could, for example, sell
approximately an additional 7.2 million shares at net
proceeds to us of $9.45 per share, which would produce dilution
of 6.67%, before we would reach the aggregate 15% limit. If we
file a new post-effective amendment, the threshold would reset.
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose
potential risks for our existing stockholders whether or not
they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors
who participate in the offering.
The following three headings and accompanying tables will
explain and provide hypothetical examples on the impact of an
offering at a price less than NAV per share on three different
set of investors:
|
|
|
|
|
existing stockholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
existing stockholders who purchase a relative small amount of
shares in the offering or a relatively large amount of shares in
the offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
new investors who become stockholders by purchasing shares in
the offering.
|
93
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering
below Net Asset Value or NAV per share or who do not
buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or
lower price we obtain in the offering (after expenses and
commissions) face the greatest potential risks. These
stockholders will experience an immediate decrease (often called
dilution) in the NAV of the shares they hold and their NAV per
share. These stockholders will also experience a
disproportionately greater decrease in their participation in
our earnings and assets and their voting power than the increase
we will experience in our assets, potential earning power and
voting interests due to the offering. These stockholders may
also experience a decline in the market price of their shares,
which often reflects to some degree announced or potential
increases and decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be
more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of
discounts increases.
The following table illustrates the level of NAV dilution that
would be experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in three
different hypothetical offerings of different sizes and levels
of discount from NAV per share. It is not possible to predict
the level of market price decline that may occur. Actual sales
prices and discounts may differ from the presentation below.
The examples assume that Company XYZ has 1,000,000 common shares
outstanding, $15,000,000 in total assets and $5,000,000 in total
liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus
$10,000,000 and $10.00. The table illustrates the dilutive
effect on nonparticipating Stockholder A of (1) an offering
of 50,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.50
per share after offering expenses and commission (a 5% discount
from NAV), (2) an offering of 100,000 shares (10% of
the outstanding shares) at $9.00 per share after offering
expenses and commissions (a 10% discount from NAV) and
(3) an offering of 200,000 shares (20% of the
outstanding shares) at $8.00 per share after offering expenses
and commissions (a 20% discount from NAV).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution to Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
|
(4.76
|
)%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
(9.09
|
)%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
(16.67
|
)%
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
99,762
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
99,091
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
96,667
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.00 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00
per Share)
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in an offering below
NAV per share or who buy additional shares in the secondary
market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering
(after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types
of NAV dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at
a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the same
percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in our
shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of NAV
dilution will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders
purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than such
percentage will experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to
existing stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate
share of the offering, experience an increase (often called
accretion) in NAV per share over their investment per share and
will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in
their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting
power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and
voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion
will increase as the excess number of shares such stockholder
purchases increases. Even a stockholder who overparticipates
will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does
not participate, in which case such a stockholder will
experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent
offerings. These stockholders may also experience a decline in
the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some
degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per
share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the
offering and the level of discounts increases.
The following table illustrates the level of dilution and
accretion in the hypothetical 20% discount offering from the
prior table (Example 3) for a stockholder that acquires
shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of the
offering (i.e., 1,000 shares, which is 0.5% of an offering
of 200,000 shares) rather than its 1.0% proportionate share
and (2) 150% of such percentage (i.e. 3,000 shares,
which is 1.5% of an offering of 200,000 shares rather than
its 1.0% proportionate share). The prospectus supplement
pursuant to which any discounted offering is made will include a
table for these examples based on the actual number of shares in
such offering and the actual discount from the most recently
determined NAV per share. It is not
95
possible to predict the level of market price decline that may
occur. Actual sales prices and discounts may differ from the
presentation below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% Participation
|
|
|
150% Participation
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
(8.33
|
)%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
106,333
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
125,667
|
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.00 per
Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
108,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A Investment per Share Held by
Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Assumed to be $10.00 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/ Accretion per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per
Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Dilution/
Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.93
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Impact On
New Investors
Investors who are not currently stockholders and who participate
in an offering below NAV but whose investment per share is
greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling
compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. Investors who are not currently stockholders and who
participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose
investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per
share due to selling compensation and expenses paid by the
issuer being significantly less than the discount per share will
experience an immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately
greater participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning
power and voting interests. These investors will, however, be
subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as
described above in such subsequent offerings. These investors
may also experience a decline in the market price of their
shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
96
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The following table illustrates the level of dilution or
accretion for new investors that would be experienced by a new
investor in the same hypothetical 5%, 10% and 20% discounted
offerings as described in the first table above. The
illustration is for a new investor who purchases the same
percentage (1.0%) of the shares in the offering as Stockholder A
in the prior examples held immediately prior to the offering.
The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted
offering is made will include a table for these examples based
on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual
discount from the most recently determined NAV per share. It is
not possible to predict the level of market price decline that
may occur. Actual sales prices and discounts may differ from the
presentation below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/ Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less
Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/ Accretion per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per Share
Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/ Accretion to Investor A (Dilution per Share
Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.79
|
%
|
97
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for
reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders,
unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below.
As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we
declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will
have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional
shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash
dividends.
No action will be required on the part of a registered
stockholder to have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of
our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive
an entire dividend in cash by notifying The Bank of New York
Mellon, the Plan Administrator and our transfer
agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is received
by the plan administrator no later than the record date for
dividends to stockholders. The plan administrator will set up an
account for shares acquired through the plan for each
stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends in cash and
hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in the plan, received in writing not
less than three days prior to the payment date fixed by the
Board of Directors, the plan administrator will, instead of
crediting shares to the participants account, issue a
certificate registered in the participants name for the
number of whole shares of our common stock and a check for any
fractional share. Those stockholders whose shares are held by a
broker or other financial intermediary may receive dividends in
cash by notifying their broker or other financial intermediary
of their election.
We intend to use primarily newly issued shares to implement the
plan, so long as our shares are trading at or above net asset
value. If our shares are trading below net asset value, we
intend to purchase shares in the open market in connection with
our implementation of the plan. If we use newly issued shares to
implement the plan, the number of shares to be issued to a
stockholder is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of
the dividend payable to such stockholder by the market price per
share of our common stock at the close of regular trading on the
Nasdaq Global Market on the dividend payment date. Market price
per share on that date will be the closing price for such shares
on the Nasdaq Global Market or, if no sale is reported for such
day, at the average of their reported bid and asked prices. If
we purchase shares in the open market to implement the plan, the
number of shares to be issued to a stockholder is determined by
dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to such
stockholder by the average price per share for all shares
purchased by the Plan Administrator in the open market in
connection with the dividend. The number of shares of our common
stock to be outstanding after giving effect to payment of the
dividend cannot be established until the value per share at
which additional shares will be issued has been determined and
elections of our stockholders have been tabulated.
There will be no brokerage charges or other charges to
stockholders who participate in the plan. We will pay the plan
administrators fees under the plan. If a participant
elects by written notice to the plan administrator to have the
plan administrator sell part or all of the shares held by the
plan administrator in the participants account and remit
the proceeds to the participant, the plan administrator is
authorized to deduct a $15.00 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per
share brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock
generally are subject to the same federal, state and local tax
consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
dividends in cash. A stockholders basis for determining
gain or loss upon the sale of stock received in a dividend from
us will be equal to the total dollar amount of the dividend
payable to the stockholder. Any stock received in a dividend
will have a holding period for tax purposes commencing on the
day following the day on which the shares are credited to the
U.S. stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by
notifying the plan administrator via its website at
https://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd, by filling out the
transaction request form located at the bottom of their
statement and sending it to the plan administrator at BNY Mellon
Shareowner Services, P.O. Box 358035, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
15252-8015,
or by calling the plan administrator at
(866) 228-7201.
We may terminate the plan upon notice in writing mailed to each
participant at least 30 days prior to any record date for
the payment of any dividend by us. All correspondence concerning
the plan should be directed to the plan administrator by mail at
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, P.O. Box 358035,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15252-8015.
98
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR SECURITIES
The following description is based on relevant portions of
the Maryland General Corporation Law and on our articles of
incorporation and bylaws. This summary may not contain all of
the information that is important to you, and we refer you to
the Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of
incorporation and bylaws for a more detailed description of the
provisions summarized below.
Capital
Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 150,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which
6,917,363 shares were outstanding as of December 31,
2008. Under our articles of incorporation, our board of
directors is authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued
shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, and to
cause the issuance of such shares, without obtaining stockholder
approval. In addition, as permitted by the Maryland General
Corporation Law, but subject to the 1940 Act, our articles of
incorporation provide that the board of directors, without any
action by our stockholders, may amend the articles of
incorporation from time to time to increase or decrease the
aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of
stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue.
Under Maryland law, our stockholders generally are not
personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Common
Stock
All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings,
assets, dividends and voting privileges, except as described
below, and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized,
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may
be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when
authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of
assets legally available therefor. Shares of our common stock
have no conversion, exchange, preemptive or redemption rights.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
company, each share of our common stock would be entitled to
share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available
for distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities
and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our
preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such
time. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on
all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the
election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any
other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock
will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative
voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of
a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock will elect
all of our directors, and holders of less than a majority of
such shares will be unable to elect any director.
Preferred
Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors
to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into
other classes or series of stock, including preferred stock.
Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series, the board
of directors is required by Maryland law and by our articles of
incorporation to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other
rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends
or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions
of redemption for each class or series. Thus, the board of
directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred
stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in
control that might involve a premium price for holders of our
common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should
note, however, that any issuance of preferred stock must comply
with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires,
among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and
before any dividend or other distribution is made with respect
to our common stock and before any purchase of common stock is
made, such preferred stock together with all other senior
securities must not exceed an amount equal to 50.0% of our total
assets after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution
or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders
of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be
entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred
stock are in arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under
the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any
issued and outstanding preferred stock. We believe that the
availability for issuance of preferred stock will provide us
with increased flexibility in structuring future financings and
acquisitions.
99
Long-Term
Debt
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a maturity of ten years,
require semi-annual payments of interest, do not require any
principal payments prior to maturity, and, historically, were
subject to certain prepayment penalties. Those prepayment
penalties no longer apply as of September 2006. As of
December 31, 2008, we (through Triangle SBIC) had issued
$115.1 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, which had an
annual weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.8%.
With $65.3 million of regulatory capital as of
December 31, 2008, we have the current capacity to issue up
to a total of $130.6 million of SBA guaranteed debentures.
Outstanding
Securities
Set forth below are our outstanding classes of securities as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount held by
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Company
|
|
Amount
|
Title of Class
|
|
Authorized
|
|
or for its Account
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
SBA-Guaranteed Debentures
|
|
$
|
130,600,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,110,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on $65.3 million of regulatory capital as of
December 31, 2008. For more information regarding our
limitations as to SBA guaranteed debenture issuances, see
Regulation Small Business Administration
Regulation below. |
Limitation
on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and
Advance of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
articles of incorporation a provision limiting the liability of
its directors and officers to the corporation and its
stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting
from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in
money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate
dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to
the cause of action. Our articles of incorporation contain such
a provision that eliminates directors and officers
liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law,
subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our articles of incorporation authorize us, to the maximum
extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements
of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or
officer or any individual who, while a director or officer and
at our request, serves or has served another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee,
from and against any claim or liability to which such person may
become subject or which such person may incur by reason of his
or her service in any such capacity.
Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any
individual who, while a director or officer and at our request,
serves or has served another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a
director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or
threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by reason of
his or her service in any such capacity from and against any
claim or liability to which that person may become subject or
which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in
any such capacity. Our bylaws also provide that, to the maximum
extent permitted by Maryland law, with the approval of our board
of directors and provided that certain conditions described in
our bylaws are met, we may pay certain expenses incurred by any
such indemnified person in advance of the final disposition of a
proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of
such indemnified person to repay amounts we have so paid if it
is ultimately determined that indemnification of such expenses
is not authorized under our bylaws.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its articles of
incorporation provide otherwise, which our articles of
incorporation do not) to indemnify a director or officer who has
been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or
she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his
or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a
corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and
officers,
100
among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements
and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection
with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to
be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other
capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or
omission of the director or officer was material to the matter
giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad
faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received
an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or
(c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or
officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland
corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit
by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly
received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification,
and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a
corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or
officer upon the corporations receipt of (a) a
written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a
written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to
repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is
ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
We have purchased directors and officers insurance
policies covering our directors and officers and us for any acts
and omissions committed, attempted or allegedly committed by any
director or officer during the policy period. The policy is
subject to customary exclusions.
Provisions
of The Maryland General Corporation Law and Articles of
Incorporation And Bylaws
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of
incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it
more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us by means
of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions
are expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices
and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to
acquire control of us to negotiate first with our board of
directors. We believe that the benefits of these provisions
outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such
acquisition proposals because, among other things, the
negotiation of such proposals may improve their terms.
Director
Terms; Election of Directors
Our articles of incorporation provide that the term of each
director is one year unless and until the board of directors,
acting by authority provided under
Section 3-802
of the Maryland General Corporation Law, establishes staggered
terms in the manner provided in
Section 3-803
of the Maryland General Corporation Law. Our bylaws currently
provide that directors are elected by a plurality of the votes
cast in the election of directors. Pursuant to our articles of
incorporation and bylaws, our board of directors may amend the
bylaws to alter the vote required to elect directors.
Number
of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our articles of incorporation provide that the number of
directors will be set only by the board of directors in
accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority
of our entire board of directors may at any time increase or
decrease the number of directors. However, unless the bylaws are
amended, the number of directors may never be less than one nor
more than 12. We have elected to be subject to the provision of
Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General Corporation
Law regarding the filling of vacancies on the board of
directors. Accordingly, at such time, except as may be provided
by the board of directors in setting the terms of any class or
series of preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the board of
directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the
remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director
elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the
full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and
until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any
applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. Our articles of
incorporation provide that a director may be removed only for
cause, as defined in the articles of incorporation, and then
only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
101
Action
by Stockholders
Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, stockholder action
may be taken only at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders or by unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting
(unless the articles of incorporation provide for stockholder
action by less than unanimous written consent, which our
articles of incorporation permit only with respect to actions
recommended by the board of directors). These provisions,
combined with the requirements of our bylaws regarding the
calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of
stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying
consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual
meeting.
Advance
Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder
Proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the board
of directors and the proposal of business to be considered by
stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by the board of directors or (3) by a
stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has
complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With
respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business
specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the
meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the board of
directors at a special meeting may be made only
(1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the
board of directors or (3) provided that the board of
directors has determined that directors will be elected at the
meeting, by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting
and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the
bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice
of nominations and other business is to afford our board of
directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the
qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of
any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary
or desirable by our board of directors, to inform stockholders
and make recommendations about such qualifications or business,
as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting
meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our
board of directors any power to disapprove stockholder
nominations for the election of directors or proposals
recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the
consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are
not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of
directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to
whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be
harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling
of Special Meeting of Stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be
called by our board of directors and certain of our officers.
Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the
satisfaction of certain procedural and informational
requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a
special meeting of stockholders shall be called by our secretary
upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not
less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast at
such meeting.
Approval
of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its articles of incorporation, merge, sell all
or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange
or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of
business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of
stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland
corporation may provide in its articles of incorporation for
approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less
than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Our articles of incorporation generally provide for
approval of amendments to our articles of incorporation and
extraordinary transactions by the stockholders entitled to cast
at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Our articles of incorporation also provide that certain
amendments and any proposal for our conversion, whether by
merger or otherwise, from a closed-end company to an open-end
company or any proposal for our liquidation or dissolution
requires the approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at
least 75.0% of the votes entitled to
102
be cast on such matter. However, if such amendment or proposal
is approved by at least 75.0% of our continuing directors (in
addition to approval by our board of directors), such amendment
or proposal may be approved by the stockholders entitled to cast
a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter.
The continuing directors are defined in our articles
of incorporation as our current directors, as well as those
directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or
whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by
a majority of the continuing directors then on the board of
directors.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that the board
of directors will have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend
or repeal any provision of our bylaws.
No
Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection
with the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, or Control
Share Act, discussed below, as permitted by the Maryland General
Corporation Law, our articles of incorporation provide that
stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights,
unless the board of directors, upon the affirmative vote of a
majority of the board of directors, shall determine that such
rights apply, with respect to all or any class or series of
stock, to one or more transactions occurring after the date of
determination in connection with which holders of such shares
would otherwise be entitled to exercise such rights.
Control
Share Acquisitions
The Control Share Act provides that control shares of a Maryland
corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no
voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
Shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by employees who
are directors of the corporation are excluded from shares
entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares
of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock
owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror is
able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except
solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the
acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within
one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third;
|
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority; or
|
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power.
|
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an
acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth
above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person
is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously
obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means
the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition may compel the board of directors of the corporation
to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within
50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the
shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an
undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request
for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the
question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase
for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those
for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right
of the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to
certain conditions and limitations. Fair value is determined,
without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control
shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by
the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the
voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If
voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders
meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of
the shares entitled to vote, all other
103
stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of
the shares as determined for purposes of appraisal rights may
not be less than the highest price per share paid by the
acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired
in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation
is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions
approved or exempted by the articles of incorporation or bylaws
of the corporation. Moreover, it does not apply to a
corporation, such as us, registered under the 1940 Act as a
closed-end investment company unless the board of directors
adopts a resolution that the corporation will be subject to the
Control Share Act. Our board of directors has not adopted and
does not presently intend to adopt, such a resolution.
Business
Combinations
Under the Maryland Business Combination Act, or the Business
Combination Act, business combinations between a
Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an
affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five
years after the most recent date on which the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business
combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or,
in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested
stockholder is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who beneficially owns 10.0% or more of the voting
power of the corporations shares; or
|
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time
within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was
the beneficial owner of 10.0% or more of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of the corporation.
|
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if
the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by
which such stockholder otherwise would have become an interested
stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of
directors may provide that its approval is subject to
compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and
conditions determined by the board.
After the
5-year
prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland
corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be
recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and
approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
|
|
|
|
|
80.0% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding
shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
|
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting
stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder.
|
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the
corporations common stockholders receive a minimum price,
as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of
cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid
by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are exempted by the board
of directors before the time that the interested stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder. Moreover, it does not apply
to a corporation, such as us, registered under the 1940 Act as a
closed-end investment company unless the board of directors
adopts a resolution that the corporation will be subject to the
Business Combination Act. Our Board of directors has not adopted
and does not presently intend to adopt such a resolution.
Conflict
with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision
of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or any provision of our
articles of incorporation or bylaws conflicts with any provision
of the 1940 Act, the applicable provision of the 1940 Act will
control.
104
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and
to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to
be a complete description of the income tax considerations
applicable to such an investment. For example, we have not
described tax consequences that may be relevant to certain types
of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal
income tax laws, including stockholders subject to the
alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance
companies, dealers in securities, pension plans and trusts, and
financial institutions. This summary assumes that investors hold
our common stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the
Code). The discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury
regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations,
each as of the date of this prospectus and all of which are
subject to change, possibly retroactively, which could affect
the continuing validity of this discussion. We have not sought
and will not seek any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service
regarding this offering. This summary does not discuss any
aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign, state or
local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment under
U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we
invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment
assets.
A U.S. stockholder generally is a beneficial
owner of shares of our common stock who is for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
A citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
A corporation or other entity treated as a corporation, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any political
subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
A trust if a court within the United States is asked to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one
or more United States persons have the authority to control all
substantive decisions of the trust; or
|
|
|
|
A trust or an estate, the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
|
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is not
a U.S. stockholder.
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is
a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock
should consult his, her or its tax advisors with respect to the
purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common
stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an
investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts
of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific
consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and
foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable
tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax
laws.
Election
to be Taxed as a Regulated Investment Company
As a BDC, we elect to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of
the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay
corporate-level federal income taxes on any income that we
distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a
RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, in order to obtain RIC tax treatment, we must
distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least
90.0% of our investment company taxable income,
which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess of
realized net short-term capital gains over realized net
long-term capital losses (the Annual Distribution
Requirement).
105
Taxation
as a Regulated Investment Company
If we:
|
|
|
|
|
qualify as a RIC; and
|
|
|
|
satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement,
|
then we will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion
of our income we distribute (or are deemed to distribute) to
stockholders (other than any built-in gain recognized between
January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007). We will be
subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate
rates on any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed
distributed) to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a 4.0% nondeductible federal excise tax on
certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely
manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98.0% of
our net ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.0%
of our capital gain net income for each calendar year and
(3) any income recognized, but not distributed, in
preceding years. We generally will endeavor in each taxable year
to avoid any U.S. federal excise tax on our earnings.
In order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we
must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times
during each taxable year;
|
|
|
|
derive in each taxable year at least 90.0% of our gross income
from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain
securities, loans, gains from the sale of stock or other
securities, or other income derived with respect to our business
of investing in such stock or securities (the 90.0% Income
Test); and
|
|
|
|
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the
taxable year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least 50.0% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any
one issuer do not represent more than 5.0% of the value of our
assets or more than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities
of the issuer; and
|
|
|
|
no more than 25.0% of the value of our assets is invested in the
securities, other than U.S. government securities or
securities of other RICs, of one issuer or of two or more
issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable
Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the
same or similar or related trades or businesses (the
Diversification Tests).
|
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances
in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt
obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as
having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with
PIK interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a
portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the
life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing
such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may
also have to include in income other amounts that we have not
yet received in cash, such as PIK interest and deferred loan
origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or
are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock.
Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued
will be included in our investment company taxable income for
the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution
to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution
Requirement, even though we will not have received any
corresponding cash amount.
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized
to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy
distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are
not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding
unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See
Regulation Senior Securities. Moreover,
our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution
requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of
our portfolio
and/or
(2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC,
including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of
106
assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or
the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such
dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are
not advantageous.
The remainder of this discussion assumes that we qualify as a
RIC and have satisfied the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Taxation
of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income (which is, generally, our net ordinary income plus
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to
U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. To the extent such
distributions paid by us to non-corporate stockholders
(including individuals) are attributable to dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations, such distributions (Qualifying
Dividends) may be eligible for a maximum tax rate of
15.0%. In this regard, it is anticipated that distributions paid
by us will generally not be attributable to dividends and,
therefore, generally will not qualify for the 15.0% maximum rate
applicable to Qualifying Dividends. Distributions of our net
capital gains (which is generally our realized net long-term
capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital
losses) properly designated by us as capital gain
dividends will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as
long-term capital gains that are currently taxable at a maximum
rate of 15.0% in the case of individuals, trusts or estates,
regardless of the U.S. stockholders holding period
for his, her or its common stock and regardless of whether paid
in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions
in excess of our earnings and profits first will reduce a
U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in such
stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is
reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
U.S. stockholder.
We currently intend to retain some or all of our realized net
long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term
capital losses, but to designate the retained net capital gain
as a deemed distribution. In that case, among other
consequences, we will pay tax on the retained amount, each
U.S. stockholder will be required to include his, her or
its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been
actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the
U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit equal
to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon by
us. Because we expect to pay tax on any retained capital gains
at our regular corporate tax rate, and because that rate is in
excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on
long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual
U.S. stockholders will be treated as having paid will
exceed the tax they owe on the capital gain distribution and
such excess generally may be refunded or claimed as a credit
against the U.S. stockholders other U.S. federal
income tax obligations. The amount of the deemed distribution
net of such tax will be added to the
U.S. stockholders cost basis for his, her or its
common stock. In order to utilize the deemed distribution
approach, we must provide written notice to our stockholders
prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the
relevant taxable year. We cannot treat any of our investment
company taxable income as a deemed distribution.
In any fiscal year, we may elect to make distributions to our
stockholders in excess of our taxable earnings for that fiscal
year. As a result, a portion of those distributions may be
deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual
Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and
(2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that
year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a
dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it
had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make
such an election, the U.S. stockholder will still be
treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which
the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us
in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable
to stockholders of record on a specified date in such a month
and actually paid during January of the following year, will be
treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders
on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
107
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly
before the record date of a distribution, the price of the
shares will include the value of the distribution and the
investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though
economically it may represent a return of his, her or its
investment.
A stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss if
the stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her or its
shares of our common stock. The amount of gain or loss will be
measured by the difference between such stockholders
adjusted tax basis in the common stock sold and the amount of
the proceeds received in exchange. Any gain arising from such
sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term
capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held his, her or its
shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it will be classified
as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss
arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common
stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term
capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain
dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed
received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a
portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of
our common stock may be disallowed if other shares of our common
stock are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after
the disposition.
In general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are
subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15.0% on their
net capital gain (i.e., the excess of realized net long-term
capital gains over realized net short-term capital losses),
recognized prior to January 1, 2011, including any
long-term capital gain derived from an investment in our shares.
Such rate is lower than the maximum rate on ordinary income
currently payable by individuals. Corporate
U.S. stockholders currently are subject to federal income
tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35.0% rate also applied
to ordinary income. Non-corporate stockholders with net capital
losses for a year (i.e., capital losses in excess of capital
gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against
their ordinary income each year; any net capital losses of a
non-corporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be
carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in the
Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any net
capital losses for a year, but may carry back such losses for
three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly
as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice
detailing, on a per share and per distribution basis, the
amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital
gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years
distributions generally will be reported to the Internal Revenue
Service (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for
the 15.0% maximum rate). Dividends paid by us generally will not
be eligible for the dividends-received deduction or the
preferential tax rate applicable to Qualifying Dividends because
our income generally will not consist of dividends.
Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local and
foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholders
particular situation.
We may be required to withhold federal income tax (backup
withholding) currently at a rate of 28.0% from all taxable
distributions to any non-corporate U.S. stockholder
(1) who fails to furnish us with a correct taxpayer
identification number or a certificate that such stockholder is
exempt from backup withholding, or (2) with respect to whom
the IRS notifies us that such stockholder has failed to properly
report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to
respond to notices to that effect. An individuals taxpayer
identification number is his or her social security number. Any
amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit
against the U.S. stockholders federal income tax
liability, provided that proper information is provided to the
IRS.
Taxation
of Non-U.S.
Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An
investment in the shares by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
may have adverse tax consequences.
Non-U.S. stockholders
should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income to
Non-U.S. stockholders
(including interest income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized long-term capital losses, which
generally would be free of withholding if paid to
Non-U.S. stockholders
directly) will be subject to withholding of
108
federal tax at a 30.0% rate (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits unless an applicable exception applies. If
the distributions are effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and, if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a
permanent establishment in the United States, we will not be
required to withhold federal tax if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements, although the distributions will be subject to
federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons.
(Special certification requirements apply to a
Non-U.S. stockholder
that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, and such
entities are urged to consult their own tax advisors.)
In addition, with respect to certain distributions made to
Non-U.S. stockholders
in our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004 and
before January 1, 2008, no withholding will be required and
the distributions generally will not be subject to federal
income tax if (i) the distributions are properly designated
in a notice timely delivered to our stockholders as
interest-related dividends or short-term
capital gain dividends, (ii) the distributions are
derived from sources specified in the Code for such dividends
and (iii) certain other requirements are satisfied.
Currently, we do not anticipate that any significant amount of
our distributions will be designated as eligible for this
exemption from withholding.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and gains realized by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
upon the sale of our common stock, will not be subject to
federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to
federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the
case may be, are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the
Non-U.S. stockholder
and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a
permanent establishment maintained by the
Non-U.S. stockholder
in the United States.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed
rather than actual distributions, a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will be entitled to a federal income tax credit or tax refund
equal to the stockholders allocable share of the tax we
pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In
order to obtain the refund, the
Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file
a federal income tax return even if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer
identification number or file a federal income tax return. For a
corporate
Non-U.S. stockholder,
distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon
the sale of our common stock that are effectively connected to a
U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a
30.0% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable
treaty). Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be
appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise
subject to withholding of federal tax, may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of federal income
tax on dividends unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets
documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a
Non-U.S. stockholder
or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
As a RIC, we will be subject to the alternative minimum tax
(AMT), but any items that are treated differently
for AMT purposes must be apportioned between us and our
stockholders and this may affect the stockholders AMT
liabilities. Although regulations explaining the precise method
of apportionment have not yet been issued by the Internal
Revenue Service, we intend in general to apportion these items
in the same proportion that dividends paid to each stockholder
bear to our taxable income (determined without regard to the
dividends paid deduction), unless we determine that a different
method for a particular item is warranted under the
circumstances.
Non-U.S. persons
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state,
local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the
shares.
Failure
to Qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
If we are unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we would be
subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate
rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our
stockholders.
109
Distributions would not be required, and any distributions would
be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income
eligible for the 15.0% maximum rate to the extent of our current
and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain
limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be
eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in
excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would
be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the
stockholders tax basis, and any remaining distributions
would be treated as a capital gain.
REGULATION
We, and Triangle SBIC, have elected to be treated as a BDC under
the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and
restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their
affiliates, principal underwriters and affiliates of those
affiliates or underwriters. The 1940 Act requires that a
majority of the directors be persons other than interested
persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In
addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the
nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our
election as, a BDC unless approved by a majority of our
outstanding voting securities.
The 1940 Act defines a majority of the outstanding voting
securities as the lesser of (i) 67.0% or more of the
voting securities present at a meeting if the holders of more
than 50.0% of our outstanding voting securities are present or
represented by proxy, or (ii) 50.0% of our voting
securities.
Qualifying
Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than
assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act,
which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time
the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least
70.0% of the companys total assets. The principal
categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are any
of the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any
public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer
(subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio
company, or from any person who is, or has been during the
preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible
portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such
rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio
company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal
place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small
business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a
company that would be an investment company but for certain
exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
(i) does not have any class of securities that is traded on
a national securities exchange or has a class of securities
listed on a national securities exchange but has an aggregate
market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity
of less than $250.0 million;
(ii) is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies
including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a
director of the eligible portfolio company; or
(iii) is a small and solvent company having total assets of
not more than $4.0 million and capital and surplus of not
less than $2.0 million.
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we
control.
(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a
U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an
affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident
thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the
purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as
they came due without material assistance other than
conventional lending or financing arrangements.
110
(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased
from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready
market for such securities and we already own 60.0% of the
outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on
or with respect to securities described in (1) through
(4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or
rights relating to such securities.
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less
from the time of investment.
In addition, a BDC must have been organized and have its
principal place of business in the United States and must be
operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of
securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for
the purpose of the 70.0% test, we must either control the issuer
of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer
of the securities (other than small and solvent companies
described above) significant managerial assistance; except that,
where we purchase such securities in conjunction with one or
more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in
the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making
available managerial assistance means, among other things, any
arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or
employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide,
significant guidance and counsel concerning the management,
operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio
company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying
assets, as described above, our investments may consist of
cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or
high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from
the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as
temporary investments, so that 70.0% of our assets are
qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in
U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided
that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or
securities issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies. A
repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such
as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by
the seller to repurchase it at an
agreed-upon
future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase
price by an amount that reflects an
agreed-upon
interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase
agreements. However, if more than 25.0% of our total assets
constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we
would not meet the Diversification Tests in order to qualify as
a RIC for federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend to
enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in
excess of this limit. Our management team will monitor the
creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into
repurchase agreement transactions.
Senior
Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple
classes of debt and one class of stock senior to our common
stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at
least equal to 200.0% immediately after each such issuance. In
addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we
must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our
stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares
unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time
of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up
to 5.0% of the value of our total assets for temporary or
emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a
discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Risk
Factors Risks Relating to Our Business and
Structure Because we intend to distribute
substantially all of our income to our stockholders to maintain
our status as a regulated investment company, we will continue
to need additional capital to finance our growth and regulations
governing our operation as a business development company will
affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional
capital.
111
Code of
Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines
We have adopted a code of ethics and corporate governance
guidelines covering ethics and business conduct. These documents
apply to our directors, officers and employees. Our code of
ethics and corporate governance guidelines are available on the
Investor Relations section of our website at the following URL:
http://ir.tcap.com/governance.cfm.
We will report any amendments to or waivers of a required
provision of our code of ethics and corporate governance
guidelines on our website or in a Current Report on
Form 8-K.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best
interest of our stockholders. We review on a
case-by-case
basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine
its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although we
generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact
on our portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if
there exists compelling long-term reasons to do so.
Our proxy voting decisions are made by the investment
professionals who are responsible for monitoring each of our
investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a
conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved
in the decision making process disclose to our chief compliance
officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and
any contact that he or she has had with any interested party
regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the
decision making process or vote administration are prohibited
from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to
reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Stockholders may, without charge, obtain information regarding
how we voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by
making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief
Compliance Officer, 3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612.
Other
We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly
participating in certain transactions with our affiliates
without the prior approval of our board of directors who are not
interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.
We will be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with
the 1940 Act.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a
reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against
larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a business development
company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or
officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising
from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or
reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such
persons office.
We are required to adopt and implement written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the
federal securities laws, review these policies and procedures
annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their
implementation, and to designate a chief compliance officer to
be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.
Small
Business Administration Regulations
Triangle SBIC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, is licensed by the
Small Business Administration to operate as a Small Business
Investment Company under Section 301(c) of the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958. Triangle SBIC initially
obtained its SBIC license on September 11, 2003.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity
capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations,
SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses, invest in the
equity securities of such businesses and provide them with
consulting and advisory services. Triangle SBIC has typically
invested in senior and subordinated debt, acquired warrants
and/or made
equity investments in qualifying small businesses.
112
Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses
generally include businesses that (together with their
affiliates) have a tangible net worth not exceeding
$18.0 million and have average annual net income after
Federal income taxes not exceeding $6.0 million (average
net income to be computed without benefit of any carryover loss)
for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must
devote 20.0% of its investment activity to smaller
concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern generally
includes businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding
$6.0 million and have average annual net income after
Federal income taxes not exceeding $2.0 million (average
net income to be computed without benefit of any net carryover
loss) for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also
provide alternative size standard criteria to determine
eligibility for designation as an eligible small business or
smaller concern, which criteria depend on the industry in which
the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the
number of employees and gross revenue. However, once an SBIC has
invested in a company, it may continue to make follow on
investments in the company, regardless of the size of the
portfolio company at the time of the follow on investment, up to
the time of the portfolio companys initial public offering.
The SBA prohibits an SBIC from providing funds to small
businesses for certain purposes, such as relending and
investment outside the United States, to businesses engaged in a
few prohibited industries, and to certain passive
(non-operating) companies. In addition, without prior SBA
approval, an SBIC may not invest an amount equal to more than
20.0% of the SBICs regulatory capital in any one portfolio
company.
The SBA places certain limitations on the financing terms of
investments by SBICs in portfolio companies (such as limiting
the permissible interest rate on debt securities held by an SBIC
in a portfolio company). Although prior regulations prohibited
an SBIC from controlling a small business concern except in
limited circumstances, regulations adopted by the SBA in 2002
now allow an SBIC to exercise control over a small business for
a period of seven years from the date on which the SBIC
initially acquires its control position. This control period may
be extended for an additional period of time with the SBAs
prior written approval.
The SBA restricts the ability of an SBIC to lend money to any of
its officers, directors and employees or to invest in affiliates
thereof. The SBA also prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a
change of control of an SBIC or transfers that would
result in any person (or a group of persons acting in concert)
owning 10.0% or more of a class of capital stock of a licensed
SBIC. A change of control is any event which would
result in the transfer of the power, direct or indirect, to
direct the management and policies of an SBIC, whether through
ownership, contractual arrangements or otherwise.
An SBIC (or group of SBICs under common control) may generally
have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA in amounts up
to twice the amount of the privately-raised funds of the
SBIC(s). Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a maturity of ten
years, require semi-annual payments of interest, do not require
any principal payments prior to maturity, and, historically,
were subject to certain prepayment penalties. Those prepayment
penalties no longer apply as of September 2006. As of
December 31, 2008, we had issued $115.1 million of SBA
guaranteed debentures, which had an annual weighted-average
interest rate of 5.8%. The calculation of the weighted-average
interest rate includes the interim rates charged on SBA
guaranteed debentures which have not yet been pooled. SBA
regulations currently limit the dollar amount of outstanding SBA
guaranteed debentures that may be issued by any one SBIC (or
group of SBICs under common control) to $150 million (which
amount is subject to increase on an annual basis based on cost
of living increases).
SBICs must invest idle funds that are not being used to make
loans in investments permitted under SBA regulations in the
following limited types of securities: (i) direct
obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and
interest by, the United States government, which mature within
15 months from the date of the investment;
(ii) repurchase agreements with federally insured
institutions with a maturity of seven days or less (and the
securities underlying the repurchase obligations must be direct
obligations of or guaranteed by the federal government);
(iii) certificates of deposit with a maturity of one year
or less, issued by a federally insured institution; (iv) a
deposit account in a federally insured institution that is
subject to a withdrawal restriction of one year or less;
(v) a checking account in a federally insured institution;
or (vi) a reasonable petty cash fund.
113
SBICs are periodically examined and audited by the SBAs
staff to determine its compliance with SBIC regulations and are
periodically required to file certain forms with the SBA.
Neither the SBA nor the U.S. government or any of its
agencies or officers has approved any ownership interest to be
issued by us or any obligation that we or any of our
subsidiaries may incur.
Securities
Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Compliance
We are subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of
the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly, annual and
current reports, proxy statements and other required items. In
addition, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
which imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on
publicly-held companies and their insiders. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer are required to certify the accuracy of the
financial statements contained in our periodic reports;
|
|
|
|
pursuant to Item 307 of
Regulation S-K,
our periodic reports are required to disclose our conclusions
about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures; and
|
|
|
|
pursuant to
Rule 13a-15
of the Exchange Act, beginning with our fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007, our management is required to prepare a
report regarding its assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting, and beginning with our fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009, such report must be audited by our
independent registered public accounting firm.
|
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current
policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
We monitor our compliance with all regulations that are adopted
under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take all actions necessary
to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
The
Nasdaq Global Market Corporate Governance Regulations
The Nasdaq Global Market has adopted corporate governance
regulations that listed companies must comply with. We believe
we are in compliance with such corporate governance listing
standards. We intend to monitor our compliance with all future
listing standards and to take all necessary actions to ensure
that we are in compliance therewith.
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell our common stock through underwriters or dealers,
directly to one or more purchasers or through agents or through
a combination of any such methods of sale. Any underwriter or
agent involved in the offer and sale of our common stock will
also be named in the applicable prospectus supplement.
The distribution of our common stock may be effected from time
to time in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices,
which may be changed, at prevailing market prices at the time of
sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or at
negotiated prices, provided, however, that the offering price
per share of our common stock less any underwriting commissions
or discounts must equal or exceed the net asset value per share
of our common stock except that we may sell shares of our common
stock at a price below net asset value per share if a majority
of the number of beneficial holders of our stock have approved
such a sale or if the following conditions are met:
(i) holders of a majority of our stock and a majority of
our stock not held by affiliated persons have approved issuance
at less than net asset value per share during the one year
period prior to such sale; (ii) a majority of our directors
who have no financial interest in the sale and a majority of
such directors who are not interested persons of us have
determined that such sale would be in our best interest and in
the best interests of our stockholders; and (iii) a
majority of our directors who have no financial interest in the
sale and a majority of such directors who are not interested
persons of us, in consultation with the underwriter or
underwriters of the offering if it is to be underwritten, have
determined in good faith, and as of a time immediately prior to
the first solicitation by or on behalf of us of firm commitments
to purchase such securities or immediately prior to the issuance
of such securities, that the price at which such securities are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of those securities, less any distributing
commission or discount.
114
On May 7, 2008, our common stockholders voted to allow us
to issue common stock at a price below net asset value per share
for a period of one year ending May 6, 2009. Our
stockholders did not specify a maximum discount below net asset
value at which we are able to issue our common stock; however,
we do not intend to issue shares of our common stock below net
asset value unless our board of directors determines that it
would be in our stockholders best interests to do so.
In connection with the sale of our common stock, underwriters or
agents may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of
our common stock, for whom they may act as agents, in the form
of discounts, concessions or commissions. Underwriters may sell
our common stock to or through dealers and such dealers may
receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or
commissions from the underwriters
and/or
commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agents.
Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the
distribution of our common stock may be deemed to be
underwriters under the Securities Act, and any discounts and
commissions they receive from us and any profit realized by them
on the resale of our common stock may be deemed to be
underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such
compensation received from us will be described in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or
sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties
in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable
prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those
derivatives, the third parties may sell common stock covered by
this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement,
including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may
use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to
settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings
of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement
of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of
stock. The third parties in such sale transactions will be
underwriters and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be
identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a
post-effective amendment).
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement
will be listed on The Nasdaq Global Market, or another exchange
on which our common stock is traded.
Under agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers
and agents who participate in the distribution of our common
stock may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in transactions
with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of
business.
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will
authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to
solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase our common
stock from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment and
delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such
contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies,
educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all
cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations
of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the
condition that the purchase of our common stock shall not at the
time of delivery be prohibited under the laws of the
jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject. The
underwriters and such other agents will not have any
responsibility in respect of the validity or performance of such
contracts. Such contracts will be subject only to those
conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement, and the
prospectus supplement will set forth the commission payable for
solicitation of such contracts.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states,
if applicable, our common stock offered hereby will be sold in
such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in certain states, our common stock may
not be sold unless it has been registered or qualified for sale
in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or
qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member
of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. will not be
greater than 10.0% for the sale of any securities being
registered, including 0.5% for due diligence.
115
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our securities are held under a custody agreement by
U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the
custodian is: U.S. Bank National Association, Attn:
Institutional Trust & Custody, 214 North Tryon Street;
27th floor, Charlotte, NC 28202. The Bank of New York
Mellon acts as our transfer agent, dividend paying agent and
registrar. The principal business address of our transfer agent
is BNY Mellon, Shareowner Services, PO Box 358035,
Pittsburgh, PA,
15252-8035,
telephone number:
(866) 228-7201.
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in
privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers
in the normal course of our business. Our management team is
primarily responsible for the execution of the publicly traded
securities portion of our portfolio transactions and the
allocation of brokerage commissions. We do not expect to execute
transactions through any particular broker or dealer, but will
seek to obtain the best net results for us, taking into account
such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage
commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of
execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the
firms risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities.
While we will generally seek reasonably competitive trade
execution costs, we will not necessarily pay the lowest spread
or commission available. Subject to applicable legal
requirements, we may select a broker based partly upon brokerage
or research services provided to us. In return for such
services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers
would charge if we determine in good faith that such commission
is reasonable in relation to the services provided. We did not
pay any brokerage commissions during the years ended
December 31, 2007 or 2008.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for us by Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC, Memphis, Tennessee. Venable LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, will pass upon the legality of the common
stock offered by us and certain other matters of Maryland law.
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for underwriters, if
any, by the counsel named in the prospectus supplement, if any.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm whose address is 4130 ParkLake Avenue,
Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27612, has audited our financial
statements and financial highlights at December 31, 2008
and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, as set forth in their report. We have
included our financial statements and financial highlights in
the prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in
reliance on Ernst & Young LLPs report, given on
its authority as an expert in accounting and auditing.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to the common stock offered by this
prospectus. The registration statement contains additional
information about us and the common stock being offered by this
prospectus.
We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information meeting
the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may
inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other
information, as well as the registration statement and related
exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC
at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
e-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549.
116
INDEX TO
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of
Changes in Net Assets for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of Cash
Flows for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-15
|
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Triangle Capital Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Triangle Capital Corporation (the Company), including the
schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in net assets, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the
consolidated financial highlights for the years then ended. We
have also audited the accompanying combined statements of
operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows of Triangle
Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006
and the combined financial highlights for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These
financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
and combined financial statements and financial highlights based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were
not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 by correspondence with the
portfolio companies. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Triangle
Capital Corporation at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
consolidated results of its operations, changes in net assets,
and its cash flows for the years then ended, the financial
highlights for the years then ended, and the combined results of
operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows of Triangle
Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006,
and the combined financial highlights for the three years in the
period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 24, 2009
F-1
Triangle
Capital Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control / Non-Affiliate investments (cost of $138,413,589
and $66,129,119 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
$
|
135,712,877
|
|
|
$
|
68,388,014
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost of $30,484,491 and $24,023,264 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
33,894,556
|
|
|
|
24,576,462
|
|
Control investments (cost of $11,253,458 and $15,727,418 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
20,071,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
113,036,240
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
27,193,287
|
|
|
|
21,787,750
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
679,828
|
|
|
|
305,159
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
95,325
|
|
|
|
47,477
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
|
3,545,410
|
|
|
|
999,159
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
48,020
|
|
|
|
34,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
213,667,161
|
|
|
$
|
136,209,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,608,909
|
|
|
$
|
1,144,222
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,881,761
|
|
|
|
698,735
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
2,766,945
|
|
|
|
2,041,159
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
30,436
|
|
|
|
52,598
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,625
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
843,947
|
|
|
|
1,760,259
|
|
SBA guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
115,110,000
|
|
|
|
37,010,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
122,241,998
|
|
|
|
42,737,598
|
|
Net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share
(150,000,000 shares authorized, 6,917,363 and
6,803,863 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
6,804
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
87,836,786
|
|
|
|
86,949,189
|
|
Investment income in excess of distributions
|
|
|
2,115,157
|
|
|
|
1,738,797
|
|
Accumulated realized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
356,495
|
|
|
|
(618,620
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments
|
|
|
1,109,808
|
|
|
|
5,396,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets
|
|
|
91,425,163
|
|
|
|
93,472,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net assets
|
|
$
|
213,667,161
|
|
|
$
|
136,209,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-2
Triangle
Capital Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
Investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest, fee and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control / Non-Affiliate investments
|
|
$
|
12,381,411
|
|
|
$
|
6,258,670
|
|
|
$
|
4,488,831
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
3,478,644
|
|
|
|
1,808,664
|
|
|
|
638,318
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
1,434,687
|
|
|
|
1,323,876
|
|
|
|
293,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan interest, fee and dividend income
|
|
|
17,294,742
|
|
|
|
9,391,210
|
|
|
|
5,420,681
|
|
Paid-in-kind interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control / Non-Affiliate investments
|
|
|
2,657,281
|
|
|
|
871,184
|
|
|
|
815,408
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
665,817
|
|
|
|
225,622
|
|
|
|
40,208
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
438,688
|
|
|
|
424,308
|
|
|
|
166,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid-in-kind interest income
|
|
|
3,761,786
|
|
|
|
1,521,114
|
|
|
|
1,022,306
|
|
Interest income from cash and cash equivalent investments
|
|
|
302,970
|
|
|
|
1,823,519
|
|
|
|
279,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
21,359,498
|
|
|
|
12,735,843
|
|
|
|
6,722,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,227,851
|
|
|
|
2,073,311
|
|
|
|
1,833,458
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
255,273
|
|
|
|
112,660
|
|
|
|
99,920
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,423
|
|
|
|
1,589,070
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,254,096
|
|
|
|
3,894,240
|
|
|
|
115,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
10,737,220
|
|
|
|
6,312,634
|
|
|
|
3,637,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
10,622,278
|
|
|
|
6,423,209
|
|
|
|
3,085,316
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments Non-Control
/ Non-Affiliate
|
|
|
(1,393,139
|
)
|
|
|
(759,634
|
)
|
|
|
6,026,948
|
|
Net realized gain on investment Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investment Control
|
|
|
2,828,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
|
|
(4,286,375
|
)
|
|
|
3,061,107
|
|
|
|
(414,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss) on investments before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,850,767
|
)
|
|
|
2,442,487
|
|
|
|
5,612,024
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
133,010
|
|
|
|
52,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
7,638,501
|
|
|
$
|
8,813,098
|
|
|
$
|
8,697,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per
share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic
and diluted
|
|
|
6,877,669
|
|
|
|
6,728,733
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting
from operations to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,739,386
|
|
Limited partners
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
6,957,954
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
Triangle
Capital Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
in Excess of
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid In
|
|
|
(Less Than)
|
|
|
(Losses) on
|
|
|
(Depreciation) of
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
21,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
(10,625,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,489,447
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,364,547
|
|
Partners capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625,000
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,085,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,085,316
|
|
Realized gains on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,026,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,026,948
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414,924
|
)
|
|
|
(414,924
|
)
|
Distributions to partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,004,628
|
)
|
|
|
(2,526,948
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,531,576
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
21,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,570,135
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,335,076
|
|
|
$
|
25,156,811
|
|
Public offering of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,770,000
|
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
64,723,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,728,037
|
|
Formation transactions
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(21,250,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,916,660
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
21,248,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,423,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,423,209
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618,620
|
)
|
|
|
1,111,306
|
|
|
|
492,686
|
|
Net unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949,801
|
|
|
|
1,949,801
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,598
|
)
|
Return of capital and other tax related adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649,856
|
)
|
|
|
649,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,103
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
1,626,095
|
|
|
|
(6,631,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,005,546
|
)
|
Tax distribution to partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
6,803,863
|
|
|
$
|
6,804
|
|
|
$
|
86,949,189
|
|
|
$
|
1,738,797
|
|
|
$
|
(618,620
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,396,183
|
|
|
$
|
93,472,353
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,622,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,622,278
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,311
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,435,608
|
|
|
|
(1,269,437
|
)
|
|
|
166,171
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,016,938
|
)
|
|
|
(3,016,938
|
)
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,010
|
)
|
Return of capital and other tax related adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612,399
|
|
|
|
(151,906
|
)
|
|
|
(460,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,961,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,961,002
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,500
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
|
$
|
6,917
|
|
|
$
|
87,836,786
|
|
|
$
|
2,115,157
|
|
|
$
|
356,495
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,808
|
|
|
$
|
91,425,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
Triangle
Capital Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
7,638,501
|
|
|
$
|
8,813,098
|
|
|
$
|
8,697,340
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of portfolio investments
|
|
|
(93,054,022
|
)
|
|
|
(64,159,172
|
)
|
|
|
(21,458,478
|
)
|
Repayments received/sales of portfolio investments
|
|
|
20,968,397
|
|
|
|
10,470,803
|
|
|
|
9,965,446
|
|
Loan origination and other fees received
|
|
|
1,686,996
|
|
|
|
1,272,002
|
|
|
|
607,794
|
|
Net realized (gain) loss on investments
|
|
|
(1,435,608
|
)
|
|
|
618,620
|
|
|
|
(6,026,948
|
)
|
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments
|
|
|
3,516,855
|
|
|
|
(4,821,366
|
)
|
|
|
414,923
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
769,519
|
|
|
|
1,760,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid - in - kind interest accrued, net of payments
received
|
|
|
(1,783,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,280,950
|
)
|
|
|
(578,724
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
255,273
|
|
|
|
112,660
|
|
|
|
99,920
|
|
Recognition of loan origination and other fees
|
|
|
(515,289
|
)
|
|
|
(677,615
|
)
|
|
|
(435,492
|
)
|
Accretion of loan discounts
|
|
|
(169,548
|
)
|
|
|
(205,725
|
)
|
|
|
(169,036
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
16,681
|
|
|
|
7,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
275,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees receivable
|
|
|
(374,669
|
)
|
|
|
(170,340
|
)
|
|
|
(85,236
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(47,848
|
)
|
|
|
(47,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
464,687
|
|
|
|
349,239
|
|
|
|
781,757
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,183,026
|
|
|
|
92,439
|
|
|
|
40,228
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
(22,162
|
)
|
|
|
52,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to Triangle Capital Partners, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(60,627,188
|
)
|
|
|
(47,843,113
|
)
|
|
|
(8,116,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
|
(41,980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
|
(41,980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under SBA guaranteed debentures payable
|
|
|
78,100,000
|
|
|
|
5,210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing fees paid
|
|
|
(2,801,524
|
)
|
|
|
(126,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,728,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020,646
|
|
|
|
(1,020,646
|
)
|
Partners capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625,000
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(9,235,216
|
)
|
|
|
(2,964,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(751,613
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
66,063,260
|
|
|
|
67,116,341
|
|
|
|
4,605,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,405,537
|
|
|
|
19,231,248
|
|
|
|
(3,510,662
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
21,787,750
|
|
|
|
2,556,502
|
|
|
|
6,067,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
27,193,287
|
|
|
$
|
21,787,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,556,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
3,044,825
|
|
|
$
|
1,980,872
|
|
|
$
|
1,793,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of non-cash financing transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid
|
|
$
|
2,766,945
|
|
|
$
|
2,041,159
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued distribution to partners
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
531,566
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Non - Control / Non - Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambient Air Corporation (AAC) and Peaden-Hobbs
Mechanical, LLC (PHM) (6%)*
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated
Note-AAC (14%, Due
03/11)
|
|
$
|
3,182,231
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
Note-AAC (18%,
Due 03/11)
|
|
|
1,917,045
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
1,888,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock-PHM
(126,634 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
126,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants-AAC (455
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,361
|
|
|
|
600,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099,276
|
|
|
|
5,231,971
|
|
|
|
5,689,710
|
|
American De-Rosa Lamparts, LLC and Hallmark Lighting (8%)*
|
|
Wholesale and
Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15.25%, Due 10/13)
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208,166
|
|
|
|
8,064,571
|
|
|
|
6,894,500
|
|
American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC (4%)*
|
|
Direct Marketing
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 03/15)
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,035,038
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
|
|
3,957,113
|
|
APO Newco, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Commercial and
Consumer
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
|
|
1,907,664
|
|
|
|
Marketing Products
|
|
Unit purchase
warrant (87,302
Class C units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
1,033,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,993,336
|
|
|
|
1,932,864
|
|
|
|
2,941,064
|
|
ARC Industries, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Remediation Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(19%, Due 11/10)
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528,587
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
|
|
2,508,276
|
|
Art Headquarters, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Retail, Wholesale
and Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/10)
|
|
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership unit
warrants (15% of
units (150 units))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333,488
|
|
|
|
2,350,751
|
|
|
|
2,309,951
|
|
Assurance Operations Corporation (4%)*
|
|
Auto Components /
Metal Fabrication
|
|
Subordinated Note
(17%, Due 03/12)
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
3,985,742
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (57
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,026,884
|
|
|
|
4,242,885
|
|
|
|
3,261,800
|
|
CV Holdings, LLC (12%)*
|
|
Specialty
Healthcare Products
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16%, Due 09/13)
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
|
|
9,780,508
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,776,412
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
|
|
10,654,908
|
|
Cyrus Networks, LLC (8%)*
|
|
Data Center
Services Provider
|
|
Senior Note
(6%, Due 07/13)
|
|
|
5,539,867
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
|
|
5,524,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(9%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
1,196,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of
Credit (6)%
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
253,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,989,820
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
|
|
6,974,834
|
|
F-6
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
DataPath, Inc. (0%)*
|
|
Satellite
Communication
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(210,263 shares)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Systems Protection, Inc. (5%)*
|
|
Power Protection
Systems
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 12/15)
|
|
|
3,059,267
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
|
|
3,032,533
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Note
(6%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
930,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(500 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989,902
|
|
|
|
4,248,168
|
|
|
|
4,248,168
|
|
Energy Hardware Holdings, LLC (0%)*
|
|
Machined Parts
Distribution
|
|
Voting Units (4,833
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
FCL Graphics, Inc. (8%)*
|
|
Commercial Printing
Services
|
|
Senior Note
(8%, Due 5/12)
|
|
|
1,669,200
|
|
|
|
1,663,083
|
|
|
|
1,663,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Note
(12%, Due 5/13)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
1,993,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(18%, Due 11/13)
|
|
|
3,393,186
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
3,382,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062,386
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
|
|
7,038,436
|
|
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. (1%)*
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Notes
(12%, Due 04/11)
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,356,781
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (283
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,905
|
|
|
|
11,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388,362
|
|
|
|
2,639,686
|
|
|
|
1,011,719
|
|
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (4%)*
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(11%, Due 12/11)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(5,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
583,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,583,600
|
|
Gerli & Company (2%)*
|
|
Specialty Woven
Fabrics
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 08/11)
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,092,786
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (56,559
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161,439
|
|
|
|
3,176,200
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Holding Company LLC (10%)*
|
|
Cleaning and Repair
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
|
|
7,422,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant
(2.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,300
|
|
|
|
1,407,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,095,149
|
|
|
|
7,985,565
|
|
|
|
8,829,565
|
|
Jenkins Service, LLC (10%)*
|
|
Restoration Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(17.5%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
8,411,172
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
|
|
8,266,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Note
(10%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
1,336,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,786,172
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
F-7
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Library Systems & Services, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Municipal Business
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,948,573
|
|
|
$
|
1,948,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (112
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,995
|
|
|
|
802,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,007,568
|
|
|
|
2,751,073
|
|
Novolyte Technologies, Inc. (8%)*
|
|
Specialty
Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16%, Due 04/15)
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
6,880,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
(600 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(22,960 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,048,222
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
|
|
7,630,696
|
|
Syrgis Holdings, Inc. (6%)*
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note (7%,
Due 08/12-02/14)
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
|
|
4,602,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units (2,114
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,632,500
|
|
|
|
5,602,773
|
|
|
|
5,135,473
|
|
TrustHouse Services Group, Inc. (5%)*
|
|
Food Management
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 09/15)
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
|
|
4,186,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(1,495 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Units
(79 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264,494
|
|
|
|
4,686,542
|
|
|
|
4,394,042
|
|
Twin-Star International, Inc. (6%)*
|
|
Consumer Home
Furnishings
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
|
|
4,439,137
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note (8%,
Due 04/13)
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
1,301,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,801,921
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
|
|
5,741,058
|
|
Waste Recyclers Holdings, LLC (13%)*
|
|
Environmental and
Facilities Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15.5%, Due 01/13)
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
|
|
8,935,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Preferred
Units (300 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
2,251,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
Purchase Warrant
(1,170,083 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
748,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
(153,219 Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
153,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,106,995
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
|
|
12,088,485
|
|
Wholesale Floors, Inc. (4%)*
|
|
Commercial Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 06/14)
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest
Purchase Warrant
(4.0)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,474,747
|
|
|
|
3,341,947
|
|
Yellowstone Landscape Group, Inc. (14%)*
|
|
Landscaping Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,261,710
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
12,965,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non Control / Non Affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,090,259
|
|
|
|
138,413,589
|
|
|
|
135,712,877
|
|
F-8
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Point, LLC (6%)*
|
|
Asset Management
Software Provider
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 03/13)
|
|
$
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
$
|
5,035,428
|
|
|
$
|
5,035,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(10 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
371,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123,925
|
|
|
|
5,535,428
|
|
|
|
5,406,828
|
|
Axxiom Manufacturing, Inc. (3%)*
|
|
Industrial Equipment
Manufacturer
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/11)
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
|
|
2,103,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(34,100 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
408,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrant
(1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124,037
|
|
|
|
2,303,277
|
|
|
|
2,522,777
|
|
Brantley Transportation,
LLC (Brantley
Transportation) and Pine
Street Holdings, LLC (Pine Street)(4) (4%)*
|
|
Oil and Gas Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
Brantley
Transportation
(14%, Due 12/12)
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
3,690,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
Warrants-
Brantley
Transportation
(4,560 common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
41,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
Pine Street (200
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
139,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
Warrants Pine
Street (2,220
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,924,125
|
|
|
|
3,871,525
|
|
Dyson Corporation (12%)*
|
|
Custom Forging and
Fastener
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 12/13)
|
|
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
|
10,123,339
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
|
Class A Units
(1,000,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
964,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,318,750
|
|
|
|
11,123,339
|
|
|
|
11,088,039
|
|
Equisales, LLC (9%)*
|
|
Energy Products and
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/12)
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
|
|
6,226,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(500,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,322,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,319,315
|
|
|
|
6,726,387
|
|
|
|
8,548,787
|
|
Flint Acquisition
Corporation (2%)*
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Preferred Stock
(9,875 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,984,500
|
|
Genapure Corporation (1%)*
|
|
Lab Testing Services
|
|
Genapure Common
Stock (5,594
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
472,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,686,027
|
|
|
|
30,484,491
|
|
|
|
33,894,556
|
|
F-9
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Control Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischbein, LLC (14%)*
|
|
Packaging and
Materials Handling
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16.5%, Due 05/13)
|
|
$
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
$
|
7,053,458
|
|
|
$
|
7,053,458
|
|
|
|
Equipment
Manufacturer
|
|
Membership Units
(4,200,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
|
5,444,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184,066
|
|
|
|
11,253,458
|
|
|
|
12,497,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments, December 31, 2008 (199%)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,960,352
|
|
|
$
|
180,151,538
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Value as a percent of net assets |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Common stock,
preferred stock and all warrants are non income
producing. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Interest rates on subordinated debt include cash interest rate
and, where applicable, paid in kind
interest rate. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
All investments are restricted as to resale and were valued at
fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Pine Street Holdings, LLC is the majority owner of Brantley
Transportation, LLC and its sole business purpose is its
ownership of Brantley Transportation, LLC. |
See accompanying notes.
F-10
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Non - Control /
Non - Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambient Air Corporation (6%)*
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
3,144,654
|
|
|
$
|
2,997,686
|
|
|
$
|
2,997,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 03/11)
|
|
|
1,872,075
|
|
|
|
1,833,206
|
|
|
|
1,833,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (455
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,361
|
|
|
|
929,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,016,729
|
|
|
|
4,973,253
|
|
|
|
5,760,592
|
|
APO Newco, LLC (5%)*
|
|
Commercial and
Consumer
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 03/13)
|
|
|
4,315,262
|
|
|
|
4,214,957
|
|
|
|
4,214,957
|
|
|
|
Marketing Products
|
|
Unit purchase
warrant (87,302
Class C units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
199,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,315,262
|
|
|
|
4,240,157
|
|
|
|
4,413,957
|
|
Art Headquarters, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Retail, Wholesale
and Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/10)
|
|
|
2,441,824
|
|
|
|
2,397,556
|
|
|
|
2,397,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership unit
warrants (15% of
units (150 units))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,800
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,441,824
|
|
|
|
2,438,356
|
|
|
|
2,407,356
|
|
Assurance Operations Corporation (4%)*
|
|
Auto Components /
Metal Fabrication
|
|
Subordinated Note
(17%, Due 03/12)
|
|
|
3,828,527
|
|
|
|
3,776,608
|
|
|
|
3,776,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (200
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,828,527
|
|
|
|
3,976,608
|
|
|
|
3,776,608
|
|
Bruce Plastics, Inc. (1%)*
|
|
Plastic Component
Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 10/11)
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,371,527
|
|
|
|
1,371,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (12% of
common stock)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,480,061
|
|
|
|
1,371,527
|
|
CV Holdings, LLC (5%)*
|
|
Specialty
Healthcare Products
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16%, Due 03/10)
|
|
|
4,976,360
|
|
|
|
4,932,535
|
|
|
|
4,932,535
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,976,360
|
|
|
|
4,932,535
|
|
|
|
5,130,435
|
|
Cyrus Networks, LLC (6%)*
|
|
Data Center
Services Provider
|
|
Senior Note
(9%, Due 07/13)
|
|
|
4,382,257
|
|
|
|
4,364,705
|
|
|
|
4,364,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(12%, Due 01/14)
|
|
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of
Credit (9)%
|
|
|
70,880
|
|
|
|
70,880
|
|
|
|
70,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,360,800
|
|
|
|
5,343,248
|
|
|
|
5,343,248
|
|
DataPath, Inc. (1%)*
|
|
Satellite
Communication
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(210,263 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
576,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
576,400
|
|
F-11
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Eastern Shore Ambulance, Inc. (1%)*
|
|
Specialty Health
Care Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(13%, Due 03/11)
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
958,715
|
|
|
$
|
958,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (6% of
common stock)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,268
|
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
(30 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,043,983
|
|
|
|
968,015
|
|
Energy Hardware Holdings, LLC (4%)*
|
|
Machined Parts
Distribution
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14.5%, Due 10/12)
|
|
|
3,265,142
|
|
|
|
3,196,108
|
|
|
|
3,196,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated
Note
(8%, Due 10/12)
|
|
|
207,667
|
|
|
|
207,667
|
|
|
|
207,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,472,809
|
|
|
|
3,403,775
|
|
|
|
3,403,775
|
|
FCL Graphics, Inc. (8%)*
|
|
Commercial Printing
Services
|
|
Senior Note
(9%, Due 5/12)
|
|
|
1,920,000
|
|
|
|
1,912,331
|
|
|
|
1,912,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Note
(13%, Due 5/13)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,992,061
|
|
|
|
1,992,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(18%, Due 11/13)
|
|
|
3,145,481
|
|
|
|
3,133,096
|
|
|
|
3,133,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,065,481
|
|
|
|
7,037,488
|
|
|
|
7,037,488
|
|
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. (3%)*
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
Subordinated Notes
(13%17.5%, Due
04/11)
|
|
|
2,517,986
|
|
|
|
2,474,943
|
|
|
|
2,474,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (250
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
41,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,517,986
|
|
|
|
2,724,943
|
|
|
|
2,516,643
|
|
Flint Acquisition Corporation (5%)*
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12.5%, Due 09/09)
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
3,719,770
|
|
|
|
3,719,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
(9,875 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,333
|
|
|
|
1,074,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
4,028,103
|
|
|
|
4,793,870
|
|
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (4%)*
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
2nd Lien Note
(13%, Due 12/11)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(5,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
446,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,446,600
|
|
Gerli & Company (3%)*
|
|
Specialty Woven
Fabrics
Manufacturer
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 08/11)
|
|
|
3,114,063
|
|
|
|
3,017,205
|
|
|
|
3,017,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (56,559
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,414
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,114,063
|
|
|
|
3,100,619
|
|
|
|
3,101,705
|
|
Library Systems & Services, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Municipal Business
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(12%, Due 03/11)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,927,075
|
|
|
|
1,927,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
Warrants (112
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,995
|
|
|
|
594,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,986,070
|
|
|
|
2,521,375
|
|
F-12
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Syrgis Holdings, Inc. (6%)*
|
|
Specialty Chemical
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note (9%,
Due 08/12-2/14)
|
|
$
|
4,932,500
|
|
|
$
|
4,896,481
|
|
|
$
|
4,896,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units (2,114
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,932,500
|
|
|
|
5,896,481
|
|
|
|
5,896,481
|
|
Twin-Star International, Inc. (6%)*
|
|
Consumer Home
Furnishings
|
|
Subordinated Note
(13%, Due 04/14)
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
4,429,439
|
|
|
|
4,429,439
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Senior Note (8%,
Due 04/13)
|
|
|
1,492,500
|
|
|
|
1,492,500
|
|
|
|
1,492,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,992,500
|
|
|
|
5,921,939
|
|
|
|
5,921,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non Control / Non Affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,284,841
|
|
|
|
66,129,119
|
|
|
|
68,388,014
|
|
Affiliate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axxiom Manufacturing, Inc. (3%)*
|
|
Industrial Equipment
|
|
Subordinated Note
(14%, Due 01/11)
|
|
|
2,081,321
|
|
|
|
2,051,882
|
|
|
|
2,051,882
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
|
|
Common Stock
(34,100 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
543,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrant
(1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,081,321
|
|
|
|
2,251,882
|
|
|
|
2,607,682
|
|
Brantley Transportation, LLC (Brantley
Transportation) and Pine Street Holdings, LLC (Pine
Street)(4) (4%)*
|
|
Oil and Gas Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
Brantley
Transportation
(14%, Due 12/12)
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,670,336
|
|
|
|
3,670,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
Warrants
Brantley
Transportation
(4,560 common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
Pine Street (200
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
Warrants Pine
Street (2,220
units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800,000
|
|
|
|
3,903,936
|
|
|
|
3,903,936
|
|
Dyson Corporation (12%)*
|
|
Custom Forging and
Fastener
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 12/13)
|
|
|
10,009,167
|
|
|
|
9,789,167
|
|
|
|
9,789,167
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
|
Class A Units
(1,000,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,009,167
|
|
|
|
10,789,167
|
|
|
|
10,789,167
|
|
Equisales, LLC (7%)*
|
|
Energy Products and
Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(15%, Due 04/12)
|
|
|
6,129,723
|
|
|
|
6,014,677
|
|
|
|
6,014,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
(500,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,129,723
|
|
|
|
6,514,677
|
|
|
|
6,514,677
|
|
F-13
TRIANGLE
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Genapure Corporation (Genapure) and Genpref, LLC
(Genpref)(5)(1%)*
|
|
Lab Testing Services
|
|
Genapure Common
Stock (4,286
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
675,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genpref Preferred
Stock (455 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,602
|
|
|
|
85,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,602
|
|
|
|
761,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,020,211
|
|
|
|
24,023,264
|
|
|
|
24,576,462
|
|
Control Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARC Industries, LLC (3%)*
|
|
Remediation Services
|
|
Subordinated Note
(19%, Due 11/10)
|
|
|
2,403,521
|
|
|
|
2,373,358
|
|
|
|
2,373,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Units
(3,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
118,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403,521
|
|
|
|
2,548,358
|
|
|
|
2,492,058
|
|
Fischbein, LLC (14%)*
|
|
Packaging and
Materials Handling
|
|
Subordinated Note
(16.5%, Due 05/13)
|
|
|
8,660,723
|
|
|
|
8,507,806
|
|
|
|
8,507,806
|
|
|
|
Equipment
Manufacturer
|
|
Membership Units
(4,200,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,660,723
|
|
|
|
12,707,806
|
|
|
|
12,707,806
|
|
Porters Group, LLC (5%)*
|
|
Metal Fabrication
|
|
Membership Units
(4,730 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,254
|
|
|
|
4,871,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,254
|
|
|
|
4,871,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,064,244
|
|
|
|
15,727,418
|
|
|
|
20,071,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments,
December 31, 2007 (121%)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,369,296
|
|
|
$
|
105,879,801
|
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Value as a percent of net assets |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Common stock,
preferred stock and all warrants are non income
producing. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Interest rates on subordinated debt include cash interest rate
and, where applicable, paid in kind
interest rate. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
All investments are restricted as to resale and were valued at
fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Pine Street Holdings, LLC is the majority owner of Brantley
Transportation, LLC and its sole business purpose is its
ownership of Brantley Transportation, LLC. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Genpref is the sole owner of Genapures preferred stock and
its sole business purpose is its ownership of Genapures
preferred stock. |
See accompanying notes.
F-14
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
Organization,
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Organization
Triangle Capital Corporation (the Company), was
formed on October 10, 2006 for the purposes of acquiring
100% of the equity interest in Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP
(the Fund) and its general partner, Triangle
Mezzanine LLC (TML), raising capital in an initial
public offering, which was completed in February 2007 (the
IPO) and thereafter operating as an internally
managed Business Development Company (BDC) under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act).
The Fund is a specialty finance limited liability limited
partnership formed to make investments primarily in middle
market companies located throughout the United States. The
Funds term is ten years from the date of formation
(August 14, 2002) unless terminated earlier or
extended in accordance with provisions of the limited
partnership agreement. On September 11, 2003, the Fund was
licensed to operate as a Small Business Investment Company
(SBIC) under the authority of the United States Small Business
Administration (SBA). As a SBIC, the Fund is subject to a
variety of regulations concerning, among other things, the size
and nature of the companies in which it may invest and the
structure of those investments.
On February 21, 2007, concurrent with the closing of the
IPO, the following formation transactions were consummated (the
Formation Transactions):
|
|
|
|
|
The Company acquired 100% of the limited partnership interests
in the Fund in exchange for approximately 1.9 million
shares of the Companys common stock. The Fund became a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, retained its license
under the authority of the United States Small Business
Administrations (SBA) to operate as a Small Business
Investment Company (SBIC) and continues to hold its
existing investments and make new investments with the proceeds
of the IPO; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company acquired 100% of the equity interests in TML, and
the management agreement between the Fund and Triangle Capital
Partners, LLC was terminated.
|
The IPO consisted of the sale of 4,770,000 shares of Common
Stock at a price of $15 per share, resulting in net proceeds of
approximately $64.7 million, after deducting offering costs
totaling approximately $6.8 million. Upon completion of the
IPO, the Company had 6,686,760 common shares outstanding.
As a result of completion of the IPO and formation transactions,
the Fund became a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
The General partner of the Fund is the New General Partner
(which is wholly owned by the Company) and the limited partners
of the Fund are the Company (99.9%) and the New General Partner
(0.1%).
The Company currently operates as a closed - end,
non - diversified investment company and has elected to be
treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The Company is internally
managed by its executive officers (previously employed by the
Funds external manager) under the supervision of its board
of directors. For all periods subsequent to the consummation of
the IPO and the Formation Transactions, the Company does not pay
management or advisory fees, but instead incurs the operating
costs associated with employing executive management and
investment and portfolio management professionals.
Basis of
Presentation
The financial statements of the Company include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including the
Fund. The Fund does not consolidate portfolio company
investments.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The Formation Transactions discussed above
involved an exchange of shares of the Companys common
stock between companies under common control. In accordance with
the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under
common control contained in Statement of Financial
F-15
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), the Companys results of
operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2007 are presented as if the Formation Transactions had occurred
as of January 1, 2007. In addition, in accordance with
SFAS 141, the results of the Companys operations and
its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 have
been presented on a combined basis in order to provide
comparative information with respect to prior periods. The
effects of all intercompany transactions between the Company and
its subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation/combination. All financial data and information
included in these financial statements have been presented on
the basis described above.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Valuation
of Investments
The Company has established and documented processes and
methodologies for determining the fair values of portfolio
company investments on a recurring basis in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
Under SFAS 157, a financial instruments
categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy established
by SFAS 157 are defined as follows:
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology
are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology
are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company invests primarily in debt and equity of privately
held companies for which quoted prices falling within the
categories of Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are not
available. Therefore, the Company values all of its investments
at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors (Level 3 inputs, as further described below). Due
to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, the Board
of Directors estimate of fair value may differ
significantly from the values that would have been used had a
ready market for the securities existed, and the differences
could be material. In addition, changes in the market
environment and other events that may occur over the life of the
investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on
these investments to be different than the valuations currently
assigned.
Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded and for
which a limited market does not exist are valued at fair value
as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. There is
no single standard for determining fair value in good faith, as
fair value depends upon circumstances of each individual case.
In general, fair value is the amount that the Company might
reasonably expect to receive upon the current sale of the
security.
Management evaluates the investments in portfolio companies
using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and
forecasts. Management also consults with the portfolio
companys senior management
F-16
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
to obtain further updates on the portfolio companys
performance, including information such as industry trends, new
product development and other operational issues.
In making the good faith determination of the value of debt
securities, the Company starts with the cost basis of the
security, which includes the amortized original issue discount,
and payment-in-kind (PIK) interest, if any. The Company also
uses a risk rating system to estimate the probability of default
on the debt securities and the probability of loss if there is a
default. The risk rating system covers both qualitative and
quantitative aspects of the business and the securities held. In
valuing debt securities, management utilizes an income
approach model that considers factors including, but not
limited to, (i) the portfolio investments current
risk rating (discussed below), (ii) the portfolio
companys current trailing twelve months
(TTM) results of operations as compared to the
portfolio companys TTM results of operations as of the
date the investment was made, (iii) the portfolio
companys current leverage as compared to its leverage as
of the date the investment was made, and (iv) current
pricing and credit metrics for similar proposed and executed
investment transactions. In valuing equity securities of private
companies, the Company considers valuation methodologies
consistent with industry practice, including (i) valuation
using a valuation model based on original transaction multiples
and the portfolio companys recent financial performance,
(ii) valuation of the securities based on recent sales in
comparable transactions, and (iii) a review of similar
companies that are publicly traded and the market multiple of
their equity securities.
Duff & Phelps, LLC (Duff &
Phelps), an independent valuation firm, provides third
party valuation consulting services to the Company which consist
of certain limited procedures that the Company identified and
requested Duff & Phelps to perform (hereinafter
referred to as the procedures). We generally request
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on each
portfolio company at least once in every calendar year and for
new portfolio companies, at least once in the twelve-month
period subsequent to the initial investment. In certain
instances, we may determine that it is not cost-effective, and
as a result is not in our stockholders best interest, to
request Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on one
or more portfolio companies. Such instances include, but are not
limited to, situations where the fair value of our investment in
the portfolio company is determined to be insignificant relative
to our total investment portfolio.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in five portfolio companies comprising approximately 26% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of March 31,
2007. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company
asked Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on
investments in five portfolio companies comprising approximately
28% of the total investments at fair value (exclusive of the
fair value of new investments made during the quarter) as of
June 30, 2007. For the quarter ended September 30,
2007, the Company asked Duff & Phelps to perform the
procedures on investments in five portfolio companies comprising
approximately 29% of the total investments at fair value
(exclusive of the fair value of new investments made during the
quarter) as of September 30, 2007. For the quarter ended
December 31, 2007, the Company asked Duff &
Phelps to perform the procedures on investments in six portfolio
companies comprising approximately 23% of the total investments
at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of new investments
made during the quarter) as of December 31, 2007. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in six portfolio companies comprising approximately 35% of the
total investments at fair value (exclusive of the fair value of
new investments made during the quarter) as of March 31,
2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company
asked Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on
investments in five portfolio companies comprising approximately
18% of the total investments at fair value (exclusive of the
fair value of new investments made during the quarter) as of
June 30, 2008. For the quarter ended September 30,
2008, the Company asked Duff & Phelps to perform the
procedures on investments in eight portfolio companies
comprising approximately 29% of the total investments at fair
value (exclusive of the fair value of new investments made
during the quarter) as of September 30, 2008. For the
quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company asked
Duff & Phelps to perform the procedures on investments
in eight portfolio companies
F-17
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
comprising approximately 34% of the total investments at fair
value (exclusive of the fair value of new investments made
during the quarter) as of December 31, 2008. Upon
completion of the procedures, Duff & Phelps concluded
that the fair value, as determined by the Board of Directors, of
those investments subjected to the procedures did not appear to
be unreasonable. The Board of Directors of Triangle Capital
Corporation is ultimately and solely responsible for determining
the fair value of the Companys investments in good faith.
Warrants
When originating a debt security, the Company will sometimes
receive warrants or other equity-related securities from the
borrower. The Company determines the cost basis of the warrants
or other equity-related securities received based upon their
respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to
the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other
equity - related securities received. Any resulting
difference between the face amount of the debt and its recorded
fair value resulting from the assignment of value to the warrant
or other equity instruments is treated as original issue
discount and accreted into interest income over the life of the
loan.
Realized
Gain or Loss and Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation of
Portfolio Investments
Realized gains or losses are recorded upon the sale or
liquidation of investments and calculated as the difference
between the net proceeds from the sale or liquidation, if any,
and the cost basis of the investment using the specific
identification method. Unrealized appreciation or depreciation
reflects the difference between the valuation of the investments
and the cost basis of the investments.
Investment
Classification
In accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Company
classifies investments by level of control. As defined in the
1940 Act, Control Investments are investments in
those companies that the Company is deemed to
Control. Affiliate Investments are
investments in those companies that are Affiliated
Companies of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act,
other than Control Investments.
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
Investments are those that are neither Control Investments
nor Affiliate Investments. Generally, under the 1940 Act, the
Company is deemed to control a company in which it has invested
if the Company owns more than 25.0% of the voting securities of
such company or has greater than 50.0% representation on its
board. The Company is deemed to be an affiliate of a company in
which the Company has invested if it owns between 5.0% and 25.0%
of the voting securities of such company.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less at the date of
purchase to be cash equivalents.
Deferred
Financing Fees
Costs incurred to obtain long-term debt are capitalized and are
amortized over the term of the debt agreements using the
effective interest method.
Depreciation
Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years.
Software and computer equipment are depreciated over an
estimated useful life of three years.
F-18
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
Investment
Income
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual
basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected. Generally, when interest
and/or
principal payments on a loan become past due, or if the Company
otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its
debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on
non-accrual status and will generally cease recognizing interest
income on that loan until all principal and interest has been
brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such
that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. The
Company writes off any previously accrued and uncollected
interest when it is determined that interest is no longer
considered collectible. Dividend income is recorded on the
ex-dividend date.
Fee
Income
Loan origination, facility, commitment, consent and other
advance fees received in connection with loan agreements are
recorded as deferred income and recognized as income over the
term of the loan. Loan prepayment penalties and loan amendment
fees are recorded into income when received. Any previously
deferred fees are immediately recorded into income upon
prepayment of the related loan.
Payment
in Kind Interest
The Company holds loans in its portfolio that contain a
payment-in-kind (PIK) interest provision. The PIK
interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each
loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan
and is recorded as interest income. To maintain the
Companys status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income
must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even
though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Generally,
when current cash interest
and/or
principal payments on a loan become past due, or if the Company
otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its
debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on
non-accrual status and will generally cease recognizing PIK
interest income on that loan until all principal and interest
has been brought current through payment or due to a
restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be
collectible. The Company writes off any accrued and uncollected
PIK interest when it is determined that the PIK interest is no
longer collectible.
Management
Fee
Prior to the consummation of the Formation Transactions, the
Fund was managed by Triangle Capital Partners, LLC, a related
party that was majority-owned by three members of the
Companys management, including the Companys Chief
Executive Officer. Triangle Capital Partners, LLC was entitled
to a quarterly management fee, which was payable at an annual
rate of 2.5% of total aggregate subscriptions of all
institutional partners and capital available from the SBA.
Payments of the management fee were made quarterly in advance.
Certain direct expenses such as legal, audit, tax and limited
partner expense were the responsibility of the Fund. The
management fee for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 was $232,423 and $1,589,070, respectively. In conjunction
with the consummation of the Formation Transactions in February
2007, the management agreement was terminated.
Income
Taxes
From the date of its formation, October 10, 2006 through
December 31, 2006, Triangle Capital Corporation was taxed
under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code. Prior to the
consummation of the Formation Transactions, Triangle Mezzanine
Fund LLLP recorded no provision for income taxes in its
financial statements because all income, deductions, gains,
losses, and credits were reported in the tax returns of the
partners.
F-19
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
For all periods subsequent to February 21, 2007, the
Company intends to elect to be treated as a Regulated Investment
Company (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Code. As a
RIC, so long as the Company meets certain minimum distribution,
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements, it generally is required
to pay income taxes only on the portion of its taxable income
and gains it does not distribute (actually or constructively)
and certain built-in gains.
In addition, the company has certain wholly owned taxable
subsidiaries (the Taxable Subsidiaries), each of
which holds one or more of its portfolio investments that are
listed on the Consolidated Schedule of Investments. The Taxable
Subsidiaries are consolidated for GAAP purposes, such that the
companys consolidated financial statements reflect the
Companys investments in the portfolio companies owned by
the Taxable Subsidiaries. The purpose of the Taxable
Subsidiaries is to permit the Company to hold portfolio
companies that are organized as limited liability companies
(LLCs) (or other forms of pass - through
entities) and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at
least 90% of the RICs gross revenue for income tax
purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable
Subsidiaries, a proportionate amount of any gross income of an
LLC (or other pass - through entity) portfolio investment
would flow through directly to the RIC. To the extent that such
income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize
the Companys ability to qualify as a RIC and therefore
cause the Company to incur significant amounts of federal income
taxes. Where the LLCs (or other pass-through entities) are owned
by the Taxable Subsidiaries, however, their income is taxed to
the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to the RIC,
thereby helping the Company preserve its RIC status and
resultant tax advantages. The Taxable Subsidiaries are not
consolidated for income tax purposes and may generate income tax
expense as a result of their ownership of the portfolio
companies. This income tax expense is reflected in the
Companys Statements of Operations.
Segments
The Company lends to and invests in customers in various
industries. The Company separately evaluates the performance of
each of its lending and investment relationships. However,
because each of these loan and investment relationships has
similar business and economic characteristics, they have been
aggregated into a single lending and investment segment. All
applicable segment disclosures are included in or can be derived
from the Companys financial statements.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The Companys investees are generally lower middle-market
companies in a variety of industries. At December 31, 2008,
there were no individual investments greater than 10% of the
fair value of the Companys portfolio. At December 31,
2007, the Company had one investment that was individually
greater than or equal to 10% of the total fair value of its
investment portfolio. This investment represented approximately
11% of the total fair value of the Companys investment
portfolio. Income, consisting of interest, dividends, fees,
other investment income, and realization of gains or losses on
equity interests, can fluctuate dramatically upon repayment of
an investment or sale of an equity interest and in any given
year can be highly concentrated among several investees.
The Companys investments carry a number of risks
including, but not limited to: 1) investing in lower middle
market companies which have a limited operating history and
financial resources; 2) investing in senior subordinated
debt which ranks equal to or lower than debt held by other
investors; 3) holding investments that are not publicly
traded and are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale
and other risks common to investing in below investment grade
debt and equity instruments.
Dividends
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are approved
by the Companys Board of Directors and the dividend
payable is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
F-20
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan
(DRIP) that provides for reinvestment of dividends
on behalf of its shareholders, unless a shareholder elects to
receive cash. As a result, when the Company declares a dividend,
shareholders who have not opted out of the DRIP will have their
dividends automatically reinvested in shares of the
Companys common stock, rather than receiving cash
dividends.
On May 9, 2007, the Company declared a dividend of $0.15
per common share, payable on June 28, 2007 to shareholders
of record on May 31, 2007. The total amount of the dividend
was approximately $1.0 million, of which approximately
$358,000 was paid in cash and approximately $645,000 was
reinvested in new shares of the Companys common stock.
On August 8, 2007, the Company declared a dividend of $0.26
per common share, payable on September 27, 2007 to
shareholders of record on August 30, 2007. The total amount
of the dividend was approximately $1.75 million, of which
approximately $769,000 was paid in cash and approximately
$981,000 was reinvested in new shares of the Companys
common stock.
On November 7, 2007, the Company declared a dividend of
$0.27 per common share, payable on December 27, 2007 to
shareholders of record on November 29, 2007. The total
amount of the dividend was approximately $1.84 million, all
of which was paid in cash.
On December 14, 2007, the Company declared a dividend of
$0.30 per common share, payable on January 28, 2008 to
shareholders of record on December 31, 2007. The total
amount of the dividend was approximately $2.04 million and
is reflected as dividends payable in the Companys
financial statements as of December 31, 2007.
On May 7, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of $0.31
per common share, payable on June 26, 2008 to shareholders
of record on June 5, 2008. The total amount of the dividend
was approximately $2.14 million, all of which was paid in
cash.
On July 21, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of $0.35
per common share, payable on September 4, 2008 to
shareholders of record on August 14, 2008. The total amount
of the dividend was approximately $2.42 million, all of
which was paid in cash.
On October 9, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of
$0.38 per common share, payable on November 20, 2008 to
shareholders of record on October 30, 2008. The total
amount of the dividend was approximately $2.63 million, all
of which was paid in cash.
On December 7, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of
$0.40 per common share, payable on January 6, 2009 to
shareholders of record on December 23, 2008. The total
amount of the dividend was approximately $2.77 million and
is reflected as dividends payable in the Companys
financial statements as of December 31, 2008.
Allocations
and Distributions of the Fund
During 2006, the Fund distributed $5,000,010 in cash to the
former limited partners of the Fund and recorded a partners
distribution payable of $531,566 to the former General Partner,
which was distributed in the first quarter of 2007. In addition,
in the second quarter of 2007, the Fund distributed $220,047 in
cash to the former General Partner and former limited partners
of the Fund.
Per
Share Amounts
Per share amounts included in the Statements of Operations are
computed by dividing net investment income and net increase in
net assets resulting from operations by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. As
the Company has no common stock equivalents outstanding,
F-21
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
diluted per share amounts are the same as basic per share
amounts. Net asset value per share is computed by dividing total
net assets by the number of common shares outstanding as of the
end of the period.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The changes to previous practice resulting from
the application of SFAS 157 relate to the definition of
fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The
definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion used
in earlier definitions of fair value. SFAS 157 clarifies
that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction
between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the
liability in the market in which the reporting entity would
transact for the asset or liability, that is, the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The
transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability is a
hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered
from the perspective of a market participant that holds the
asset or owes the liability. SFAS 157 provides a consistent
definition of fair value which focuses on exit price and
prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In addition,
SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements
based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability as of the measurement date. The
Companys adoption of SFAS 157 resulted in additional
unrealized depreciation of approximately $0.2 million in
the three months ended March 31, 2008.
As described above, effective January 1, 2008, the Company
adopted SFAS 157 for its financial assets. The Company has
changed its balance sheet presentation for all periods to
reclassify deferred loan origination revenue to the associated
debt investments. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 157, the
Company reported deferred loan origination revenue as a single
line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This change in
presentation had no impact on the aggregate net cost or fair
value of the Companys investment portfolio and had no
impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
F-22
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
Summaries of the composition of the Companys investment
portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total
investments are shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt and
2nd lien
notes
|
|
$
|
147,493,871
|
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
$
|
143,015,291
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
Senior debt
|
|
|
16,269,628
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16,269,628
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Equity shares
|
|
|
13,684,269
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
17,301,372
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
1,829,370
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4,644,600
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,151,538
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt and
2nd lien
notes
|
|
$
|
80,902,982
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
$
|
80,902,982
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Senior debt
|
|
|
14,728,958
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14,728,958
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Equity shares
|
|
|
9,699,689
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15,335,900
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
548,172
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,870,500
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Royalty rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,879,801
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company made
twelve new investments totaling $91.0 million, additional
debt investments in an existing portfolio company of
$1.9 million and four additional equity investments in
existing portfolio companies totaling approximately
$0.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
the Company made nine new investments totaling
$62.2 million, one additional debt investment in an
existing portfolio company of $1.9 million and one
additional equity investment in an existing portfolio company of
approximately $0.1 million. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company made nine new investments
totaling $21.5 million.
The following table presents the Companys financial
instruments carried at fair value as of December 31, 2008,
on the consolidated balance sheet by SFAS 157 valuation
hierarchy, as previously described:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portfolio company investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances
of our portfolio company investments measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
113,036,240
|
|
New investments
|
|
|
93,054,022
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
(3,631,876
|
)
|
Loan origination fees received
|
|
|
(1,686,996
|
)
|
Principal repayments received
|
|
|
(17,336,521
|
)
|
Payment in kind interest earned
|
|
|
3,761,786
|
|
Payment in kind interest payments received
|
|
|
(1,978,498
|
)
|
Accretion of loan discounts
|
|
|
169,548
|
|
Accretion of deferred loan origination revenue
|
|
|
484,664
|
|
Realized gains on investments
|
|
|
1,435,608
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
(5,202,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of portfolio, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
182,105,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in
earnings (changes in net assets) and are reported on separate
line items within the Companys statements of operations.
Pre-tax net unrealized losses on investments of
$0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2008
are related to portfolio company investments that are still held
by the Company as of December 31, 2008.
F-24
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company has the following debentures outstanding guaranteed
by the SBA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Issuance/Pooling Date
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Return Rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
September 22, 2004
|
|
September 1, 2014
|
|
|
5.539
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,700,000
|
|
March 23, 2005
|
|
March 1, 2015
|
|
|
5.893
|
%
|
|
|
13,600,000
|
|
|
|
13,600,000
|
|
September 28, 2005
|
|
September 1, 2015
|
|
|
5.796
|
%
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,500,000
|
|
February 1, 2007
|
|
March 1, 2017
|
|
|
6.231
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
March 26, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.191
|
%
|
|
|
6,410,000
|
|
|
|
1,210,000
|
|
March 27, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.580
|
%
|
|
|
4,840,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 11, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
9,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 28, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
15,160,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 11, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2008
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
6.442
|
%
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
4.545
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 28, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
4.099
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
4.099
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
3.861
|
%
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2008
|
|
March 1, 2019
|
|
|
3.861
|
%
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,110,000
|
|
|
$
|
37,010,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments are payable semi-annually. There are no
principal payments required on these issues prior to maturity.
Debentures issued prior to September 2006 were subject to
prepayment penalties during their first five years. Those
pre-payment penalties no longer apply to debentures issued after
September 1, 2006.
Under the Small Business Investment Act and current SBA policy
applicable to SBICs, an SBIC (or group of SBICs under common
control) can have outstanding at any time SBA guaranteed
debentures up to twice the amount of its regulatory capital. As
of December 31, 2008, the maximum statutory limit on the
dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by
a single SBIC is $137.1 million (which amount is subject to
an annual inflation adjustment). Under the provisions of the
recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
the Companys maximum borrowing under the SBA-guaranteed
debenture program has been increased to $150 million. With
$65.3 million of regulatory capital as of December 31,
2008, the Fund has the current capacity to issue up to a total
of $130.6 million of SBA guaranteed debentures. In addition
to the one - time 1.0% fee on the total commitment from the
SBA, the Company also pays a one-time 2.425% fee on the amount
of each debenture issued. These fees are capitalized as deferred
financing costs and are amortized over the term of the debt
agreements using the effective interest method. The weighted
average interest rates for all SBA guaranteed debentures as of
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were 5.811%
and 5.826%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate as
of December 31, 2008 includes $93.1 million of pooled
SBA-guaranteed debentures with a weighted average fixed interest
rate of 6.19% and $22.0 million of unpooled SBA-guaranteed
debentures with a weighted average interim interest rate of
4.19%.
F-25
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
During 2008, the Company entered into an uncommitted short-term
offering basis loan agreement with a financial institution (the
Loan Agreement) under which the financial
institution may make loans to the Company in amounts not
exceeding $15.0 million in the aggregate. The term of any
advances made under the Loan Agreement may not exceed
45 days and bear interest at LIBOR plus 275 basis
points. As of December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the Loan Agreement.
From the date of its formation, October 10, 2006 up to
December 31, 2006, Triangle Capital Corporation was taxed
under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code. Prior to the
consummation of the Formation Transactions, Triangle Mezzanine
Fund LLLP recorded no provision for income taxes in its
financial statements because all income, deductions, gains,
losses, and credits were reported in the tax returns of the
partners.
For all periods subsequent to February 21, 2007, the
Company intends to elect to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter
M of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Provided
the Company continues to qualify as a RIC, its income generally
will not be subject to federal income or excise tax to the
extent it makes the requisite distributions to stockholders.
To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to meet certain
income and asset diversification tests in addition to
distributing at least 90% of its investment company taxable
income, as defined by the Code. Because federal income tax
regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax
regulations may differ from net investment income and realized
gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences
may be permanent or temporary in nature. Permanent differences
are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial
statements to reflect their tax character. Differences in
classification may also result from the treatment of short-term
gains as ordinary income for tax purposes. During the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company reclassified
for book purposes amounts arising from permanent book/tax
differences primarily related to differences in the tax basis
and book basis of investments sold during the year as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
612,399
|
|
Investment income in excess of distributions
|
|
$
|
(151,906
|
)
|
Accumulated realized gains on investments
|
|
$
|
(460,493
|
)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in excess of distributions
|
|
$
|
649,856
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
(649,856
|
)
|
For income tax purposes, distributions paid to shareholders are
reported as ordinary income, return of capital, long term
capital gains or a combination thereof. The tax character of
distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income(a)
|
|
$
|
9,817,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions on a Tax Basis
|
|
$
|
9,817,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income(a)
|
|
$
|
5,993,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions on a Tax Basis
|
|
$
|
5,993,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Ordinary income is reported on
form 1099-DIV
as non-qualified. |
F-26
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
For federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments owned
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $181.2 and
$107.3 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the components of
distributable earnings on a tax basis detailed below differ from
the amounts reflected in the Companys Statement of Assets
and Liabilities by temporary and other book/tax differences,
primarily relating to depreciation expense, stock-based
compensation, accruals of defaulted debt investment interest and
the tax treatment of certain partnership investments, as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income
|
|
$
|
634,803
|
|
Accumulated Capital Gains
|
|
|
356,495
|
|
Other permanent differences relating to the Companys
Formation
|
|
|
1,975,543
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
(317,111
|
)
|
Unrealized Appreciation
|
|
|
931,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Distributable Earnings at December, 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,581,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Capital Losses
|
|
$
|
(618,620
|
)
|
Other permanent differences relating to the Companys
Formation
|
|
|
1,834,692
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
34,166
|
|
Unrealized Appreciation
|
|
|
5,266,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Distributable Earnings at December, 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,516,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Company utilized net capital loss carryforwards
of $618,620.
|
|
5.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan
|
The Companys Board of Directors and stockholders have
approved the Triangle Capital Corporation Amended and Restated
2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), under which
there are 900,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock
authorized for issuance. Under the Plan, the Board (or
compensation committee, if delegated administrative authority by
the Board) may award stock options, restricted stock or other
stock based incentive awards to executive officers, employees
and directors. The terms of equity-based awards granted under
the Plan generally will vest ratably over one- to four-year
periods.
The Company accounts for its equity-based compensation plan
using the fair value method, as prescribed by Statement of
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. Accordingly, for restricted stock awards, we
measure the grant date fair value based upon the market price of
our common stock on the date of the grant and amortize this fair
value to compensation expense over the requisite service period
or vesting term.
On May 7, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
granted 113,500 restricted shares of our common stock to certain
employees and independent directors. These restricted shares had
a total grant date fair value of approximately
$1.3 million, which will be expensed on a straight-line
basis over each respective awards vesting period. In the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized
equity-based compensation expense of approximately
$0.3 million. This expense is included in general and
administrative expenses in the Companys consolidated
statements of operations. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company has a total of 113,500 restricted shares outstanding.
As of December 31, 2008, there was approximately
$1.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost,
related to the Companys non-vested restricted shares. This
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of approximately 3.0 years.
F-27
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In the normal course of business, the Company is party to
financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, consisting
primarily of unused commitments to extend credit, in the form of
loans, to the Companys portfolio companies. The balance of
unused commitments to extend credit as of December 31, 2008
was approximately $0.3 million. Since these commitments may
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount
does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The Companys headquarters is leased under an agreement
that expires on December 31, 2013. Rent expense for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately
$122,000 and $98,000, respectively, and the rent commitment for
the five years ending December 31, 2013 are as follows:
2009 - $275,124, 2010 - $281,409, 2011 -
$287,805, 2012 - $294,531, 2013 - $301,368.
F-28
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period(2)
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net investment income(3)
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments(3)
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(3)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase from investment operations(3)
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
(1.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to Dividend Reinvestment Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Distribution to partners(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income tax provision(3)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Other(4)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value at end of period(5)
|
|
$
|
10.20
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
|
|
6,803,863
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
91,514,982
|
|
|
$
|
93,472,353
|
|
|
$
|
25,156,811
|
|
|
$
|
11,364,547
|
|
|
$
|
5,003,825
|
|
Average net assets(2)
|
|
$
|
94,584,281
|
|
|
$
|
92,765,399
|
|
|
$
|
20,447,456
|
|
|
$
|
7,654,010
|
|
|
$
|
5,104,796
|
|
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Ratio of total capital called to total capital commitments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Portfolio turnover ratio
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Total return(6)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
%)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share data for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
and 2004 is not presented as there were no shares of Triangle
Capital Corporation outstanding during the period. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Average net assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 are
presented as if the IPO and Formation Transactions had occurred
on January 1, 2007. See Note 1 for a further
description of the basis of presentation of the Companys
financial statements. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Weighted average basic per share data. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the impact of the different share amounts used in
calculating per share data as a result of calculating certain
per share data based upon the weighted average basic shares
outstanding during the period and certain per share data based
on the shares outstanding as of a period end or transaction date. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents the closing price of the Companys common stock
on the last day of the period. |
F-29
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Notes to
Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The total return for the year ended December 31, 2008
equals the change in the ending market value of the
Companys common stock during the period, plus dividends
declared per share during the period, divided by the market
value of the Companys common stock on the first day of the
period. The total return for the year ended December 31,
2007 equals the change in the ending market value of the
Companys common stock from the IPO price of $15.00 per
share plus dividends declared per share during the period,
divided by the IPO price. Total return is not annualized. |
|
|
8.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
The following tables set forth certain quarterly financial
information for each of the eight quarters in the two years
ended December 31, 2008. Results for any quarter are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any
future quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
3,863,984
|
|
|
$
|
5,020,091
|
|
|
$
|
5,869,637
|
|
|
$
|
6,605,786
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1,913,695
|
|
|
|
2,542,442
|
|
|
|
3,211,706
|
|
|
|
2,954,435
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
765,391
|
|
|
|
2,848,507
|
|
|
|
2,476,346
|
|
|
|
1,548,257
|
|
Net investment income per share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
2,112,116
|
|
|
$
|
3,287,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,594,287
|
|
|
$
|
3,742,216
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
804,730
|
|
|
|
1,643,998
|
|
|
|
1,992,001
|
|
|
|
1,982,480
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
1,065,835
|
|
|
|
2,230,084
|
|
|
|
3,366,681
|
|
|
|
2,150,498
|
|
Net investment income per share
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
On February 6, 2009, the Company invested an additional
$3.8 million in the subordinated debt of Inland Pipe
Rehabilitation (Inland Pipe), a provider of
maintenance, inspection and repair services for piping, sewers,
drains and storm lines. Under the terms of the investment,
Inland Pipe will pay interest on the subordinated debt at a
fixed rate of 18% per annum.
F-30
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated April , 2009)
Shares
Common Stock
$ per share
We are
offering shares
of our common stock to fund investments in lower middle market
companies in accordance with our investment objective and
strategies and for working capital and general corporate
purposes. These shares are being offered at a discount from our
most recently determined net asset value per share pursuant to
authority granted by our stockholders at the annual meeting of
stockholders held on May 7, 2008. Sales of common stock at
prices below net asset value per share dilute the interests of
existing stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset
value per share and may reduce our market price per share. See
Risk Factors beginning on
page S-
and Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value on
page S-
of this prospectus supplement and on page of the
accompanying prospectus.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol TCAP. The last reported sale price on
April , 2009 was
$ per share, and our most recently
determined net asset value per share was
$ .
Please read this prospectus supplement, and the accompanying
prospectus, before investing, and keep it for future reference.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
contain important information about us that a prospective
investor should know before investing in our common stock. We
file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and
other information about us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This information is available free of charge by
contacting us at 3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27612, or by telephone by calling collect at
(919) 719-4770
or on our website at www.tcap.com. The information on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus. The SEC also
maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such
information.
Investing in our common stock is speculative and involves
numerous risks, and you could lose your entire investment if any
of the risks occurs. For more information regarding these risks,
please see Risk Factors beginning on
page S-
of this prospectus supplement and on page of
the accompanying prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission, nor any other regulatory body, has
approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if
either this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus
is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount (sales load)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us before expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Before deducting estimated expenses payable by us of
approximately $ .
|
The date of this prospectus supplement
is
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
S-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This document is in two parts. The first part is the prospectus
supplement, which describes the specific terms of the common
stock we are offering and certain other matters relating to us.
The second part, the accompanying prospectus, gives more general
information about the common stock which we may offer from time
to time, some of which may not apply to the common stock offered
by this prospectus supplement. For information about our common
stock, see Description of Our Securities in the
accompanying prospectus.
If the description of the offering varies between this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you
should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement.
The information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement supersedes any inconsistent information
included or incorporated by reference in the accompanying
prospectus. In various places in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus, we refer you to other sections of
such documents for additional information by indicating the
caption heading of such other sections. The page on which each
principal caption included in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus can be found is listed in the table of
contents above. All such cross references in this prospectus
supplement are to captions contained in this prospectus
supplement and not in the accompanying prospectus, unless
otherwise stated.
Unless we have indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise
requires, references in this prospectus supplement to
$ or dollar are to the lawful currency
of the United States.
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE
ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS. WE HAVE NOT, AND THE UNDERWRITER HAS
NOT, AUTHORIZED ANY OTHER PERSON TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DIFFERENT
OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IF ANYONE PROVIDES YOU WITH DIFFERENT
OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON IT. WE ARE
NOT, AND THE UNDERWRITER IS NOT, MAKING AN OFFER TO SELL THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT
PERMITTED. YOU SHOULD ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION APPEARING IN
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT, THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS AND ANY
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IS ACCURATE ONLY AS OF THEIR
RESPECTIVE DATES, REGARDLESS OF THE TIME OF DELIVERY OF THIS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS OR ANY
SALES OF THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL
CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND PROSPECTS MAY HAVE CHANGED
SINCE THOSE DATES.
iii
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. It is not
complete and may not contain all of the information that you may
want to consider. To understand the terms of the common stock
offered hereby, you should read the entire prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus carefully. Together, these
documents describe the specific terms of the shares we are
offering. You should carefully read the sections titled
Risk Factors, Selected Consolidated Financial
and Other Data, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the financial statements contained elsewhere in the
accompanying prospectus, as well as the Risk Factors
section and the documents identified in the section
Available Information in this prospectus
supplement.
Triangle Capital Corporation is a Maryland corporation
incorporated on October 10, 2006, for the purpose of
acquiring Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP, or Triangle SBIC,
and its general partner, Triangle Mezzanine LLC, or TML, raising
capital in its Initial Public Offering, or IPO, which closed on
February 21, 2007 and, thereafter, operating as an
internally managed business development company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act.
Triangle SBIC is licensed as a small business investment
company, or SBIC, by the United States Small Business
Administration, or SBA. Simultaneously with the consummation of
our IPO, we acquired all of the equity interests in Triangle
SBIC and TML as described elsewhere in the accompanying
prospectus under Formation Transactions, whereby
Triangle SBIC became our wholly owned subsidiary. Unless
otherwise noted in this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus, the terms we,
us, our and Triangle refer
to Triangle SBIC prior to the IPO and to Triangle Capital
Corporation and its subsidiaries currently existing.
Triangle
Capital Corporation
Triangle Capital Corporation is a specialty finance company that
provides customized financing solutions to lower middle market
companies located throughout the United States. We define lower
middle market companies as those having annual revenues between
$10.0 and $100.0 million. Our investment objective is to
seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments. Our investment philosophy is to partner
with business owners, management teams and financial sponsors to
provide flexible financing solutions to fund growth, changes of
control, or other corporate events. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt securities secured by first and
second lien security interests in portfolio company assets,
coupled with equity interests.
We focus on investments in companies with a history of
generating revenues and positive cash flows, an established
market position and a proven management team with a strong
operating discipline. Our target portfolio company has annual
revenues between $20.0 and $75.0 million and annual
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) between $2.0 and $20.0 million. We
believe that these companies have less access to capital and
that the market for such capital is underserved relative to
larger companies. Companies of this size are generally privately
held and are less well known to traditional capital sources such
as commercial and investment banks.
Our investments generally range from $5.0 to $15.0 million
per portfolio company. In certain situations, we have partnered
with other funds to provide larger financing commitments. We are
continuing to operate Triangle SBIC as an SBIC and to utilize
the proceeds of the sale of SBA guaranteed debentures, referred
to herein as SBA leverage, to enhance returns to our
stockholders. As of December 31, 2008, we had investments
in 34 portfolio companies, with an aggregate cost of
$180.2 million.
Our principal executive offices are located at 3700 Glenwood
Avenue, Suite 530, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, and our
telephone number is
919-719-4770.
We maintain a website on the Internet at www.tcap.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be
part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus.
S-1
Our
Business Strategy
We seek attractive returns by generating current income from our
debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
related investments by:
|
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Underserved Markets. We believe
that broad-based consolidation in the financial services
industry coupled with operating margin and growth pressures have
caused financial institutions to
de-emphasize
services to lower middle market companies in favor of larger
corporate clients and capital market transactions. We believe
these dynamics have resulted in the financing market for lower
middle market companies to be underserved, providing us with
greater investment opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Providing Customized Financing Solutions. We
offer a variety of financing structures and have the flexibility
to structure our investments to meet the needs of our portfolio
companies. Typically we invest in senior and subordinated debt
securities, coupled with equity interests. We believe our
ability to customize financing arrangements makes us an
attractive partner to lower middle market companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Experience of Our Management
Team. Our senior management team has more than
100 years of combined experience advising, investing in,
lending to and operating companies across changing market
cycles. The members of our management team have diverse
investment backgrounds, with prior experience at investment
banks, specialty finance companies, commercial banks, and
privately and publicly held companies in the capacity of
executive officers. We believe this diverse experience provides
us with an in depth understanding of the strategic, financial
and operational opportunities associated with lower middle
market companies. We believe this understanding allows us to
select and structure better investments and to efficiently
monitor and provide managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applying Rigorous Underwriting Policies and Active Portfolio
Management. Our senior management team has
implemented rigorous underwriting policies that are followed in
each transaction. These policies include a thorough analysis of
each potential portfolio companys competitive position,
financial performance, management team operating discipline,
growth potential and industry attractiveness, allowing us to
better assess the companys prospects. After investing in a
company, we monitor the investment closely, typically receiving
monthly, quarterly and annual financial statements. We analyze
and discuss in detail the companys financial performance
with management in addition to attending regular board of
directors meetings. We believe that our initial and ongoing
portfolio review process allows us to monitor effectively the
performance and prospects of our portfolio companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taking Advantage of Low Cost Debentures Guaranteed by the
SBA. Our license to do business as an SBIC allows
us to issue fixed-rate, low interest debentures which are
guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the capital markets,
potentially allowing us to increase our net interest income
beyond the levels achievable by other BDCs utilizing traditional
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Across Multiple Industries. While we
focus our investments in lower middle market companies, we seek
to invest across various industries. We monitor our investment
portfolio to ensure we have acceptable industry balance, using
industry and market metrics as key indicators. By monitoring our
investment portfolio for industry balance we seek to reduce the
effects of economic downturns associated with any particular
industry or market sector. However, we may from time to time
hold securities of a single portfolio company that comprise more
than 5.0% of our total assets
and/or more
than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio
company. For that reason, we are classified as a non-diversified
management investment company under the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizing Long-Standing Relationships to Source
Deals. Our senior management team maintains
extensive relationships with entrepreneurs, financial sponsors,
attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, commercial bankers
and other non-bank providers of capital who refer prospective
portfolio companies to us. These relationships historically have
generated significant investment opportunities. We believe that
our network of relationships will continue to produce attractive
investment opportunities.
|
S-2
Our
Investment Criteria
We utilize the following criteria and guidelines in evaluating
investment opportunities. However, not all of these criteria and
guidelines have been, or will be, met in connection with each of
our investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Established Companies With Positive Cash
Flow. We seek to invest in established companies
with a history of generating revenues and positive cash flows.
We typically focus on companies with a history of profitability
and minimum trailing twelve month EBITDA of $2.0 million.
We do not invest in
start-up
companies, distressed situations, turn-around
situations or companies that we believe have unproven business
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Teams With Meaningful Equity
Ownership. Based on our prior investment
experience, we believe that a management team with significant
experience with a portfolio company or relevant industry
experience and meaningful equity ownership is more committed to
a portfolio company. We believe management teams with these
attributes are more likely to manage the companies in a manner
that protects our debt investment and enhances the value of our
equity investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong Competitive Position. We seek to invest
in companies that have developed strong positions within their
respective markets, are well positioned to capitalize on growth
opportunities and compete in industries with barriers to entry.
We also seek to invest in companies that exhibit a competitive
advantage, which may help to protect their market position and
profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varied Customer and Supplier Base. We prefer
to invest in companies that have a varied customer and supplier
base. Companies with a varied customer and supplier base are
generally better able to endure economic downturns, industry
consolidation and shifting customer preferences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Invested Capital. We believe the
existence of significant underlying equity value provides
important support to investments. We will look for portfolio
companies that we believe have sufficient value beyond the layer
of the capital structure in which we invest.
|
Recent
Developments
In February 2009, we invested an additional $3.8 million in
subordinated debt of Inland Pipe Rehabilitation (Inland
Pipe), a provider of maintenance, inspection and repair
services for piping, sewers, drains and storm lines. Under the
terms of the investment, Inland Pipe will pay interest on the
subordinated debt at a fixed rate of 18.0% per annum.
In March 2009, we invested $5.2 million in Tulsa Inspection
Resources, Inc. (TIR), consisting of
$5.0 million in subordinated debt with warrants and
$0.2 million in equity. TIR is a leading independent
provider of pipeline inspection services for the oil and gas
industry. Under the terms of the investment, TIR will pay
interest on the subordinated debt at a fixed rate of 14.0% per
annum.
S-3
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering(1) |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect that the net proceeds from this offering will be
approximately $ million. |
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from selling our common stock
to make investments in lower middle market companies in
accordance with our investment objective and strategies and for
working capital and general corporate purposes. See Use of
Proceeds in this prospectus supplement for more
information. |
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
We typically pay quarterly dividends and may pay other
distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. Our dividends and other
distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of
directors. |
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
We have elected to be treated as a RIC. Accordingly, we
generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on
any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to
our stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC tax
treatment, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements and distribute annually at least
90.0% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. |
|
|
|
Risk Factors |
|
See the Risk Factors section beginning on
page S-
of this prospectus supplement and on page of
the accompanying prospectus. |
|
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
TCAP |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on 7,047,663 shares outstanding as
of April 13, 2009 and, unless we indicate otherwise,
excludes 656,200 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under our equity incentive plan. |
S-4
FEES AND
EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
our and Triangle SBICs consolidated costs and expenses
that an investor in this offering will bear directly or
indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages
indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except
where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus
supplement contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by
you, us or Triangle, or that
we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will
indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Transaction Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
6.61
|
%(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
11.35
|
%(5)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The underwriting discount with respect to our common stock sold
in this offering, which is a one-time fee, is the only sales
load paid in connection with this offering. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The offering expenses of this offering are estimated to be
approximately $ . |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are
included in Other expenses. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Other expenses represent our estimated annual operating
expenses, excluding interest payments on borrowed funds. We do
not have an investment adviser and are internally managed by our
executive officers under the supervision of our board of
directors. As a result, we do not pay investment advisory fees,
but instead we pay the operating costs associated with employing
investment management professionals. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The total annual expenses are the sum of interest payments on
borrowed funds and other expenses. Total annual
expenses as a percentage of average net assets
attributable to common stock are higher than the total annual
expenses percentage would be for a company that is not
leveraged. The SEC requires that the Total annual
expenses percentage be calculated as a percentage of
average net assets, rather than average total assets, which
includes assets that have been funded with borrowed money. If
the Total annual expenses percentage were calculated
instead as a percentage of average total assets, we estimate
that our Total annual expenses would be
approximately 6.11% of average total assets. |
Example
The following example is required by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total
cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods
with respect to a hypothetical investment in us. In calculating
the following expense amounts, we assumed we would have no
additional leverage and that our operating expenses would remain
at the levels set forth in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
3 Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5.0% annual return
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses, and
actual expenses may be greater or lesser than those shown.
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5.0%
annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a
return greater or less than 5.0%. The table above does not
reflect additional SBA leverage that we intend to employ in the
future. Other expenses are based on estimated
amounts for the current fiscal year. In addition, while the
example assumes reinvestment of all dividends at net asset
value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will
receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by
dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a
participant by the market price per share of our common stock at
the close of trading on the dividend payment date, which may be
at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan in the accompanying prospectus for
additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
S-5
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus, before
you decide whether to make an investment in our common stock.
The risks set forth below and on page of the
accompanying prospectus are not the only risks we face. If any
of the adverse events or conditions described below occur, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value
(NAV) and the trading price of our common stock
could decline; we could reduce or eliminate our dividend; and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Recent
developments may increase the risks associated with our business
and an investment in us.
The U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high
level of volatility, disruption and distress, which was
exacerbated by the failure of several major financial
institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the
U.S. economy has entered a recession, which is likely to be
severe and prolonged. Similar conditions have occurred in the
financial markets and economies of numerous other countries and
could worsen, both in the U.S. and globally. These
conditions have raised the level of many of the risks described
in the accompanying prospectus and could have an adverse effect
on our portfolio companies as well as on our business, financial
condition, results of operations, dividend payments, access to
capital, valuation of our assets and our stock price.
When
we sell common stock at a discount to our net asset value per
share, stockholders who do not participate in such sale will
experience immediate dilution in an amount that may be
material.
We have obtained approval from our stockholders for us to be
able to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount from net asset value per share in
certain circumstances during the one-year period ending
May 6, 2009 as described in the accompanying prospectus.
The issuance or sale by us of shares of our common stock at a
discount to net asset value poses a risk of dilution to our
stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not purchase
additional shares at or below the discounted price in proportion
to their current ownership will experience an immediate decrease
in net asset value per share (as well as in the aggregate net
asset value of their shares if they do not participate at all).
These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately
greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and
assets and their voting power than the increase we experience in
our assets, potential earning power and voting interests from
such issuance or sale. In addition, such sales may adversely
affect the price at which our common stock trades. For
additional information and hypothetical examples of these risks,
see Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value in
this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering are
$
after deducting underwriting discounts of
$
and estimated offering expenses of approximately
$
payable by us. We intend to invest the net proceeds in lower
middle market companies in accordance with our investment
objective and strategies and for working capital and general
corporate purposes. Pending such use, we will invest the net
proceeds of this offering primarily in short-term securities
consistent with our BDC election and our election to be taxed as
a RIC. See Regulation Temporary
Investments in the accompanying prospectus.
S-6
CAPITALIZATION
You should read this table in conjunction with the historical
financial statements, and the notes thereto, of Triangle
contained in the accompanying prospectus. Additionally, the
unaudited pro forma, as adjusted information below should be
read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by,
the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto beginning on page of the
accompanying prospectus.
The following table sets forth our capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis as of December 31, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma, as adjusted basis to reflect the issuance and
sale
of shares
of our common stock by us in this offering at the public
offering price of $ per share,
less estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses
payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
27,193,287
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Borrowings (SBA-guaranteed debentures payable)
|
|
|
115,110,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share;
150,000,000 shares authorized, 6,917,363 shares
outstanding,
actual; shares
outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
87,836,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in excess of distributions
|
|
|
2,115,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated realized gains on investments
|
|
|
356,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments
|
|
|
1,109,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
91,425,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
$
|
206,535,163
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-7
DISTRIBUTIONS
AND PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. Our distributions, if any, will be
determined by our Board of Directors.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar
year an amount at least equal to the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
calendar year; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding
years that were not distributed during such years.
|
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (which we define as net long-term capital
gains in excess of short-term capital losses), if any, at least
annually, out of the assets legally available for such
distributions, we may decide in the future to retain such
capital gains for investment. In such event, the consequences of
our retention of net capital gains are as described under
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
in the accompanying prospectus. We can offer no assurance that
we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash
distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be
prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to
fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the
1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of
our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend then each stockholders dividend will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless the stockholder has specifically opted
out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive
cash dividends. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan in
the accompanying prospectus. To the extent prudent and
practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a
quarterly basis.
With respect to the dividends paid to stockholders, income from
origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront
fees associated with investments in portfolio companies were
treated as taxable income and distributed to stockholders. For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we declared total
dividends of approximately $10.0 million.
Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the year. Our ability to pay distributions
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol TCAP. The following table sets forth, for the
entire public trading history of our common stock, our NAV per
share of common stock and the high and low prices per share of
our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.
S-8
Our common stock has historically traded at prices both above
and below its NAV. There can be no assurance, however, that such
premium or discount, as applicable, to NAV will be maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium of
|
|
|
Discount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Sales
|
|
|
Low Sales
|
|
|
|
Net Asset
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Price to Net Asset
|
|
|
Price to Net Asset
|
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.57
|
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
|
|
117.9
|
%
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
$
|
15.79
|
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
|
|
114.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.8
|
%
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.99
|
|
|
$
|
14.99
|
|
|
$
|
11.95
|
|
|
|
107.1
|
%
|
|
|
85.4
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.50
|
|
|
$
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
105.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.85
|
|
|
$
|
13.40
|
|
|
$
|
12.94
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
93.4
|
%
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.73
|
|
|
$
|
12.25
|
|
|
$
|
11.85
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
%
|
|
|
86.3
|
%
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.76
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
99.9
|
%
|
|
|
72.0
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
12.92
|
|
|
$
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Second Quarter (through April 9, 2009)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
10.53
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net asset value has not yet been calculated for this period |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices.
The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at
the end of each period. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by
net asset value. |
On April , 2009, the last reported sales price
of our common stock was $ per
share, and our most recently determined NAV per share was
$ . As of April 9, 2009, we
had approximately 76 stockholders of record.
The table below sets forth each class of our outstanding
securities as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Held by
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
Registrant or for
|
|
Exclusive of Amount
|
Title of Class
|
|
Amount Authorized
|
|
its Account
|
|
Shown Under(3)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
SBA-Guaranteed Debentures
|
|
|
130,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,110,000
|
|
SALES OF
COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2008,
our stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited
number of shares of our common stock at any level of discount
from NAV per share during the one year period following such
approval, such period to end on May 6, 2009. In order to
sell shares pursuant to this authorization, a majority of our
directors who have no financial interest in the sale and a
majority of our independent directors must (a) find that
the sale is in our best interests and in the best interests of
our stockholders, and (b) in consultation with any
underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a good faith
determination as of a time either immediately prior to the first
solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to
purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the issuance of
such shares, that the price at which such shares are to be sold
is not less than a price which closely approximates the market
value of such shares, less any distributing commission or
discount.
S-9
The offering being made pursuant to this prospectus supplement
is at a price below our most recently determined NAV per share.
In making a determination that this offering is in our and our
stockholders best interests, our Board of Directors
considered a variety of factors including matters such as:
|
|
|
|
|
The effect that the offering will have on our stockholders,
including the potential dilution they may experience as a result
of the offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount per share by which the offering price per share and
the net proceeds per share are less than the most recently
determined NAV per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relationship of recent market prices of our common stock to
NAV per share and the potential impact of the offering on the
market price per share of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the estimated offering price would closely approximate
the market value of our shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The potential market impact of being able to raise capital
during the current financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in
the offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and
availability of investments; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The leverage available to us.
|
We will not sell shares under this prospectus supplement to the
post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which
this prospectus supplement forms a part (the current
amendment) if the cumulative dilution to the
Companys NAV per share from offerings under the current
amendment exceeds 15%. This will be measured separately for each
offering pursuant to the current amendment by calculating the
percentage dilution or accretion to aggregate NAV from that
offering and then summing the percentage from each offering. For
example, if our most recently determined NAV at the time of the
first offering is $15.00 and we have 30 million shares
outstanding, sale of 6 million shares at net proceeds to us
of $7.50 per share (a 50% discount) would produce dilution of
8.33%. If we subsequently determined that our NAV per share
increased to $15.75 on the then 36 million shares
outstanding and then made an additional offering, we could, for
example, sell approximately an additional 7.2 million
shares at net proceeds to us of $9.45 per share, which would
produce dilution of 6.67%, before we would reach the aggregate
15% limit. If we file a new post-effective amendment, the
threshold would reset.
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose
potential risks for our existing stockholders whether or not
they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors
who participate in the offering.
The following three headings and accompanying tables will
explain and provide hypothetical examples on the impact of an
offering at a price less than NAV per share on three different
set of investors:
|
|
|
|
|
existing stockholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
existing stockholders who purchase a relative small amount of
shares in the offering or a relatively large amount of shares in
the offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
new investors who become stockholders by purchasing shares in
the offering.
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering
below NAV per share or who do not buy additional shares in the
secondary market at the same or lower price we obtain in the
offering (after expenses and commissions) face the greatest
potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate
decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they
hold and their NAV per share. These stockholders will also
experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power
than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential
earning power and voting interests
S-10
due to the offering. These stockholders may also experience a
decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and
decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more
pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts
increases.
The following table illustrates the level of NAV dilution that
would be experienced by a current stockholder who does not
participate in this offering. It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Dilution to Non participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
69,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be
$ per Share)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be
$ per Share)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in this
Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in this offering or
who buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or
lower price as we obtain in this offering (after expenses and
commissions) will experience the same types of NAV dilution as
the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower level, to
the extent they purchase less than the same percentage of the
discounted offering as their interest in our shares immediately
prior to the offering. The level of NAV dilution will decrease
as the number of shares such stockholders purchase increases.
Existing stockholders who buy more than such percentage will
experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to existing
stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate share of
the offering, experience an increase (often called accretion) in
NAV per share over their investment per share and will also
experience a disproportionately greater increase in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power
than our increase in assets, potential earning power and voting
interests due to the offering. The level of accretion will
increase as the excess number of shares such stockholder
purchases increases. Even a stockholder who overparticipates
will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does
not participate, in which case such a stockholder will
experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent
offerings. These stockholders may also experience a decline in
the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some
degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per
share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the
offering and level of discounts increases.
S-11
The following table illustrates the level of dilution and
accretion in this offering for a current stockholder that
acquires shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share
of the offering (i.e., shares,
which is 0.5% of this offering rather than its 1.0%
proportionate share) and (2) 150% of such percentage
(i.e. shares, which is 1.5%
of the offering rather than its 1.0% proportionate share).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
69,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Assumed to Be $ per Share on
Shares Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be
$ per Share on Shares Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A
(Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Impact On
New Investors
Investors who are not currently stockholders and who participate
in an offering below NAV but whose investment per share is
greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling
compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. Investors who are not currently stockholders and who
participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose
investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per
share due to selling compensation and expenses paid by the
issuer being significantly less than the discount per share will
experience an immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately
greater participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning
power and voting interests. These investors will, however, be
subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new
S-12
stockholder will experience dilution as described above in such
subsequent offerings. These investors may also experience a
decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and
decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more
pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts
increases.
The following table illustrates the level of dilution or
accretion for new investors that will be experienced by a new
investor who purchases the same percentage (1.0%) of the shares
in this offering as the stockholder in the prior examples held
immediately prior to this offering. These stockholders or
investors may also experience a decline in the market price of
their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases. It is not possible to predict
the level of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Below NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,917,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per Share
Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Dilution per Share
Divided
by Investment
per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
S-13
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions of an underwriting agreement
dated ,
the underwriter named below has agreed to purchase from us the
number of shares of common stock indicated in the following
table.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriter are subject to approval of certain legal matters by
counsel, delivery of customary closing certificates and to
certain other conditions. The underwriter is obligated to
purchase all of the shares of common stock listed in the table
above if any of these shares are purchased.
The underwriter proposes to offer shares of our common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus supplement. Any shares sold by
the underwriter to securities dealers will be sold at the public
offering price less a selling concession not to exceed
$ per share. The underwriter may
allow a concession of not more than
$ per share to other brokers and
dealers.
This offering will conform with the requirements set forth in
Rule 2810 of the Conduct Rules of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA.
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us
or by the underwriter that would permit a public offering of the
shares of common stock included in this offering in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The
shares of common stock included in this offering may not be
offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus
supplement or any other offering material or advertisements in
connection with the offer and sales of any shares of common
stock be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except
under circumstances that will result in compliance with the
applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons
who receive this prospectus supplement are advised to inform
themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to
this offering of shares of our common stock and the distribution
of this prospectus supplement. This prospectus supplement is not
an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any
shares of our common stock included in this offering in any
jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal.
The underwriter has advised us that the it does not intend to
confirm sales to any account over which it exercises
discretionary authority.
Underwriting
Discount and Expenses
The following table summarizes the underwriting discount to be
paid to the underwriter by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Underwriting discount to be paid to the underwriter by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member
of FINRA will not be greater than 10% for the sale of any
securities being registered, including 0.5% for due diligence.
We will pay all expenses of the offering that we incur. We
estimate that our total expenses for this offering, excluding
the underwriting discount, will be approximately
$ .
Passive
Market Making Pursuant to Regulation M
In connection with this transaction, the underwriter may engage
in passive market making transactions in the common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market, prior to the pricing and completion of
this offering. Passive market making is permitted by SEC
Regulation M and consists of displaying bids on the NASDAQ
Global Market no higher than the bid prices of independent
market makers and making purchases at prices no higher than
these independent bids and effected in response to order flow.
Net purchases by a passive market maker on each day are limited
to a specified percentage of the passive market makers
average daily trading
S-14
volume in the common stock during a specified period and must
be discontinued when such limit is reached. Passive market
making may cause the price of the common stock to be higher than
the price that otherwise would exist in the open market in the
absence of such transactions.
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriter against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriter may be
required to make in respect of any of these liabilities.
Other
Relationships
The underwriter and its affiliates have provided in the past to
us, and may from time to time in the future provide, certain
commercial banking, financial advisory, investment banking and
other services, for which they will be entitled to receive
separate fees. The underwriter and its affiliates may from time
to time in the future engage in transactions with us and perform
services for us or our portfolio companies in the ordinary
course of business.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for us by Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC, Memphis, Tennessee, and Venable LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, will pass upon the legality of the common
stock offered by us and certain other matters of Maryland law.
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be
passed upon for the underwriter
by .
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, is the
independent public accounting firm for Triangle Capital
Corporation.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to the common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement. The registration statement contains
additional information about us and the common stock being
offered by this prospectus supplement.
We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information meeting
the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may
inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other
information, as well as the registration statement and related
exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC
at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
e-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549.
S-15
Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
PART C
Other
Information
|
|
Item 25
|
Financial
Statements and Exhibits
|
(1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements of the Registrant are
included in Part A of this Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of
Changes in Net Assets for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Combined Statement of Cash
Flows for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-15
|
|
(2) Exhibits
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (k)(7) to the Registration
Statement on
Form N-2/N-5,
File
No. 333-138418,
filed on November 3, 2006)
|
(b)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the
Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 25,
2009)
|
(c)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(d)
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on
Form N-2/N-5,
File
No. 333-138418,
filed on February 15, 2007)
|
(e)
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
March 12, 2008)
|
(f)(1)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000219 dated March 27, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(1) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(2)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000216 dated April 11, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(2) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(3)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000218 dated April 28, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(3) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(4)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000403 dated May 29, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(4) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(5)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000404 dated May 29, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(5) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(6)
|
|
Debenture No. 08000405 dated June 11, 2008 by and
between Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP and the U.S. Small
Business Administration (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(f)(6) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(f)(7)
|
|
Agreement to Furnish Certain Instruments (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (f)(7) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File
No. 333-151930,
filed on June 25, 2008)
|
(g)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(h)
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement*
|
C-1
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Triangle Capital Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on May 9, 2008)
|
(j)(1)
|
|
Custodian Agreement between the Registrant and U.S. Bank
National Association (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on
March 29, 2007)
|
(j)(2)
|
|
Amendment to Custody Agreement between the Registrant and U.S.
Bank National Association dated February 5, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
March 12, 2008)
|
(k)(1)
|
|
Stock Transfer Agency Agreement between the Registrant and The
Bank of New York (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit(k)(1) to
Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2/N-5,
File
No. 333-138418,
filed February 13, 2007)
|
(k)(2)
|
|
Office Lease Agreement between 3700 Glenwood LLC and Triangle
Capital Corporation dated March 27, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (k)(6) to Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File No. 333-151930 filed on August 13, 2008)
|
(l)
|
|
Opinion and Consent of Counsel (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (l) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File No. 333-151930 filed on August 13, 2008)
|
(m)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(n)(1)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, the independent
registered public accounting firm for Registrant
|
(n)(2)
|
|
Report of Ernst & Young LLP regarding the senior
security table contained herein
|
(n)(3)
|
|
Consent of Duff & Phelps, LLC (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (n)(3) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form N-2,
File No. 333-151930 filed on September 16, 2008)
|
(o)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(p)
|
|
Subscription and Investment Letter Agreement between the
Registrant and Garland S. Tucker III (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (p) to the Registration Statement on
Form N-2/N-5,
File
No. 333-138418,
filed November 3, 2006)
|
(q)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(r)
|
|
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1
to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed on
August 5, 2008)
|
(s)
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by post-effective amendment. |
|
|
Item 26.
|
Marketing
Arrangements
|
The information contained under the heading Plan of
Distribution on this Registration Statement is
incorporated herein by reference and any information concerning
any underwriters will be contained in the accompanying
prospectus supplement, if any.
|
|
Item 27.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
11,790
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market additional listing fee
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
*
|
FINRA fee
|
|
$
|
30,500
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
*
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
*
|
Printing and engraving
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
*
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,017,290
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated for filing purposes. |
All of the expenses set forth above shall be borne by the
Registrant.
C-2
|
|
Item 28.
|
Persons
Controlled By or Under Common Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP, a North Carolina limited
liability limited partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant
|
|
|
|
New Triangle GP, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company
and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
ARC Industries Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
Brantley Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerald Waste Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Hardware Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peaden Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porters Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
Tulcan Fund Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant
|
In addition, Triangle Capital Corporation may be deemed to
control certain portfolio companies. For a more detailed
discussion of these entities, see Portfolio
Companies in the prospectus.
|
|
Item 29.
|
Number
of Holders of Securities
|
The following table sets forth the number of record holders of
the Registrants capital stock at April 9, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
Title of Class
|
|
Record Holders
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
|
76
|
|
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
articles of incorporation a provision limiting the liability of
its directors and officers to the corporation and its
stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting
from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in
money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate
dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to
the cause of action. Our articles of incorporation contain such
a provision that eliminates directors and officers
liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law,
subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our articles of incorporation authorize us, to the maximum
extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements
of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or
officer or any individual who, while a director or officer and
at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real
estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director,
officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or
liability to which such person may become subject or which such
person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such
capacity.
Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any
individual who, while a director or officer and at our request,
serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment
trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan
or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee
and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the
proceeding by reason of his or her service in any such capacity
from and against any claim or liability to which that person may
become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his
or her service in any such capacity. Our bylaws also provide
that, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, with the
approval of our board of directors and provided that certain
conditions described in our bylaws are met, we may pay certain
expenses incurred by any such indemnified person in advance of
the final disposition of a proceeding upon receipt of an
undertaking by or on
C-3
behalf of such indemnified person to repay amounts we have so
paid if it is ultimately determined that indemnification of such
expenses is not authorized under our bylaws.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its articles of
incorporation provide otherwise, which our articles of
incorporation do not) to indemnify a director or officer who has
been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or
she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his
or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a
corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and
officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines,
settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in
connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in
those or other capacities unless it is established that
(a) the act or omission of the director or officer was
material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and
(1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result
of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or
officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money,
property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal
proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to
believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under
Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an
adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation
or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal
benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court
orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition,
Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable
expenses to a director or officer upon the corporations
receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or
officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met
the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the
corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or
on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by
the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard
of conduct was not met.
The Registrant has obtained primary and excess insurance
policies insuring our directors and officers against some
liabilities they may incur in their capacity as directors and
officers. Under such policies, the insurer, on the
Registrants behalf, may also pay amounts for which the
Registrant has granted indemnification to the directors or
officers.
|
|
Item 31.
|
Business
and Other Connections of Investment Adviser
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 32.
|
Location
of Accounts and Records.
|
All accounts, books and other documents required to be
maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, and the rules thereunder are maintained at the
Registrants offices at 3700 Glenwood Avenue,
Suite 530, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612.
|
|
Item 33.
|
Management
Services
|
Not applicable.
1. We hereby undertake to suspend any offering of shares
until the prospectus or prospectus supplement is amended if
(1) subsequent to the effective date of this registration
statement, our net asset value declines more than ten percent
from our net asset value as of the effective date of this
registration statement or (2) our net asset value increases
to an amount greater than our net proceeds (if applicable) as
stated in the prospectus or prospectus supplement.
2. We hereby undertake:
a. to file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(1) to include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act;
C-4
(2) to reflect in the prospectus or prospectus supplement
any facts or events after the effective date of this
registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in
this registration statement; and
(3) to include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this
registration statement or any material change to such
information in this registration statement.
b. for the purpose of determining any liability under the
1933 Act, that each such post-effective amendment to this
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of those securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
c. to remove from registration by means of a post-effective
amendment any of the securities being registered which remain
unsold at the termination of the offering.
d. for the purpose of determining liability under the
1933 Act to any purchaser, that if we are subject to
Rule 430C under the 1933 Act, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 497(b), (c), (d) or (e) under
the 1933 Act as part of this registration statement
relating to an offering shall be deemed to be part of and
included in the registration statement as of the date it is
first used after effectiveness, provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus or
prospectus supplement that is part of the registration statement
or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by
reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with
a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or
modify any statement that was made in the registration statement
or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or
made in any such document immediately prior to such date of
first use.
e. for the purpose of determining liability of the
Registrant under the 1933 Act to any purchaser in the
initial distribution of securities, that if the securities are
offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, we will be a seller to the purchaser
and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to the
purchaser:
(1) any preliminary prospectus or prospectus or prospectus
supplement of us relating to the offering required to be filed
pursuant to Rule 497 under the 1933 Act;
(2) the portion of any advertisement pursuant to
Rule 482 under the 1933 Act relating to the offering
containing material information about us or our securities
provided by or on behalf of us; and
(3) any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by us to the purchaser.
f. to file a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement, and to suspend any offers or sales pursuant the
registration statement until such post-effective amendment has
been declared effective under the 1933 Act, in the event the
shares of the Registrant are trading below its net asset value
and either (i) the Registrant receives, or has been advised
by its independent registered accounting firm that it will
receive, an audit report reflecting substantial doubt regarding
the Registrants ability to continue as a going concern or
(ii) the Registrant has concluded that a material adverse
change has occurred in its financial position or results of
operations that has caused the financial statements and other
disclosures on the basis of which the offering would be made to
be materially misleading.
C-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933
and/or the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused
this Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the
City of Raleigh, State of North Carolina, on April 13, 2009.
TRIANGLE CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Garland
S. Tucker, III
|
Name: Garland S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, each person whose signature
appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Garland S.
Tucker, III , Steven C. Lilly and C. Robert Knox, Jr.
his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any
and all amendments and
post-effective
amendments to this Registration Statement and any registration
statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Post-effective Amendment No. 1 has been signed below by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Garland
S. Tucker, III
Garland
S. Tucker, III
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Steven
C. Lilly
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Brent
P. W. Burgess
|
|
Chief Investment Officer and Director
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
C.
Robert Knox, Jr.
|
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
McComb Dunwoody
|
|
Director
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Benjamin
S. Goldstein
|
|
Director
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Simon
B. Rich, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Sherwood
H. Smith, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By: /s/ Garland
S. Tucker, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garland S. Tucker, III,
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
|
|
C-6